| Literature DB >> 22455366 |
Anton G Gossner1, Virginia M Venturina, Darren J Shaw, Josephine M Pemberton, John Hopkins.
Abstract
Teladorsagia circumcincta is the most economically important gastrointestinal (abomasal) nematode parasite of sheep in cool temperate regions, to which sheep show genetically-varying resistance to infection. Lambs, from parents with genetic variation for resistance, were trickle infected with L3 larvae over 12 weeks. 45 lambs were identified with a range of susceptibilities as assessed by: adult worm count at post mortem, faecal egg count (FEC) and IgA antibody levels. This project investigated the correlation of T cell cytokine expression and resistance to infection at the mature stage of response, when the resistant lambs had excluded all parasites.Histopathology showed only minor changes in resistant animals with a low level lymphocyte infiltration; but in susceptible lambs, major pathological changes were associated with extensive infiltration of lymphocytes, eosinophils and neutrophils.Absolute quantitative RT-qPCR assays on the abomasal lymph node (ALN) revealed a significant positive correlation between IL6, IL21 and IL23A transcript levels with adult worm count and FEC. IL23A was also negatively correlated with IgA antibody levels. Significantly positive correlation of TGFB1 levels with adult worm count and FEC were also seen in the abomasal mucosa. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that the inability to control L3 larval colonization, adult worm infection and egg production is due to the activation of the inflammatory Th17 T cell subset.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22455366 PMCID: PMC3422184 DOI: 10.1186/1297-9716-43-26
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Figure 1 Histopathology of abomasum H&E stained sections (x100) of abomasum from uninfected control (A), resistant (B) and susceptible lambs (C and D).
Relative quantification of mRNA transcripts in abomasal lymph node
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL2 | 1.58 ± 0.51 | 0.20 | 1.31 ± 0.66 | 0.60 | 1.32 ± 0.43 | 0.68 |
| IL4 | | ND | | | ||
| IL6 | 1.25 ± 0.45 | 0.88 | ||||
| IL7R | 1.04 ± 0.28 | 0.10 | −1.01 ± 0.54 | 0.96 | 1.17 ± 0.31 | 0.98 |
| IL10 | 1.73 ± 0.60 | 0.16 | 1.51 ± 0.29 | 0.42 | 1.16 ± 0.40 | 0.78 |
| IL17A | ND | | ND | | ND | |
| IL12B | −1.23 ± 0.25 | 0.74 | 1.15 ± 0.69 | 0.90 | −1.25 ± 0.24 | 0.48 |
| IL21 | −1.01 ± 0.48 | 0.99 | ||||
| IL23A | 1.40 ± 0.19 | 0.23 | 1.19 ± 0.36 | 0.76 | 1.22 ± 0.16 | 0.58 |
| IL25 | ND | | ND | | ND | |
| EBI3 | −1.19 ± 0.46 | 0.63 | −1.85 ± 0.27 | 0.10 | ||
| FOXP3 | −1.11 ± 0.18 | 0.59 | ||||
| IFNG | −1.22 ± 0.22 | 0.40 | −1.32 ± 0.29 | 0.38 | ||
| TGFB1 | 1.51 ± 0.28 | 0.22 | 1.46 ± 0.49 | 0.16 | 1.08 ± 0.20 | 0.98 |
* Fold change is the ratio of normalized mean expression between groups. Means of the uninfected controls were used as the calibrator and compared with the infected animals; n = 5 for each group.
ND; not determined, IL4, IL17A and IL25 levels were outside the dynamic range of linearity of the assay and were too low to be accurately quantified and therefore valid comparisons could not be made. Bold is P ≤ 0.05.
Relative quantification of mRNA transcripts in abomasal mucosa
| Gene | fold change | P- value | fold change | P-value | fold change | P-value |
| IL6 | 4.44 ± 1.91 | 2.48 ± 0.81 | 0.23 | 1.79 ± 2.36 | 0.07 | |
| IL7R | −1.33 ± 0.19 | 0.33 | 1.00 ± 0.41 | 0.74 | −1.33 ± 0.45 | 0.74 |
| IL10 | 1.00 ± 0.30 | 0.66 | −1.54 ± 0.18 | 0.19 | 1.53 ± 1.63 | 0.60 |
| EBI3 | −1.43 ± 0.40 | 0.33 | −1.16 ± 0.35 | 0.70 | −1.22 ± 1.12 | 0.78 |
| IFNG | 2.03 ± 1.30 | 0.89 | 1.44 ± 0.76 | 0.94 | 1.41 ± 0.70 | 0.70 |
| TGFB1 | 2.53 ± 0.35 | 1.35 ± 0.32 | 0.41 | 1.88 ± 0.12 | ||
Bold is P ≤ 0.05. n = 5 for each group
Figure 2Cytokine transcript expression in the abomasal lymph node ofinfected sheep copy number per μg total RNA. * P ≤ 0.03 and ** P ≤ 0.01 for the individual comparisons. Control, n = 10; Resistant (FEC < 10), n = 15; Intermediate (FEC 10 – 219), n = 15; Susceptible (FEC > 220) n = 15. Error bars are means ± SD.
Figure 3 Cytokine transcript expression in the abomasal mucosa ofinfected sheep.copy number per μg total RNA. * P ≤ 0.03 and ** P ≤ 0.01 for the individual comparisons. Control, n = 10; Resistant (FEC < 10), n = 15; Intermediate (FEC 10 – 219), n = 15; Susceptible (FEC > 220) n = 15. Error bars are means ± SD
Correlation analysis of phenotypic parameters with cytokine transcript copy number in ALN and abomasal mucosa
| | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL6 | −0.21 | 0.167 | 0.0665 | 0.664 | ||||
| IL21 | −0.135 | 0.377 | 0.031 | 0.838 | ||||
| IL23A | −0.054 | 0.05 | ||||||
| EBI3 | 0.003 | 0.982 | −0.179 | 0.239 | −0.164 | 0.283 | −0.025 | 0.870 |
| TGFB1 | −0.128 | 0.402 | −0.020 | 0.895 | −0.125 | 0.414 | 0.138 | 0.365 |
| IL6 | 0.1417 | 0.3526 | 0.1563 | 0.3053 | −0.2737 | 0.0688 | −0.1979 | 0.1926 |
| TGFB1 | −0.2558 | 0.0899 | 0.0066 | 0.9657 | ||||
Bold; significant correlation (P ≤ 0.05).
aρ, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient; n = 45 infected lambs.