Literature DB >> 22448195

Biomedical applications of graphene.

He Shen1, Liming Zhang, Min Liu, Zhijun Zhang.   

Abstract

Graphene exhibits unique 2-D structure and exceptional phyiscal and chemical properties that lead to many potential applications. Among various applications, biomedical applications of graphene have attracted ever-increasing interests over the last three years. In this review, we present an overview of current advances in applications of graphene in biomedicine with focus on drug delivery, cancer therapy and biological imaging, together with a brief discussion on the challenges and perspectives for future research in this field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioimaging.; biomedical application; biosensing; drug delivery; graphene

Year:  2012        PMID: 22448195      PMCID: PMC3311234          DOI: 10.7150/thno.3642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theranostics        ISSN: 1838-7640            Impact factor:   11.556


Introduction

Graphene, a novel two-dimensional nanomaterial composed of sp2-bonded carbon atoms, possesses a number of extraordinary electronic, optical, thermal and mechanical properties 1-5. With the rapid deveolopment of synthesis and functionalization approches, graphene and its related derivatives have shown outstanding potentials in many fields, such as nanoelectronics 6, composite materials 7-11, energy technology (for examples, fuel cell, supercapacitor, hydrogen storage) 12-14, sensors 15, and catalysis 16, which have been summarised by several review articles 17-21. Beyond the applications aforementioned, the biomedical application of graphene is a relative new area with significant potential. Since the seminal report on use of graphene oxide (GO) as an efficient nanocarrier for drug delivery by Dai et al. 22 in 2008, the first study on graphene for biomedical applications, a lot of interesting work has been carried out to explore the use of graphene for widespread biomedical applications, ranging from drug/gene delivery, biological sensing and imaging, antibacterial materials, to biocompatible scaffold for cell culture. The intensive research on the bioapplications of graphene and its derivatives is due to many fascinating properties, such as high specific surface area (2630 m2/g), exceptional eletronic conductivity (mobility of charge carriers, 200,000 cm2 V-1 s-1), thermal conductivity (~5000 W/m/K), mechanical strength (Young's modulus, ~1100 Gpa) of graphene, and, intrinsic biocompatibility, low cost and scalable production, and facile biological/chemical functionalization of GO 20,21. The exciting achievements obtained in the last 3 years have been reviewed by Liu et al. 17,23, Li, Lin and coworkers 18, and Jiang 20. Therefore we do not intend to give a systematic and detailed review on this topic, instead, we will give a brief overview of recent work that is updated and complementary to those described in the reviews mentioned above.

2. Drug/Gene Delivery and Cancer Therapy

2.1 Drug delivery

GO, produced by vigorous oxidation of graphite by Hummers method 24, is an ideal nanocarrier for efficient drug and gene delivery. GO used for drug delivery is usually 1-3 layers (1-2 nm thick), with size ranging from a few nanometers to several hundred nanometers 19,25,26. The unique structural features, such as large and planar sp2 hybridized carbon domain, high specific surface area (2630 m2/g), and enriched oxygen-containing groups, render GO excellent biocompatibility, and physiological solubility and stability, and capability of loading of drugs or genes via chemical conjugation or physisorption approaches. Moreover, the reactive COOH and OH groups GO bears facilitate conjugation with various systems, such as polymers 27, biomolecules (biotargeting ligand 26, DNA 28, protein 29-31), quantum dots 32, Fe3O4 nanoparticles 33, and others 34), imparting GO with multi-functionalities and multi-modalities for diverse biological and medical applications. Inspired by the ideas for carbon nanotubes-based drug delivery 23,35-39, Dai et al. explored for the first time nanoscale GO (NGO) as a novel and efficient nanocarrier for delivery of water insoluble aromatic anticancer drugs into cells 22. In their approach, NGO was first conjugated with an amine-terminated six armed polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecule, followed by loading of a water insoluble anticancer drug, SN38 onto NGO surface by simple non-covalent adsorption via π-π stacking. The PEG-functionalized NGO loaded with SN38 exhibited high cytotoxicity for HCT-116 cells, 1000-fold more potent than CPT-11. In another work, the same group studied targeted delivery of chemical drugs into cells by using a Rituxan (CD20+ antibody) conjugated NGO-PEG 26 (Figure 1). This work further demonstrated that the drug release from the GO surface was pH dependent, suggesting the possibility of pH-controlled drug release. The pH-sensitive drug release behavior from many different GO-based drug delivery systems was also studied later by Chen et al. 40, Shi and colleagues 9, Misra et al. 41, and our group 42. Apart from pH-activated drug release, recently Pan and colleagues 43 developed a thermo-responsive drug delivery cargo, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) grafted graphene sheets.
Figure 1

