Literature DB >> 22449035

Using regression equations built from summary data in the psychological assessment of the individual case: extension to multiple regression.

John R Crawford1, Paul H Garthwaite, Annie K Denham, Gordon J Chelune.   

Abstract

Regression equations have many useful roles in psychological assessment. Moreover, there is a large reservoir of published data that could be used to build regression equations; these equations could then be employed to test a wide variety of hypotheses concerning the functioning of individual cases. This resource is currently underused because (a) not all psychologists are aware that regression equations can be built not only from raw data but also using only basic summary data for a sample, and (b) the computations involved are tedious and prone to error. In an attempt to overcome these barriers, Crawford and Garthwaite (2007) provided methods to build and apply simple linear regression models using summary statistics as data. In the present study, we extend this work to set out the steps required to build multiple regression models from sample summary statistics and the further steps required to compute the associated statistics for drawing inferences concerning an individual case. We also develop, describe, and make available a computer program that implements these methods. Although there are caveats associated with the use of the methods, these need to be balanced against pragmatic considerations and against the alternative of either entirely ignoring a pertinent data set or using it informally to provide a clinical "guesstimate." Upgraded versions of earlier programs for regression in the single case are also provided; these add the point and interval estimates of effect size developed in the present article.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22449035     DOI: 10.1037/a0027699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  9 in total

Review 1.  Neuropsychological Assessment: Past and Future.

Authors:  Kaitlin B Casaletto; Robert K Heaton
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  Multi-Racial Normative Data for Lobar and Subcortical Brain Volumes in Old Age: Korean and Caucasian Norms May Be Incompatible With Each Other.

Authors:  Yu Yong Choi; Jang Jae Lee; Kyu Yeong Choi; Uk-Su Choi; Eun Hyun Seo; Il Han Choo; Hoowon Kim; Min-Kyung Song; Seong-Min Choi; Soo Hyun Cho; Youngshik Choe; Byeong C Kim; Kun Ho Lee
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches.

Authors:  Laiss Bertola; Isabela Judith Martins Benseñor; Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Paulo Caramelli; Sandhi Maria Barreto; Arlinda Barbosa Moreno; Rosane Harter Griep; Maria Carmen Viana; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Claudia Kimie Suemoto
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-04-29

4.  Robust demographically-adjusted normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Results from the systolic blood pressure intervention trial.

Authors:  Bonnie C Sachs; Gordon J Chelune; Stephen R Rapp; Ashley M Couto; James J Willard; Jeff D Williamson; Kaycee M Sink; Laura H Coker; Sarah A Gaussoin; Tanya R Gure; Alan J Lerner; Linda O Nichols; Carolyn H Still; Virginia G Wadley; Nicholas M Pajewski
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Cognition or genetics? Predicting Alzheimer's disease with practice effects, APOE genotype, and brain metabolism.

Authors:  Javier Oltra-Cucarella; Miriam Sánchez-SanSegundo; Rosario Ferrer-Cascales
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.133

6.  Practice and retest effects in longitudinal studies of cognitive functioning.

Authors:  Richard N Jones
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2015-03-29

7.  FreeSurfer subcortical normative data.

Authors:  Olivier Potvin; Abderazzak Mouiha; Louis Dieumegarde; Simon Duchesne
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2016-10-14

Review 8.  Assessing individual-level change in dementia research: a review of methodologies.

Authors:  Aja Louise Murray; Marlena Vollmer; Ian J Deary; Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Tom Booth
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.982

9.  Correction for retest effects across repeated measures of cognitive functioning: a longitudinal cohort study of postoperative delirium.

Authors:  Annie M Racine; Yun Gou; Tamara G Fong; Edward R Marcantonio; Eva M Schmitt; Thomas G Travison; Sharon K Inouye; Richard N Jones
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.