Literature DB >> 22449135

Short-term forgetting without interference.

Denis McKeown1, Tom Mercer.   

Abstract

In the 1st reported experiment, we demonstrate that auditory memory is robust over extended retention intervals (RIs) when listeners compare the timbre of complex tones, even when active or verbal rehearsal is difficult or impossible. Thus, our tones have an abstract timbre that resists verbal labeling, they differ across trials so that no "standard" comparison stimulus is built up, and the spectral change to be discriminated is very slight and therefore does not shift stimuli across verbal categories. Nonetheless, performance in this nonverbal immediate memory task was better at short (1-, 2-, or 4-s) than long (8-, 16-, or 32-s) RIs, an outcome predicted by temporal distinctiveness theory whereby at long RIs, tones are closer in time to tones on previous trials. We reject this account in the 2nd experiment, where we demonstrate that the ratio of RI to intertrial interval makes absolutely no difference to performance. We suggest that steady forgetting is consistent with a psychoacoustically derived conception of an auditory memory (the timbre memory model) that embodies time-based forgetting in the absence of feature-specific interference. 2012 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22449135     DOI: 10.1037/a0027749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  13 in total

1.  The role of temporal delay and repeated prospective memory cue exposure on the deactivation of completed intentions.

Authors:  Moritz Walser; Franziska Plessow; Thomas Goschke; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-07

Review 2.  Decay theory of immediate memory: From Brown (1958) to today (2014).

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 3.  Neural circuits in auditory and audiovisual memory.

Authors:  B Plakke; L M Romanski
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Maintenance of auditory-nonverbal information in working memory.

Authors:  Alexander Soemer; Satoru Saito
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

5.  Differences between presentation methods in working memory procedures: a matter of working memory consolidation.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  No recovery of memory when cognitive load is decreased.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Evie Vergauwe; Garrett A Hinrichs; Christopher L Blume; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Time-based loss in visual short-term memory is from trace decay, not temporal distinctiveness.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Lauren R Spiegel; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Attention in working memory: attention is needed but it yearns to be free.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Decay uncovered in nonverbal short-term memory.

Authors:  Tom Mercer; Denis McKeown
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

10.  Active versus passive maintenance of visual nonverbal memory.

Authors:  Denis McKeown; Jessica Holt; Jean-Francois Delvenne; Amy Smith; Benjamin Griffiths
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.