Literature DB >> 22449728

Comparison of the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 and the Charlson Comorbidity indices in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

V S Nesic1, Z M Petrovic, S B Sipetic, S D Jesic, I A Soldatovic, D A Kastratovic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the prognostic impact of comorbidity grading by the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 index and the Charlson Comorbidity Index on the five-year overall and disease-specific survival in patients undergoing surgery for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
METHODS: The impact of comorbidity and other factors on survival was examined retrospectively in a group of 177 patients with previously untreated tumour stage one to four laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma surgically treated at the Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Clinical Centre of Serbia, between 2000 and 2003. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify independent prognostic factors.
RESULTS: On univariate analysis, comorbidity had an impact on prognosis regardless of which index was used. On multivariate analysis, the significant predictors of patients' five-year overall and disease-specific survival were tumour-node-metastasis stage and comorbidity as graded by the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 index.
CONCLUSION: The Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 index is a more reliable predictor of survival than the Charlson Comorbidity Index in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22449728     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215112000254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  10 in total

1.  Matched-pair analysis of survival in patients with poorly differentiated versus well and moderately differentiated hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xin Xia; Ya Liang; Yingying Zhu; Xiaoli Zhu; Wenwen Diao; Xingming Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Comparison of comorbidity collection methods.

Authors:  Dorina Kallogjeri; Sheila M Gaynor; Marilyn L Piccirillo; Raymond A Jean; Edward L Spitznagel; Jay F Piccirillo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Comparing the symptom experience of cancer patients and non-cancer patients.

Authors:  Teresa L Deshields; Valentina Penalba; Jingxa Liu; James Avery
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Comorbidity Assessment in Skin Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study Comparing Medical Interview with a Patient-Reported Questionnaire.

Authors:  Erica H Lee; Rajiv I Nijhawan; Kishwer S Nehal; Stephen W Dusza; Amanda Levine; Amanda Hill; Christopher A Barker
Journal:  J Skin Cancer       Date:  2015-06-09

5.  Predicting postoperative complications of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients using random forest algorithm model.

Authors:  YiMing Chen; Wei Cao; XianChao Gao; HuiShan Ong; Tong Ji
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Development and validation of a new comorbidity index for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in Japan.

Authors:  Yukinori Takenaka; Norihiko Takemoto; Ryohei Oya; Naoki Ashida; Takahiro Kitamura; Kotaro Shimizu; Kazuya Takemura; Takahiro Michiba; Atsushi Hanamoto; Motoyuki Suzuki; Yoshifumi Yamamoto; Atsuhiko Uno; Hidenori Inohara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Geriatric assessment and 1-year mortality in older patients with cancer in the head and neck region: A cohort study.

Authors:  Floor J van Deudekom; Lilly-Ann van der Velden; Willianne H Zijl; Anouk S Schimberg; Anton P Langeveld; Marije Slingerland; Gerard J Blauw; Simon P Mooijaart
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy versus Postoperative Radiotherapy Alone for Larynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients with Lymphovascular Invasion: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Authors:  Shuting Yu; Yingying Zhu; Xiaohua Shi; Ke Hu; Chunmei Bai; Wenwen Diao; Xiaoli Zhu; Zhiqiang Gao; Xingming Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Patients with head and neck cancer: Are they frailer than patients with other solid malignancies?

Authors:  Linda Bras; Daphne A J J Driessen; Julius de Vries; Suzanne Festen; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Barbara L van Leeuwen; Geertruida H de Bock; Gyorgy B Halmos
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.520

10.  Prognostic implications of human papillomavirus type 16 status in non-oropharyngeal head and neck cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Yingying Zhu; Xin Xia; Liming Gao; Xiaoli Zhu; Wenwen Diao; Zhiyong Liang; Zhiqiang Gao; Xingming Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.