Literature DB >> 22449999

Study on the necessary survey days for energy intake in school children assessed by 7 day survey.

Atsuko Yamaguchi1, Nobuko Tanaka, Yoko Eguchi, Kazue Kuno, Noriko Wakikawa, Nobuko Sarukura, Mina Fukinbara, Shigeru Yamamoto.   

Abstract

Theoretically, the longer the period of a nutrition survey, the more reliable the results. However, a long survey can impose a burden on subjects and cause the results to become inaccurate. For adults, a 3 non-consecutive day survey is usually recommended; however, for school children, at least in Japan, it has not been determined whether this is necessary. In this study we conducted a survey of 7 days and tried to find the minimum number of days necessary to determine the energy intake. The subjects were about 300 children aged from 6 to 7, 10 to 11 and 13 to 14 years old in a city in the western part of Japan. The weighing method was used for the school lunch and other meals were surveyed by 24-recalling method. For the 6-7 year-old school children, guardians were asked to keep dietary records. The final number of subjects who were able to complete the 7-day survey was 139. Energy intakes for each weekday were not statistically different (p>0.05) and those for each weekend did not differ (p>0.05). Average energy intakes on weekdays were higher than those on weekend days in 10-11 and 13-14 year-old children. The average intakes of energy in 10-11 and 13-14 year-old children were lower than Japanese estimated energy requirements (EER). However, body weight of more than 90% of subjects was within the normal range. The results suggest that a survey of one weekday is reliable for all weekdays and that of one week-end day is reliable for any weekend day and also indicate the necessity of further studies of EER in rapidly growing children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22449999     DOI: 10.2152/jmi.59.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Invest        ISSN: 1343-1420


  2 in total

1.  European children's sugar intake on weekdays versus weekends: the IDEFICS study.

Authors:  A Svensson; C Larsson; G Eiben; A Lanfer; V Pala; A Hebestreit; I Huybrechts; J M Fernández-Alvira; P Russo; A C Koni; S De Henauw; T Veidebaum; D Molnár; L Lissner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Understanding differences between summer vs. school obesogenic behaviors of children: the structured days hypothesis.

Authors:  Keith Brazendale; Michael W Beets; R Glenn Weaver; Russell R Pate; Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Andrew T Kaczynski; Jessica L Chandler; Amy Bohnert; Paul T von Hippel
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 6.457

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.