A. Schematic illustration of DOX loading onto NGO-PEG conjugated with anti-CD20 antibody; B. In vitro cytotoxicity at different DOX concentration showing targeted delivery of DOX into specific cells. C. NIR fluorescence image of targeted cells treated with the NGO-PEG of Rituxan.26 © 2008. Reproduced with kind permission from Springer Science+Business Media and Tsinghua Press.

Combined use of multiple drugs is a widely adopted clinical practice in cancer therapy to overcome drug resistance of cancer cells 44,45. However, few reports on nanomaterial-based drug delivery systems for controlled loading and delivery of multiple drugs can be found in the literature due to technical difficulties. To address this issue, our group 42 explored the feasibility of GO as a nanocarrier for controlled loading and targeted delivery of mixed chemical drugs. In our approach, folic acid and SO3H groups conjugated GO was co-loaded with two chemical drugs, doxorubicin (DOX) and camptothecin (CPT) via π-π stacking in a controlled way. We revealed that combined loading of the two drugs by GO with folic acid ligand exhibits specific targeting and much higher cytotoxicity to MCF-7 cells, human breast cancer cells with folic acid receptors, and more importantly, remarkably higher cytotoxicity than that loaded with only one drug. The exploration of GO-based drug delivery expands from anticancer drugs to other drugs for non-cancer diseases treatment. Most recently, Rana et al. 46 reported the delivery of an anti-inflammatory drug, Ibuprofen, by using a chitosan-grafted GO. In this case, the loading rate of Ibuprofen on the GO sheet was determined to be 9.7%. Furthermore, the work demonstrates that controlled drug release can be achieved by adjustment of pH value. To enhance the anticancer effect, Yang and colleagues 47 designed and prepared a magnetic- and bio- dual targeting drug delivery cargo based on GO-Fe3O4 nanoparticle hybrid. The in vitro experiments indicated specific targeting of the multifunctional drug carriers by SK3 human breast cancer cells. Clearly, in vivo study is desired to demonstrate the performance of this external magnetic field-guided and bio-targeted drug delivery system.

2.2 Gene delivery

Gene therapy is a novel and promising approach to treat various diseases caused by genetic disorders, including cystic fibrosis, Parkinson's disease, and cancer 48. Successful gene therapy requires a gene vector that protects DNA from nuclease degradation and facilitates cellular uptake of DNA with high transfection efficiency 49. The major challenge facing the development of gene therapy is lack of efficient and safe gene vectors 50. Recently Liu et al. 51 and our group 52 studied gene delivery using polyethylenimine (PEI)-modified GO (PEI-GO), the procedure of which is shown in Figure 2A. GO conjugated with positively charged PEI allows condensation of plasmid DNA onto the surface of GO sheet through electrostatic interaction arising from the cationic polymer. Liu and colleagues 51 examined the transfection efficiency of GO-PEI-10K and GO-PEI-1.2K and compared with the unbound polymers PEI-10K and PEI-1.2K, respectively, as shown in Figure 2B. Their experiment indicates that grafting PEI to GO not only significantly lowered the cytotoxicity of the cationic polymer, but also improved the transfection efficiency of the polymer. We also found much higher luciferase expression in HeLa cells with PEI-GO/pGL-3 complexes (2.75 × 109 RLU/mg protein ) than that of PEI/pGL-3 complexes (2.07 × 109), and high DNA transfection efficiency by PEI-GO in HeLa cells even in the presence of 10% FBS 52. This observation is somewhat surprising since PEI is widely used in gene transfection due to its high transfection efficiency, PEI grafted to other systems usually leads to inevitable decrease in transfection efficiency. And, serum protein can hinder cellular uptake, and therefore often reduces the transfection efficiency 52. Much work has to be done to understand the phenomenon. All together, the findings by Liu and us suggest that PEI-GO is a promising candidate for efficient gene delivery.
Figure 2

