Literature DB >> 22454398

Definition of treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis based on the simplified and the clinical disease activity index.

Daniel Aletaha1, Jose Martinez-Avila, Tore K Kvien, Josef S Smolen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) are established instruments to measure disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To date, no validated response definitions for the SDAI and CDAI are available.
OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to define minor, moderate and major response criteria for the SDAI.
METHODS: The authors used data from two clinical trials on infliximab versus methotrexate in early (ASPIRE) or established (ATTRACT) RA, and identified the three SDAI cutpoints based on the best agreement (by κ statistics) with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70 responses. Cutpoints were then tested for different aspects of validity in the trial datasets and in a Norwegian disease modifying antirheumatic drug prescription dataset (NOR-DMARD).
RESULTS: Based on agreement with the ACR response, the minor, moderate and major responses were identified as SDAI 50%, 70% and 85% improvement. These cutpoints had good face validity concerning the disease activity states achieved by the different response definitions. Construct validity was shown by a clear association of increasing SDAI response categories with increasing levels of functional improvement, achievement of better functional states and lower annual radiographic progression. Across SDAI 50/70/85, the sensitivities regarding a patient-perceived improvement decreased (73%/39%/22%) and the specificities increased (61%/89%/96%) in a meaningful way. Further, the cutpoints discriminated the different treatment arms in ASPIRE and ATTRACT. The same cutpoints were used for the CDAI, with similar results in the validation analyses.
CONCLUSION: These new response criteria expand the usefulness of the SDAI and CDAI for their use as endpoints in clinical trials beyond the definition of disease activity categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22454398     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  29 in total

Review 1.  Use of data from multiple registries in studying biologic discontinuation: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Kazuki Yoshida; Helga Radner; Arthur Kavanaugh; Yoon-Kyoung Sung; Sang-Cheol Bae; Mitsumasa Kishimoto; Kazuo Matsui; Masato Okada; Shigeto Tohma; Michael E Weinblatt; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.473

2.  Determining the Minimally Important Difference in the Clinical Disease Activity Index for Improvement and Worsening in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

Authors:  J R Curtis; S Yang; L Chen; J E Pope; E C Keystone; B Haraoui; G Boire; J C Thorne; D Tin; C A Hitchon; C O Bingham; V P Bykerk
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor levels are correlated with response to tocilizumab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kasama; Sakiko Isojima; Masayu Umemura; Hiroyuki Tsukamoto; Takehiro Tokunaga; Hidekazu Furuya; Ryo Yanai; Ryo Takahashi; Masanori Nakamura; Katsunori Inagaki
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Origins of Discordant Responses among 3 Rheumatoid Arthritis Improvement Criteria.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria I Alba; Abhijit Dasgupta
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Test-retest reliability of the disease activity score 28 CRP (DAS28-CRP), the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) in rheumatoid arthritis when based on patient self-assessment of tender and swollen joints.

Authors:  Cecilie Heegaard; Lene Dreyer; Charlotte Egsmose; Ole Rintek Madsen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Stability of clinical outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis patients with stable disease defined on the basis of the EULAR response criteria.

Authors:  Ole Rintek Madsen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  Chronic Pain in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Kristen Mathias; Abhimanyu Amarnani; Neha Pal; Jay Karri; Daniel Arkfeld; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2021-07-16

8.  Comparison of the diagnostic potential of three anti-citrullinated protein antibodies as adjuncts to rheumatoid factor and CCP in a cohort of South African rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Pieter W A Meyer; Mahmood T M Ally; Bridget Hodkinson; Ronald Anderson; Mohammed Tikly
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Tofacitinib versus tocilizumab in the treatment of biological-naïve or previous biological-failure patients with methotrexate-refractory active rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Shunsuke Mori; Yukitomo Urata; Tamami Yoshitama; Yukitaka Ueki
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-05

10.  Gray-scale and color duplex Doppler ultrasound of hand joints in the evaluation of disease activity and treatment in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Gordana Ivanac; Jadranka Morović-Vergles; Boris Brkljačić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.