Literature DB >> 22453786

Prospective clinical assessment of the transvaginal mesh technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-5-year results.

Dennis Miller1, Vincent Lucente, Elizabeth Babin, Patricia Beach, Peter Jones, David Robinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: : The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness and complication rates for the transvaginal (TVM) technique in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
METHODS: : Women with symptomatic POP (POP-Q stage II-IV) were invited to participate in this institutional review board-approved 5-year study at 3 US centers. All enrolled patients underwent prolapse repair surgery with GYNEMESH PS Prolene Nonabsorbable Soft Mesh using the TVM technique. Success was defined as International Continence Society (ICS) POP-Q stage I or less. The Prolapse-Specific Inventory and quality-of-life questionnaire was used as a subjective outcome measure.
RESULTS: : Eighty-five women were included. Sixty-six patients were available for follow-up at 5 years. Overall anatomic success rates were 88% (90% confidence interval [CI], 80%-93%), 69% (90% CI, 59%-78%), and 67% (95% CI, 56%-76%) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Anatomic success rates in treated compartments were 89% (90% CI, 82%-94%), 76% (90% CI, 66%-84%), and 77% (90% CI, 67%-85%) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. When defined as treated side leading edge above the hymen, success rates were 89% at 5 years. Five patients required reoperation for prolapse by 5 years. Statistically significant improvements in quality-of-life and Prolapse-Specific Inventory scores were sustained over 5 years. Mesh exposure was observed in 16 of 85 patients over the 5 years. Nine required partial mesh excision. There were 3 patients with some degree of dyspareunia, reported between 3 and 5 years, whereas in 8, preexisting dyspareunia resolved. There was 1 rectovaginal fistula reported and 2 reported ureteral injuries, one of which resulted in a ureteral-vaginal fistula; all resolved after repair.
CONCLUSIONS: : Five-year results indicated that TVM provided a stable anatomic repair. Improvements in quality of life and associated improvements in specific prolapse symptoms were sustained over the 5-year period. Mesh exposure was the most common complication.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22453786     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182175da6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  17 in total

1.  Medium-term clinical outcomes following surgical repair for vaginal prolapse with tension-free mesh and vaginal support device.

Authors:  T Sayer; J Lim; J M Gauld; P Hinoul; P Jones; N Franco; D Van Drie; M Slack
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Informed surgical consent for a mesh/graft-augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Dennis Miller; Alfredo L Milani; Suzette E Sutherland; Bonnie Navin; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Systematic reviews of apical prolapse surgery: are we being misled down a dangerous path?

Authors:  Michael Moen; John Gebhart; Karl Tamussino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus transvaginal mesh for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Cheryl B Iglesia; Douglass S Hale; Vincent R Lucente
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Traditional native tissue vs mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature. Comment.

Authors:  B Jacquetin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Use of mesh in vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery: prolapse surgery-an overview.

Authors:  C V Hegde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2011-09-22

7.  Synthetic Graft Augmentation in Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: Long-Term Objective and Subjective Outcomes.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Gerald McGwin; Thomas A Swain; Mitchell D Alvarez; David R Ellington; Holly E Richter
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  The myth: in vivo degradation of polypropylene-based meshes.

Authors:  Shelby F Thames; Joshua B White; Kevin L Ong
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Incidence and Risk Factors for Pelvic Pain After Mesh Implant Surgery for the Treatment of Pelvic Floor Disorders.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Geller; Emma Babb; Andrea G Nackley; Denniz Zolnoun
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.137

10.  Outcomes of trocar-guided Gynemesh PS™ versus single-incision trocarless Polyform™ transvaginal mesh procedures.

Authors:  Maryse Larouche; Lisa Merovitz; José A Correa; Jens-Erik Walter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.