A. Schematic illustration of synthesizing GO-PEI-DNA complexes via electrostatic interactions. B. Confocal fluorescence images of EGFP transfected HeLa cells using PEI-1.2k (a), GO-PEI-1.2k (b), PEI-10k (c), and GO-PEI-10k (d) at different N/P ratios from 10 to 80. 51 Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Most recently a research group from Singapore 53 reported synthesis of chitosan-functionalized GO (GO-CS) sheets and their application for drug/gene delivery. This work shows that GO-CS sheets have a high drug payload, and the CPT-loaded GO-CS exhibits better cancer cell killing ability than the pure CPT. At the same time, GO-CS could condense plasmd DNA into stable nanoparticles, which show reasonable DNA transfection efficiency in HeLa cells at certain nitrogen/phosphate ratio. Further work on simultaneous loading and delivery of chemical drug and gene by the GO-CS nanocarrier for combined chemo- and gene- therapy is highly desired, to gain an enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Our group studied sequential delivery of DOX and Bcl-2 targeted siRNA to HeLa cells using a PEI-GO nanocarrier 54 (Figure 3). Briefly, HeLa cells were first incubated with the GO-PEI loaded with Bcl-2 targeted siRNA for 5h, and the incubation was continued for another 43 h after the fresh medium was replaced. The cells were then treated with DOX-loaded PEI-GO complexes for 24 h. The cytotoxicity assay reveals that the PEI-GO/Bcl-2 targeted siRNA complexes dramatically enhanced the cytotoxicity of the PEI-GO/DOX, compared to the PEI-GO/scrambled siRNA complexes, as evidenced by remarkable decrease in IC50 of DOX, due to strong synergistic anti-cancer effect of the PEI-GO/DOX and PEI-GO/Bcl-2 targeted siRNA.
Figure 3

A. Scheme showing sequential delivery of siRNA and anticancer drugs by PEI-GO. B. Relative viability of HeLa cells treated with (1) PEI-GO/Bcl-2 targeted siRNA, and (2) PEI-GO/scrambled siRNA, followed by incubation with PEI-GO/DOX. C. IC50 of DOX for the HeLa cells sequentially incubated with (1) PEI-GO/Bcl-2 targeted siRNA and PEI-GO/DOX, and (2) PEI-GO/scrambled siRNA and PEI-GO/DOX. The result indicates that PEI-GO/Bcl-2-targeted siRNA complexes significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of the PEI-GO/DOX. 54 Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Reproduced with permission.

2.3. Cancer Therapy

Much success has been made on exploration of graphene in drug delivery by in vitro test, as we discussed above. For clinical cancer and other disease treatment, the in vivo behavior of graphene loaded with drugs must be investigated. Liu and colleagues 55 for the first time studied in vivo tumor uptake and photothermal therapy with PEGylated GO using xenograft tumor mouse models. They observed very high tumor uptake of the PEG-modified GO due to highly efficient tumor passive targeting of GO caused by EPR effect. Moreover, under the low-power near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation on the tumor, a highly efficient tumor destruction was achieved, taking the use of strong absorbance of GO in the NIR region (Figure 4).
Figure 4

A. Schematic illustration of PEG functionalized NGS and labeled by Cy7. B. Photos of tumors on mice after various treatments indicated. The laser irradiated tumor on NGS injected mouse was completely destructed.55 Reprinted with permission from ref.55. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.

