Literature DB >> 22452501

Bioavailability of a novel midazolam gel after intranasal administration in dogs.

Joseph S Eagleson1, Simon R Platt, Deborah L Elder Strong, Marc Kent, Anne C Freeman, Peter P Nghiem, Bo Zheng, Catherine A White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of a novel bioadhesive gel formulation of midazolam after intranasal (IN) administration with that of midazolam solution after IN, IV, and rectal administration to dogs. ANIMALS: 10 (5 males and 5 females) healthy adult Beagles. PROCEDURES: Dogs were assigned to 4 treatment groups for a crossover study design. Initially, midazolam solution (5 mg/mL) was administered (0.2 mg/kg) IV to group 1, rectally to group 2, and IN to group 3; a 0.4% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose midazolam gel formulation (50 mg/mL) was administered (0.2 mg/kg, IN) to group 4. Each dog received all 4 treatments; there was a 7-day washout period between subsequent treatments. Blood samples were collected before and after midazolam administration. Plasma concentration of midazolam was determined by use of high-performance liquid chromatography.
RESULTS: The peak plasma concentration after IN administration of the gel formulation was significantly higher than that after IN and rectal administration of the solution. Mean ± SD time to peak concentration was 11.70 ± 2.63 minutes (gel IN), 17.50 ± 2.64 minutes (solution IN), and 39 ± 14.49 minutes (solution rectally). Mean bioavailability of midazolam was 70.4% (gel IN), 52.0% (solution IN), and 49.0% (solution rectally). Bioavailability after IN administration of the gel formulation was significantly higher than that after IN and rectal administration of the solution. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: IN administration of midazolam gel was superior to both IN and rectal administration of midazolam solution with respect to peak plasma concentration and bioavailability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22452501     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.73.4.539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  3 in total

1.  Intranasal Midazolam versus Rectal Diazepam for the Management of Canine Status Epilepticus: A Multicenter Randomized Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.

Authors:  M Charalambous; S F M Bhatti; L Van Ham; S Platt; N D Jeffery; A Tipold; J Siedenburg; H A Volk; D Hasegawa; A Gallucci; G Gandini; M Musteata; E Ives; A E Vanhaesebrouck
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  First-line management of canine status epilepticus at home and in hospital-opportunities and limitations of the various administration routes of benzodiazepines.

Authors:  Marios Charalambous; Holger A Volk; Luc Van Ham; Sofie F M Bhatti
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Comparison of intranasal versus intravenous midazolam for management of status epilepticus in dogs: A multi-center randomized parallel group clinical study.

Authors:  Marios Charalambous; Holger A Volk; Andrea Tipold; Johannes Erath; Enrice Huenerfauth; Antonella Gallucci; Gualtiero Gandini; Daisuke Hasegawa; Theresa Pancotto; John H Rossmeisl; Simon Platt; Luisa De Risio; Joan R Coates; Mihai Musteata; Federica Tirrito; Francesca Cozzi; Laura Porcarelli; Daniele Corlazzoli; Rodolfo Cappello; An Vanhaesebrouck; Bart J G Broeckx; Luc Van Ham; Sofie F M Bhatti
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.333

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.