Literature DB >> 22450523

Top down modulation of attention to food cues via working memory.

Suzanne Higgs1, Femke Rutters, Jason M Thomas, Katherine Naish, Glyn W Humphreys.   

Abstract

Attentional biases towards food cues may be linked to the development of obesity. The present study investigated the mechanisms underlying attentional biases to food cues by assessing the role of top down influences, such as working memory (WM). We assessed whether attention in normal-weight, sated participants was drawn to food items specifically when that food item was held in WM. Twenty-three participants (15 f/8 m, age 23.4±5 year, BMI 23.5±4 kg/m(2)) took part in a laboratory based study assessing reaction times to food and non-food stimuli. Participants were presented with an initial cue stimulus to either hold in WM or to merely attend to, and then searched for the target (a circle) in a two-item display. On valid trials the target was flanked by a picture matching the cue, on neutral trials the display did not contain a picture matching the cue, and on invalid trials the distractor (a square) was flanked by a picture matching the cue. Cues were food, cars or stationery items. We observed that, relative to the effects with non-food stimuli, food items in WM strongly affected attention when the memorised cue re-appeared in the search display. In particular there was an enhanced response on valid trials, when the re-appearance of the memorised cue coincided with the search target. There were no effects of cue category on attentional guidance when the cues were merely attended to but not held in WM. These data point towards food having a strong effect on top-down guidance of search from working memory, and suggest a mechanism whereby individuals who are preoccupied with thoughts of food, for example obese individuals, show facilitated detection of food cues in the environment.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22450523     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  15 in total

1.  Executive control resources and snack food consumption in the presence of restraining versus facilitating cues.

Authors:  Peter A Hall; Cassandra Lowe; Corita Vincent
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2013-08-13

2.  Electrophysiological evidence for enhanced representation of food stimuli in working memory.

Authors:  Femke Rutters; Sanjay Kumar; Suzanne Higgs; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Emotional faces influence evaluation of natural and transformed food.

Authors:  Valerio Manippa; Caterina Padulo; Alfredo Brancucci
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 4.  Human cognitive function and the obesogenic environment.

Authors:  Ashley A Martin; Terry L Davidson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-03-11

5.  Implications of learning theory for developing programs to decrease overeating.

Authors:  Kerri N Boutelle; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Hunger-Dependent Enhancement of Food Cue Responses in Mouse Postrhinal Cortex and Lateral Amygdala.

Authors:  Christian R Burgess; Rohan N Ramesh; Arthur U Sugden; Kirsten M Levandowski; Margaret A Minnig; Henning Fenselau; Bradford B Lowell; Mark L Andermann
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  The BestFIT trial: A SMART approach to developing individualized weight loss treatments.

Authors:  Nancy E Sherwood; Meghan L Butryn; Evan M Forman; Daniel Almirall; Elisabeth M Seburg; A Lauren Crain; Alicia S Kunin-Batson; Marcia G Hayes; Rona L Levy; Robert W Jeffery
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Stimuli predicting high-calorie reward increase dopamine release and drive approach to food in the absence of homeostatic need.

Authors:  Alexander Gómez-A; Tatiana A Shnitko; Kevin L Caref; Saleem M Nicola; Donita L Robinson
Journal:  Nutr Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.994

Review 9.  Complex mechanisms linking neurocognitive dysfunction to insulin resistance and other metabolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Luke E Stoeckel; Zoe Arvanitakis; Sam Gandy; Dana Small; C Ronald Kahn; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Aaron Pawlyk; Robert Sherwin; Philip Smith
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-03-15

10.  Dietary self-control influences top-down guidance of attention to food cues.

Authors:  Suzanne Higgs; Dirk Dolmans; Glyn W Humphreys; Femke Rutters
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.