Later, Markovic et al. 56 compared the photothermal anticancer activity of NIR-excited graphene and carbon nanotubes. Despite of its lower NIR-absorbing capacity, polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated graphene nanoparticles display higher photothermal responsiveness, and induce more photothermal cell death because of oxidative stress and mitochondrial depolarization and caspase activation leaking cytochrome C of human glioma cells in vitro than single-walled CNT 57. Zhang and coworkers 58 developed a NGO-PEG-DOX for the anti-tumor effect in vitro and in vivo by combination of photothermal- and chemo-therapies. The experiment revealed that the combined chemo-photothermal therapy exhibited synergistic effect that leads to better cancer killing effect than chemotherapy or photothermal therapy alone. Cui and his coworkers 59 reported application of folic acid and sulfonic acid conjugated GO loaded with porphyrin photosensitizers for targeting photodynamic therapy (PDT). PDT is a novel and efficient technique to treat diseases including cancers in clinical practice because of its attractive traits 60 with low toxicity and high stability under physiological conditions. In their experiment, GO was loaded with a Chlorin e6 photosensitizer with high efficiency via hydrophobic interactions and π-π stacking. Such system, significantly increases the accumulation of photosensitizers in tumor cells, leading to a remarkable concentration-depended photodynamic effect on cancer cells under irradiation. Liu and colleagues 61 further studied photothermally assisted PDT using GO loaded with a photosensitizer, Chlorine e6, and demonstrated that such combined treatment yields remarkably improved cancer killing effect. In summary, the structural features and facile chemical processing and modification of GO provide fascinating opportunities for loading and delivery of a variety of molecules, from chemical drugs, genes, and photosensitizers, and beyond, for cancer and other disease treatment. The research in this area so far is encouraging, but far from mature, more exciting accomplishments will be made, moving forward toward the eventual clinical use.

3. Biosensing and Bioimaging

3.1 Biosensing

Graphene derivatives, including pristine graphene, GO, chemically reduced GO (rGO) 62 and doped graphene 63 have been intensively studied for their widespread applications in biosensing and detection of biomolecules such as thrombin 64, ATP 65, oligonucleotide 66, amino acid 67, and dopamine 68. Several types of GO-based biosensors have been built, which include: (1) Making use of super efficient fluorescence quenching ability of graphene, some novel fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) based biosensors have been developed 64,65,69; (2) Based on the unique electronic property of graphene, FET type biosensors have been made 70; (3) Controllable self-assembling of graphene-biomolecules allows to build highly ultrasensitive biosensors for detection of DNA and other molecules 66,71-73; (4) As a matrix for detection of molecules, graphene-based nanoplatform for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been reported 67,74; and (5) GO-based novel biosensors via electrochemical principle have been constructed by taking use of its huge surface area, good electrical conductivity, and excellent capability of loading various biomolecules via chemical or physical interactions 68,75. All of these have been thoroughly reviewed by Li, Lin and colleagues 18, Jiang 20, and others 17,19,21,76. Therefore we will not go into the details in this overview.

3.2 Bioimaging

Exploration of feasibilities of GO in biological imaging with optical and magnetic modalities has just started recently 19,26,33,77. Dai et al. 26 for the first time examined cellular uptake of PEG-modified GO loaded with chemical drugs using intrinsic fluorescence of GO in the NIR region. Later, another group 78 studied gelatin-grafted rGO labeled with a fluorescence dye for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Recently researchers have begun to prepare smaller GO (with a size of 10 nm or less), often referred to as graphene quantum dots (GQDs), from chemical oxidation of graphite 79-81 and “bottom up” approach 82. These GQDs exhibit intrinsic fluorescence, and can be used for bioimaging purpose. Pan et al. 79 synthesized GQDs with blue emission color through hydrothermal cutting of GO. These as-obtained GQDs are weakly fluorescent (quantum yield less than 10%), much lower than conventional organic dyes and II-VI type QDs, which hampers their practical bioimaging applications. To overcome this problem, Eda et al. 80 treated the chemically produced GQDs by a brief exposure to hydrazine vapor and observed significantly improved fluorescence. Surface functionalization of GQD with alkylamine also gives rise to dramatically enhanced fluorescence 81. Most recently, Zhu et al. 83 (Figure 5.) and our group 84 explored the possibility of GQDs for cellular imaging. Compared with CdSe and other II-VI type QDs, GQDs show excellent biocompatibility, physiological solubility, and low cytotoxicity, and can be used directly for intracellular imaging without the necessity for further surface processing or functionalization. In addition, GQDs possess unique optical properties such as pH dependent and upconversion fluorescence behaviors 85. The upconversion fluorescence property of GQDs allows them to be excited at NIR region, making both in vitro and in vivo bio-detection and imaging efficient, safe, and without interference from auto-fluorescence from the cells, organs, or tissues in this region 86.
Figure 5

