| Literature DB >> 22448131 |
Eugenia Murawska-Ciałowicz1, Wojciech Bal, Lidia Januszewska, Marcin Zawadzki, Joanna Rychel, Jolanta Zuwała-Jagiełło.
Abstract
The genotioxic and carcinogenic effect of nickel probably results from its capacity to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and disturb the redox balance. The aim of the study was to find out if rats lacking spermatic protamine 2 are less susceptible to Ni(II) than mice. Consequently, the levels of malondialdehyde + 4 hydroxynonenal (MDA+4HDA) - markers of lipid peroxidation, as well as the level of reduced glutathione (GSH) were measured within the rat and mouse testes. Our results showed that the levels of lipid peroxidation markers were elevated in testicular homogenates of intoxicated mice without any changes in rats. GSH level was lower in the group of intoxicated mice comparing to the control without statistically significant changes in rats' homogenates. Moreover, the level of GSH in the testes of intoxicated mice was lower than in rats. On the basis of our results, it appears that Ni(II) can initiate oxidative stress in the testes of mice but not of rats and can reduce GSH level. Consequently, the antioxidative defense of the testes is reduced. Ni(II) that causes oxidative stress in the testes may also contribute to infertility.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22448131 PMCID: PMC3290116 DOI: 10.1100/2012/395741
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
MDA + 4HDA concentration (μmol/g of the tissue) in groups of intoxicated rats and mice and in control groups.
| Groups | Controls | Intoxicated | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rats ( | 339.62 ± 28.29 | 333.52 ± 54.69 |
|
| Mice ( | 579.8 ± 76.02 | 724.70 ± 90.74 |
|
| Significance |
|
|
Figure 1Concentration of lipid peroxidation markers in testicular homogenates of mice and rats. *P < 0.05 in comparison to the control, **P < 0.001 in comparison to both groups of rats.
GSH concentration (μmol/g of the tissue) in the groups of intoxicated rats and mice and in the control groups.
| Groups | Controls | Intoxicated | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rats ( | 56.92 ± 2.96 | 52.88 ± 3.25 |
|
| Mice ( | 65.46 ± 1.35 | 51.80 ± 1.85 |
|
| Significance |
|
|
Figure 2Concentration of reduced glutathione in testicular homogenates of rats and mice, # P = 0.05 in comparison to the mice control, ## P = 0.0029 in comparison to the control.