Literature DB >> 22450175

Predictors of workplace satisfaction for U.S. medical school faculty in an era of change and challenge.

Sarah A Bunton1, April M Corrice, Susan M Pollart, Karen D Novielli, Valerie N Williams, Leslie A Morrison, Elza Mylona, Shannon Fox.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the current state of satisfaction with the academic medicine workplace among U.S. medical school faculty and the workplace factors that have the greatest influence on global satisfaction.
METHOD: The authors used data from the 2009 administration of a medical school faculty job satisfaction survey and used descriptive statistics and χ analyses to assess levels of overall satisfaction within faculty subgroups. Multiple regressions used the mean scores of the 18 survey dimensions and demographic variables to predict three global satisfaction measures.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 9,638 full-time faculty from 23 U.S. medical schools. Respondents were mostly satisfied on global satisfaction measures including satisfaction with their department (6,506/9,128; 71.3%) and medical school (5,796/9,124; 63.5%) and whether they would again choose to work at their medical school (5,968/8,506; 70.2%). The survey dimensions predicted global satisfaction well, with the final models explaining 51% to 67% of the variance in the dependent measures. Predictors across models include organization, governance, and transparency; focus of mission; recruitment and retention effectiveness; department relationships; workplace culture; and nature of work.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively unpredictable environmental challenges facing medical schools today, leaders have opportunities to influence and improve the workplace satisfaction of their faculty. Examples of opportunities include fostering a culture characterized by open communication and occasions for faculty input, and remaining vigilant regarding factors contributing to faculty burnout. Understanding what drives faculty satisfaction is crucial for medical schools as they continue to seek excellence in all missions and recruit and retain high-quality faculty.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22450175     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824d2b37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  12 in total

1.  Predictors of job satisfaction among academic family medicine faculty: Findings from a faculty work-life and leadership survey.

Authors:  Paul Krueger; David White; Christopher Meaney; Jeffrey Kwong; Viola Antao; Florence Kim
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The American Society of Hematology (ASH) Medical Educators Institute: a Pilot Faculty Development Project for Hematology Educators.

Authors:  Jennifer C Kesselheim; Charles P Clayton; Josel Fritz; Roy E Smith; Scott D Gitlin; Erin Reid; Kenneth S Zuckerman; Marc J Kahn
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Mentorship in an academic medical center.

Authors:  Philip F Binkley; Heather C Brod
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Engagement and Workplace Satisfaction of Emergency Medicine Faculty in the United States.

Authors:  Raymond Lucas; Valerie Dandar; James Scott
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-06-02

5.  Nationwide survey of work environment, work-life balance and burnout among psychiatrists in Japan.

Authors:  Wakako Umene-Nakano; Takahiro A Kato; Saya Kikuchi; Masaru Tateno; Daisuke Fujisawa; Tsutomu Hoshuyama; Jun Nakamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Response to Letter to the Editor: "Trends in Endocrinology Fellowship Recruitment: Reasons for Concern and Possible Interventions".

Authors:  Giulio R Romeo; Irl B Hirsch; Robert W Lash; Robert A Gabbay
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Applying a Mixed-Method Approach to Improve On-the-Job Learning and Job Satisfaction in a Cohort of Interns at a University Hospital.

Authors:  Amna S Butt; Muhammad S Shamim; M Asghar Ali; Farah Qamar; Irum Q Khan; Swaleha Tariq; Syeda Amrah Hashmi; Quratulain Hafeez; Muhammed Tariq
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-24

8.  Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre.

Authors:  B A M van den Berg; Arnold B Bakker; Th J Ten Cate
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2013-11

9.  Predictors of early faculty attrition at one Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Brenda A Bucklin; Morgan Valley; Cheryl Welch; Zung Vu Tran; Steven R Lowenstein
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Engaging students and faculty: implications of self-determination theory for teachers and leaders in academic medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lyness; Stephen J Lurie; Denham S Ward; Christopher J Mooney; David R Lambert
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.