Literature DB >> 22448903

The impact of processing time on the bizarreness and orthographic distinctiveness effects.

Yannick Gounden1, Serge Nicolas.   

Abstract

The bizarreness effect and the orthographic distinctiveness effect (OD effect) are typical cases of secondary-distinctiveness-based effects. This study tested the simple attentional account or processing time hypothesis as a possible explanation of the bizarreness effect and the OD effect. In the bizarreness effect literature, this hypothesis gained support by some studies but was also discredited by other research. In light of these conflicting results, Experiment 1 was devised to test the processing time hypothesis in the bizarreness effect by using black-and-white concrete images and manipulating the time allotted for processing the stimuli (500 ms, 1000 ms, 3000 ms). Concerning the OD effect, no research has directly investigated the impact of processing time by examining the effect under varying amounts of study time. Experiment 2 was thus devised to investigate this same hypothesis in the OD effect and time allotted for processing the stimuli was manipulated (250 ms, 500 ms, 1000 ms, 3000 ms). Results did not support the processing time hypothesis since the magnitude of the bizarreness effect and of the OD effect was not modulated by the amount of time allotted for processing the stimuli. We refer to alternative explanations to account for these two secondary-distinctiveness-based effects.
© 2012 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology © 2012 The Scandinavian Psychological Associations.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22448903     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00945.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Psychol        ISSN: 0036-5564


  3 in total

1.  Limits to the attentional boost effect: the moderating influence of orthographic distinctiveness.

Authors:  Pietro Spataro; Neil W Mulligan; Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  Memory for expectation-violating concepts: the effects of agents and cultural familiarity.

Authors:  Michaela Porubanova; Daniel Joel Shaw; Ryan McKay; Dimitris Xygalatas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  How does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings?

Authors:  Sébastien Pacton; Amélie Sobaco; Michel Fayol; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.