A. AFM image of the GQDs; B. Fluorescence spectra of aqueous solution of GQDs excited at 375 nm. Inset: aqueous solution of GQDs under UV light; C. cellular imaging of GQDs imaged under 405 nm; D. Cytoxicity of GQDs. 83 Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Like fluorescence imaging technique, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in clinical practice 87,88. Recently our group 33 reported the synthesis of composites of dextran-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) and GO (Fe3O4-GO) as T-weighted contrast agent for efficient cellular MRI. The Fe3O4-GO composites we prepared possess good physiological stability and low cytotoxicity. Compared with the isolated Fe3O4 NPs, the Fe3O4-GO composites exhibit significantly enhanced cellular MRI, able to detect cells at iron concentration of 5 µg mL-1 with cell density of 2 × 105 cells mL-1, and at the iron concentration of 20 µg mL-1 with cell density of 1000 cells mL-1.

4. Other applications

4.1 GO-based antibacterial materials

Fan et al. 89 prepared macroscopic freestanding GO and rGO paper from their suspension by vacuum filtration technique, and found that these papers exhibit strong antibacterial effect. Considering the scalability and low cost of the graphene-based antibacterial paper, this work opens new opportunities for the use of GO in environmental and clinical applications. Later Akhavan et al. 90 investigated anti-bacterial effect of graphene nanosheets in the form of nanowalls deposited on stainless steel substrates for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative models of bacteria. It is interesting that the Gram-negative Escherichia coli bacteria with an outer membrane were more resistant to the cell membrane damage caused by the nanowalls than the Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus lacking the outer membrane. Moreover, the rGO nanowalls were more toxic to the bacteria than the GO nanowalls. The better antibacterial activity of the rGO nanowalls, according to the researchers, is due to the better charge transfer between the bacteria and the more sharpened edges of the rGO nanowalls, during the contact interaction. Liu et al. 91 further probed the mechanism of antibacterial effect of 4 types of graphene derivatives, graphite (Gt), graphite oxide (GtO), GO, and rGO. They found that the antibacterial activities decrease in the order of GO, rGO, Gt, and GtO. They assign the antibacterial effect to both membrane and oxidative stress, and then proposed a three-step mechanism for the antibacterial effect, similar to that of carbon nanotube. This work is important for us to understand the GO-bacteria interaction and to guide development of better graphene-based antibacterial materials.

4.2 GO-based scaffold for cell culture

Min group studied the behavior of NIH-3T3 fibroblasts as a model of mammalian cells growing on a supported film of GO 92. Their work suggests that GO film induces no significantly harmful effect on the mammalian cells with respect to adhesion, and exhibits remarkably high gene transfection efficiency, 250% that of cells grown on a cover glass substrate. The result indicated the potential application of GO as a surface coating material for implant. A graphene/chitosan film produced by solution casting method has also been investigated as scaffold materials in tissue engineering 8. The work indicates that the graphene-based film does not hamper the proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). Instead, it accelerates their specific differentiation into bone cells in a controlled manner through the use of growth factors and osteogenic inducers, suggesting the potential use for proliferation and transplantation of stem cells and their specific differentiation into muscles, bones, and cartilages for bone regeneration therapy 93 (Figure 7). Another study 94 revealed that chemical vapor deposition (CVD) grown graphene substrate is biocompatible for human osteoblasts as well as for hMSCs with higher proliferation of cell, compared to SiO2 substrate, and stimulates the growth and differentiation of cells.
Figure 7

Graphene substrate for osteogenic differentiation. A. Optical image of graphene-coated Si/SiO2 chip, showing the graphene boundary. B. Osteocalcin (OCN) marker showing bone cell formation on the same chip only on the graphene-coated area; C-D. Alizarin red quantification deriving from hMSCs grown for 15 days on substrates with/without graphene as well as with/ without BMP-2. E-H. PET substrate stained with alizarin red showing calcium deposits due to osteogenesis. 93 Reprinted with permission from ref.93. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.

