Literature DB >> 22455680

U.S. medical countermeasure development since 2001: a long way yet to go.

Philip K Russell1, Gigi Kwik Gronvall.   

Abstract

The U.S. government has taken significant steps toward developing and acquiring vaccines, drugs, and other medical countermeasures (MCMs) to protect and treat the population after a biological attack. In contrast to 2001, there is now a procedure for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to develop, license, and stockpile MCMs for civilian use. Another major accomplishment is smallpox preparedness: There is now an adequate supply of vaccine for every person in the U.S., and there is an alternative vaccine meant for immunocompromised people and those with close contact with them. In spite of these and other accomplishments, the U.S. government MCM effort has been criticized by federal advisory committees, National Academy of Sciences reports, a congressional commission, and outside analysts who state that the efforts lack central leadership and accountability and that the pace of progress has been slow. A clear operational strategy for using MCMs, which would guide their development and acquisition, is also lacking. In this article, we review key areas of progress made since 2001 to develop and acquire MCMs, and we summarize what we judge to be the most critical and often mentioned areas where improvements are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22455680     DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror        ISSN: 1538-7135


  5 in total

1.  Orthopoxvirus inhibitors that are active in animal models: an update from 2008 to 2012.

Authors:  Donald F Smee
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.831

2.  Structural and immunochemical relatedness suggests a conserved pathogenicity motif for secondary cell wall polysaccharides in Bacillus anthracis and infection-associated Bacillus cereus.

Authors:  Nazia Kamal; Jhuma Ganguly; Elke Saile; Silke R Klee; Alex Hoffmaster; Russell W Carlson; Lennart S Forsberg; Elmar L Kannenberg; Conrad P Quinn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios Gouglas; Kevin Marsh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  An interagency collaboration to facilitate development of filovirus medical countermeasures.

Authors:  Nicole Kilgore; Edwin O Nuzum
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 5.  Confronting the threat of bioterrorism: realities, challenges, and defensive strategies.

Authors:  Manfred S Green; James LeDuc; Daniel Cohen; David R Franz
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 25.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.