Literature DB >> 22452371

Prediction of segmental lean mass using anthropometric variables in young adults.

Aldo Scafoglieri1, Jonathan Tresignie, Steven Provyn, Mike Marfell-Jones, Thomas Reilly, Ivan Bautmans, Jan Pieter Clarys.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to develop and cross-validate anthropometrical prediction equations for segmental lean tissue mass (SLM). One hundred and seventeen young healthy Caucasians (67 men and 50 women; mean age: 31.9 ± 10.0 years; Body Mass Index: 24.3 ± 3.2 kg · m(-2)) were included. Body mass (BM), stretch stature (SS), 14 circumferences (CC), 13 skinfolds (SF) and 4 bone breadths (BB) were used as anthropometric measurements. Segmental lean mass of both arms, trunk and both legs were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry as the criterion method. Three prediction equations for SLM were developed as follows: arms = 40.394(BM) + 169.836(CCarm-tensed) + 399.162(CCwrist) - 85.414(SFtriceps) - 39.790(SFbiceps) - 7289.190, where Adj.R (2) = 0.97, P < 0.001, and standard error of estimate (SEE) = 355 g;trunk = 181.530(BM) + 155.037(SS) + 534.818(CCneck) + 175.638(CCchest) - 88.359(SFchest) - 147.232(SFsupraspinale) - 46522.165, where Adj.R(2) = 0.97, P < 0.001, and SEE = 1077g; and legs = 55.838(BM) + 88.356(SS) + 235.579(CCmid-thigh) + 278.595(CCcalf) + 288.984(CCankle) - 84.954(SFfront-thigh) - 53.009(SFmedial calf) - 28522.241, where Adj.R (2) = 0.96, P < 0.001, and SEE = 724 g. Cross-validation statistics showed no significant differences (P < 0.05) between observed and predicted SLM. Root mean squared errors were smallest for arms (362 g), followed by legs (820 g) and trunk (1477 g). These new prediction equations allow an accurate estimation of segmental lean mass in groups of young adults, but estimation errors of 8 to 14% can occur in certain individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22452371     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.670716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  5 in total

Review 1.  Use of anthropometry for the prediction of regional body tissue distribution in adults: benefits and limitations in clinical practice.

Authors:  Aldo Scafoglieri; Jan Pieter Clarys; Erik Cattrysse; Ivan Bautmans
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 6.745

2.  Impact-Induced Muscle Damage: Performance Implications in Response to a Novel Collision Simulator and Associated Timeline of Recovery.

Authors:  Mitchell Naughton; Joanna Miller; Gary J Slater
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Predicting muscular strength using demographics, skeletal dimensions, and body composition measures.

Authors:  Sean T Stanelle; Stephen F Crouse; Tyler R Heimdal; Steven E Riechman; Alexandra L Remy; Bradley S Lambert
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-02-15

4.  A retrospective comparison of physical health in regular recreational table tennis participants and sedentary elderly men.

Authors:  Aynollah Naderi; Hans Degens; Mohammad Hossein Rezvani; Fatemeh Shaabani
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  Are body circumferences able to predict strength, muscle mass and bone characteristics in obesity? A preliminary study in women.

Authors:  Valentina Cavedon; Chiara Milanese; Carlo Zancanaro
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.