Inspired by the work mentioned above, Tang and Cheng et al 95 investigated CVD-grown graphene film as a substrate of neurites, one of the key structures for neural functions during the development in a mouse hippocampal culture model. Their results indicate that the neurite numbers average length on graphene film were significantly enhanced during 2-7 days after cell seeding compared with tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) substrates. Moreover, GAP-43 expression was greatly enhanced in graphene group compared to TCPS group, due likely to the boost of neurite sprouting and outgrowth. This study suggests the potential application of pristine graphene as a novel material for neural interfacing. The interesting yet preliminary work described above suggests the potential applications of graphene as antibacterial materials and scaffold materials for cell culture.

5. Conclusions and perspectives

As in many other fields, the research on biomedical applications of graphene has seen dramatic progress, and is expanding rapidly, yet mostly in its initial stage. The advances made in this area so far are exciting and encouraging, the challenges we face, however, are also very huge and must be overcome. One of such challenges is thorough and profound understanding of graphene-cell (or tissue, organ) interactions, especially the cellular uptake mechanism. Such knowledge certainly facilitates development of more efficient graphene or GO-based nanoplatform for drug delivery, biosensing and other applications, which, however, is still lacking at the moment. The toxicity of graphene and GO, at in vitro and in vivo level, is another major concern. At the current stage there are only a few publications in this regard 96-102. The preliminary results indicate that the physicochemical properties such as flat shape and charges, are closely related to the cytotoxicity, and affect in vivo biodistribution and fate of GO 17. The mechanisms of the in vitro biotoxicity caused by graphene are related to oxidative stress and damage of cell membrane. Clearly, a systematic study is highly desired to address the safety concerns before practical applications of graphene in biomedicine. The current research on delivery of drugs, genes, we expect, will extend to that of proteins, growth factors, and other biomolecules, either single or combined use of the aforementioned biomolecules, for cancer and other disease therapies. Given its structural features and exceptional physicochemical properties, design and construction of GO-based theranostic platform with multifunctionalities and multimodalities is a new direction to pursue. Definitely, these goals can only be reached by the joint efforts from chemistry, biomedicine, materials sciences, and nanotechnology. To this end, development of suitable chemical synthesis and functionalization approaches for precise control over size, size distribution, morphology, structural defects, and oxygen-containing groups of GO is urgently needed, as this is closely correlated to the performance of the GO-based nanomaterials for biomedical applications, and the safety issues as well. For GO-based biosensing based on FRET principle, tuning electronic property of GO by controllable modification and reduction of originally prepared GO, and development of techniques to integrate GO into practical devices having high sensitivity, selectivity with acceptable reproducibility, reliability and low cost remain a big challenge. As for GO-based bioimaging, although the GQDs have distinct advantages over II-IV QDs in their intrinsic biocompatibility, safety and facile functionalization, the weak fluorescence intensity (with quantum yield about 10%) and broad emission band (with bandwidth beyond 100 nm) are certainly major obstacles for their use in biodetection and labeling, so more efforts must be paid to prepare GQDs with a good control of size and size distribution, the surface defects, and their functionalization, to improve fluorescence quantum yield and other important properties. The research on graphene/GO-based scaffold materials for cell culture is a relatively new direction that deserves special attention. The study in this field so far demonstrated that graphene and GO are able to accelerate the growth, differentiation, and proliferation of stem cells, and therefore hold great promise in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and other biomedical fields. We have selectively reviewed the surprisingly rapid and exciting advances in the biomedical applications of graphene with focus on drug delivery and bioimaging, made in the last few years. This trend, we believe, will continue and even speed up in the years to come.
  76 in total

1.  Carbon Nanotubes in Biology and Medicine: In vitro and in vivo Detection, Imaging and Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Zhuang Liu; Scott Tabakman; Kevin Welsher; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  Nano Res       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 8.897

2.  Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films.

Authors:  K S Novoselov; A K Geim; S V Morozov; D Jiang; Y Zhang; S V Dubonos; I V Grigorieva; A A Firsov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Applications of carbon nanotubes in drug delivery.

