Literature DB >> 22453257

Vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

.   

Abstract

Since 2004, use of synthetic mesh has increased in vaginal surgery for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. However, concerns exist about the safety and efficacy of transvaginally placed mesh. Based on the currently available limited data, although many patients undergoing mesh-augmented vaginal repairs heal well without problems, there seems to be a small but significant group of patients who experience permanent and life-altering sequelae, including pain and dyspareunia, from the use of vaginal mesh. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society provide background information on the use of vaginally placed mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and offer recommendations for practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22453257     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182495885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  9 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of skeletonized mesh implants for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  Adi Y Weintraub; Menahem Neuman; Yonatan Reuven; Joerg Neymeyer; Naama Marcus-Braun
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Challenges and future prospects for tissue engineering in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Bertha Chen; Bhumy Dave
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Rate of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Among Privately Insured Women in the United States, 2010-2013.

Authors:  Anne G Sammarco; Carolyn W Swenson; Neil S Kamdar; Emily K Kobernik; John O L DeLancey; Brahmajee Nallamothu; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review.

Authors:  Dorit Paz-Levy; David Yohay; Joerg Neymeyer; Ranit Hizkiyahu; Adi Y Weintraub
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Pain Scores and Exposure Rates after Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Jana D Illston; Jeffrey B Garris; Holly E Richter; Thomas L Wheeler
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh.

Authors:  Laura C Skoczylas; Lindsay C Turner; Li Wang; Daniel G Winger; Jonathan P Shepherd
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tineke F M Vergeldt; Mirjam Weemhoff; Joanna IntHout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Safety and short term outcomes of a new truly minimallyinvasive mesh-less and dissection-less anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse apical repair.

Authors:  Adi Y Weintraub; Masha Ben Zvi; David Yohay; Joerg Neymeyer; Yonatan Reuven; Menahem Neuman; Alex Tsivian
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Analyzing the learning curve of vaginal pelvic reconstruction surgery with and without mesh by the cumulative summation test (CUSUM).

Authors:  Chin-Jui Wu; Kuan-Ju Huang; Wen-Chun Chang; Ying-Xuan Li; Lin-Hung Wei; Bor-Ching Sheu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.