| Literature DB >> 22448096 |
Serhat Ozdoğan1, Dilara Kaman, Bengü Çobanoğlu Simşek.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of α-lipoic acid and coenzyme Q10 on plasma levels of lipids, asymmetric dimethylarginine, oxidative stress in fructose fed rats which provide a model of dietary-induced insulin resistance and to evaluate vascular changes developing in these rats by histologically. Male Sprague Dawley rats were used in this study. The animals were divided into 4 groups. Group 1 did not receive any medication and served as a control. Group 2 received a regular diet and water ad libitum and fructose was administered as % 10 solution in drinking water. Group 3 received α-lipoic acid (100 mg/kg/day) i.p. for 5 weeks and Group 4 received coenzyme Q10 (10 mg/kg/day) i.p. for 5 weeks. For determination of plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine, glutathione and malondialdehyde levels, high-performance liquid chromatography system was used. Homeostatic model assessment as a measure of insulin resistance was calculated. Lipid profile measurements were determined using enzymatic assay on an Auto analyzer. The high fructose diet was significantly associated with an increase in levels of plasma LDL, VLDL and total cholesterol and decrease in level of HDL cholesterol. Plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine, malondialdehyde and glutathione levels were also increase in these rats. α-lipoic acid or coenzyme Q10 supplementation was found to have some positive effect on these parameters. These findings were also demonstrated by morphological observation of the aorta. We demonstrated that administration of α-lipoic acid and coenzyme Q10 notably suppresses oxidative and nitrative stress, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance developing in fructose fed rats, a model of metabolic syndrome (MS). These positive effects of α-lipoic acid or coenzyme Q10 can be attributed to its antioxidant activity.Entities:
Keywords: ADMA; coenzyme Q10; metabolic syndrome; oxidative stress; α-lipoic acid
Year: 2011 PMID: 22448096 PMCID: PMC3303477 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.11-47
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Changes in body weight and serum lipids
| Group 1 (CONTROL) | Group 2 (FRU) | Group 3 (FRU + ALA) | Group 4 (FRU + CoQ10) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) (Initial) | 212.57 + 11.04 | 218.66 + 9.65 | 219.44 + 15.28 | 220.55 + 13.21 |
| Body weight (g) (Final) | 312.71 ± 6.15 | 362.11 ± 20.03a,b,c | 345.22 ± 13.31a | 342.11 ± 12.46a |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 98.57 ± 6.42 | 147.88 ± 8.97a | 115.44 ± 6.98a,e | 109.66 ± 4.58d,e |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 28.28 ± 3.19 | 59.88 ± 3.68a | 38.55 ± 6.10a,e | 34.22 ± 4.43f,e |
| VLDL-C (mg/dl) | 20.48 ± 1.37 | 33.97 ± 1.68a | 25.26 ± 1.54a,e | 24.82 ± 1.36a,e |
| Trigliserid (mg/dl) | 102.42 ± 6.87 | 169.88 ± 8.44a | 126.33 ± 7.71a,e | 124.11 ± 6.80a,e |
| Total-C (mg/dl) | 82.57 ± 4.15 | 118.22 ± 3.89a | 97.22 ± 8.52a,e | 96.00 ± 6.63a,e |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 34.14 ± 2.79 | 25.11 ± 4.13a | 35.77 ± 5.09e | 37.11 ± 4.07e |
ap<0.0001, compared with control; bp<0.05, compared with group 3; cp<0.01, compared with group 4; dp<0.005, compared with control; ep<0.0001, compared with group 2; fp<0.05, compared with control.
Effects of ALA and CoQ10 treatments on plasma variables in rats
| Group 1 (CONTROL) | Group 2 (FRU) | Group 3 (FRU + ALA) | Group 4 (FRU + CoQ10) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADMA (µmol/l) | 0.95 ± 0.21 | 2.51 ± 1.19a | 1.61 ± 0.27b | 1.39 ± 0.30c |
| SADMA (µmol/l) | 0.66 ± 0.14 | 0.87 ± 0.42 | 0.46 ± 0.09d,e | 0.75 ± 0.24 |
| ARJININ (µmol/l) | 81.39 ± 6.92 | 71.08 ± 8.35f | 74.54 ± 6.08 | 82.54 ± 11.56b |
| Insulin (ng/ml) | 0.41 ± .14 | 0.93 ± 0.14a | 0.68 ± 0.11a,g | 0.67 ± 0.12a,g |
| HOMA | 2.44 ± 0.98 | 8.19 ± 1.69a | 4.67 ± 1.01i,c | 4.41 ± 1.00h,g |
| Reduced glutathione (µmol/l) | 829.42 ± 35.00 | 682.44 ± 76.61a | 732.11 ± 38.72a,j | 757.88 ± 16.03h,k |
| Total glutathione (µmol/l) | 848.57 ± 34.23 | 736.11 ± 74.70a | 753.66 ± 42.06a | 778.66 ± 17.08h |
| MDA (µmol/l) | 1.98 ± 0.47 | 3.21 ± 0.47a | 2.66 ± 0.88f | 2.52 ± 0.21j |
| NO (µmol/ml) | 56.82 ± 10.39 | 84.67 ± 15.93a | 71.01 ± 14.12f,j | 71.71 ± 6.64f,j |
ap<0.0001, compared with control; bp<0.01, compared with group 2; cp<0.001, compared with group 2; dp<0.05, compared with group 4; ep<0.005, compared with group 2; fp<0.05, compared with control; gp<0.0001, compared with group 2; hp<0.01, compared with control; ip<0.001, compared with control; jp<0.05, compared with group 2; kp<0.005, compared with group 2.
Correlation HOMA and some of biochemical parameters
| ADMA | 0.55 | 0.001 |
| Reduced glutathione | –0.6 | 0.0001 |
| Total glutathione | –0.46 | 0.006 |
| NO | 0.44 | 0.009 |
Fig. 1Aorta in a rat from group 1 (HE ×200).
Fig. 2Perivascular inflammation in group 2 (HE ×400).
Fig. 3Smooth muscle hypertrophy in group 2(HE ×400).
Fig. 4Edema in a vessel in group 2 (HE ×200).
Fig. 5Edema and infiltration is reduced in group 3 (HE ×100).
Fig. 6Edema and infiltration is also reduced in group 4 (HE ×100).