Authors:  Alberto Bianco; Kostas Kostarelos; Maurizio Prato
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Membraneless enzymatic biofuel cells based on graphene nanosheets.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Subbiah Alwarappan; Zhongfang Chen; Xiangxing Kong; Chen-Zhong Li
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  Graphene in mice: ultrahigh in vivo tumor uptake and efficient photothermal therapy.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Shuai Zhang; Guoxin Zhang; Xiaoming Sun; Shuit-Tong Lee; Zhuang Liu
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 6.  Graphene-based materials in electrochemistry.

Authors:  Da Chen; Longhua Tang; Jinghong Li
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Nitrogen-doped graphene and its application in electrochemical biosensing.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Yuyan Shao; Dean W Matson; Jinghong Li; Yuehe Lin
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 15.881

8.  Intracellular imaging with a graphene-based fluorescent probe.

Authors:  Cheng Peng; Wenbing Hu; Yuntao Zhou; Chunhai Fan; Qing Huang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 13.281

9.  Functional graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for controlled loading and targeted delivery of mixed anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Liming Zhang; Jingguang Xia; Qinghuan Zhao; Liwei Liu; Zhijun Zhang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 10.  Graphene and graphene oxide: biofunctionalization and applications in biotechnology.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Zhaohui Li; Jun Wang; Jinghong Li; Yuehe Lin
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 19.536

View more
  117 in total

1.  Graphene oxide inhibits hIAPP amyloid fibrillation and toxicity in insulin-producing NIT-1 cells.

Authors:  Praveen Nedumpully-Govindan; Esteban N Gurzov; Pengyu Chen; Emily H Pilkington; William J Stanley; Sara A Litwak; Thomas P Davis; Pu Chun Ke; Feng Ding
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.676

2.  The effect of graphene substrate on osteoblast cell adhesion and proliferation.

Authors:  Ashkan Aryaei; Ahalapitiya H Jayatissa; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Preparation and functionalization of graphene nanocomposites for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Liangzhu Feng; Hao Hong; Weibo Cai; Zhuang Liu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Recent advances in graphene-based nanomaterials: properties, toxicity and applications in chemistry, biology and medicine.

Authors:  Jun Yao; Heng Wang; Min Chen; Mei Yang
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.833

5.  Concentration-dependent adsorption of organic contaminants by graphene nanosheets: quantum-mechanical models.

Authors:  Suman Lata
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Albumin (BSA) adsorption onto graphite stepped surfaces.

Authors:  Pamela Rubio-Pereda; J G Vilhena; Noboru Takeuchi; Pedro A Serena; Rubén Pérez
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Nanocaged platforms: modification, drug delivery and nanotoxicity. Opening synthetic cages to release the tiger.

Authors:  Mahdi Karimi; Parham Sahandi Zangabad; Fatemeh Mehdizadeh; Hedieh Malekzad; Alireza Ghasemi; Sajad Bahrami; Hossein Zare; Mohsen Moghoofei; Amin Hekmatmanesh; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 7.790

8.  Wet/Sono-Chemical Synthesis of Enzymatic Two-Dimensional MnO2 Nanosheets for Synergistic Catalysis-Enhanced Phototheranostics.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Wenpei Fan; Weizhong Zhang; Zhen Yang; Ling Li; Zhantong Wang; Ya-Ling Chiang; Yijing Liu; Liming Deng; Liangcan He; Zheyu Shen; Orit Jacobson; Maria A Aronova; Albert Jin; Jin Xie; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 30.849

9.  Dye-loaded ferritin nanocages for multimodal imaging and photothermal therapy.

Authors:  Peng Huang; Pengfei Rong; Albert Jin; Xuefeng Yan; Molly Gu Zhang; Jing Lin; Hao Hu; Zhe Wang; Xuyi Yue; Wanwan Li; Gang Niu; Wenbin Zeng; Wei Wang; Kechao Zhou; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  Impact of graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNMs) on the structural and functional conformations of hepcidin peptide.

Authors:  Krishna P Singh; Lokesh Baweja; Olaf Wolkenhauer; Qamar Rahman; Shailendra K Gupta
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.