Literature DB >> 22449332

Cotreatment with darbepoetin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is efficient to recruit proangiogenic cell populations in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Hyun-Jae Kang1, Eun-Jung Yoon, Eun-Ju Lee, Min-Kyung Kim, Jung-Won Suh, Kyung-Woo Park, Hae-Young Lee, Kyoung Un Park, Young-Seok Cho, Bon-Kwon Koo, In-Ho Chae, Dong-Ju Choi, Kyu-Sup Han, Hyo-Soo Kim, Young-Bae Park.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To determine whether newer combination cytokine treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and darbepoetin can improve efficacy of stem cell therapy, we evaluated safety and peripheral blood stem/progenitor cell (PBSC) mobilizing effects of combination cytokine in comparison with G-CSF alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We randomized 60 patients with AMI into two groups under 2:1 ratio; combination treatment with darbepoetin and G-CSF (n = 41: Combicytokine group) and the G-CSF alone (n = 19: G-CSF group). After coronary angioplasty, G-CSF was treated for 3 days with dose of 10 μg/kg/day in both groups. Only in the combicytokine group, additional single intravenous injection of 4.5 μg/kg of darbepoetin was administrated immediate after coronary angioplasty. Combination cytokine treatment was well tolerated as was G-CSF alone. PBSCs were obtained by apheresis for intracoronary infusion after completion of cytokine treatment and were analyzed by flow cytometry. The purity of proangiogenic cells was higher in combination cytokine group than the G-CSF group. Specifically, proportion of CD34(+)/KDR(+) endothelial progenitor cells, CD3(+)/CD31(+) angiogenic T cells and Tie2(+)/CXCR4(+) cells in apheresis products were higher in the combicytokine group. These meant that the combicytokine treatment recruited PBSCs in higher purity and fewer unwanted inflammatory cells than G-CSF alone in apheresis products. Combination treatment with darbepoetin and G-CSF is safe and more efficient to mobilize and recruit proangiogenic cells than G-CSF alone in patients with AMI. ( TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT00501917).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22449332     DOI: 10.3727/096368911X627499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Transplant        ISSN: 0963-6897            Impact factor:   4.064


  5 in total

Review 1.  The hematopoietic system in the context of regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Christopher D Porada; Anthony J Atala; Graça Almeida-Porada
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 2.  Harms of off-label erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for critically ill people.

Authors:  Bita Mesgarpour; Benedikt H Heidinger; Dominik Roth; Susanne Schmitz; Cathal D Walsh; Harald Herkner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-25

3.  G-CSF enhances resolution of Staphylococcus aureus wound infection in an age-dependent manner.

Authors:  Aleah L Brubaker; Elizabeth J Kovacs
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 4.  Safety of off-label erythropoiesis stimulating agents in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bita Mesgarpour; Benedikt H Heidinger; Michael Schwameis; Calvin Kienbacher; Cathal Walsh; Susanne Schmitz; Harald Herkner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Are There Any Cardioprotective Effects or Safety Concerns of Erythropoietin in Patients With Myocardial Infarction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Wilford Jean-Baptiste; Amina Yusuf Ali; Bithaiah Inyang; Feeba Sam Koshy; Kitty George; Prakar Poudel; Roopa Chalasani; Mastiyage R Goonathilake; Sara Waqar; Sheeba George; Lubna Mohammed
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.