Literature DB >> 22448069

Closed retrograde retrieval of the distal broken segment of femoral cannulated intramedullary nail using a ball-tipped guide wire: A comment.

Sumit Arora1, Lalit Maini, Dhananjaya Sabat, Vk Gautam.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22448069      PMCID: PMC3308672          DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.93692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We read with great interest the article by Metikala and Mohammed entitled “Closed retrograde retrieval of the distal broken segment of femoral cannulated intramedullary nail using a ball-tipped guide wire”1 Apart from the technique mentioned in their article, various other techniques for retrieval of distal broken segment of femoral cannulated nail have been described in the literature.2–6 The authors have reported successful retrieval in eight cases of distal broken segment of femoral nail. However, we would like to make the following points: The authors’ idea of advancing the guide wire into the naïve knee joint seems questionable. The authors have mentioned that the retrieval was performed under image guidance to ensure exit in the knee joint at roughly a point that corresponds to the entry point for a retrograde femoral nail. But, it may not always be feasible to manoeuvre the small broken distal nail fragment with the help of a guide wire from the greater trochanter so as to achieve a desired exit in the knee joint. Moreover, coronal or sagittal plane angulations of the non-union site with broken nail in situ may further preclude the described method. Because it entails the first step of the described technique, one may not be able to proceed further with this method. The authors have identified the distal shaft as the most common fracture site and proximal of the two distal locking holes as the most common site of nail breakage. But, the illustrative case shown in the article had neither of these characteristics.1 The case had a large broken distal nail segment that could have been extracted by other methods without violating the knee joint. For some strange reasons, the authors have not mentioned few facts that are vital for any original article. Whether the study design was prospective or retrospective, whether an approval from the institutional review board was granted, details of the preoperative and postoperative knee functional scores and their statistical analysis. The authors had used a 5-mm cannulated drill bit from the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction set. We have made in vitro attempts to pass the ACL drill bits over the femoral interlocking nail guide wires of various manufacturers, but all in vain. The authors are requested to provide the manufacturers details of guide wires as well as drill bits for benefit of readers.
  5 in total

1.  Removal of broken Kuntscher's nail: an innovative close technique.

Authors:  Lalit Maini; Jagsir Singh; Pankaj Agarwal; Virender Kumar Gautum; Anil Kumar Dhal
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-12

2.  Removal of a multisegmental broken nail by close technique using a TEN nail.

Authors:  Lalit Maini; Nishant Jain; Jagsir Singh; Harpreet Singh; Ajay Bahl; Virender K Gautam
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-06

Review 3.  Surgeon versus metalwork--tips to remove a retained intramedullary nail fragment.

Authors:  Helen Whalley; Gethin Thomas; Peter Hull; Keith Porter
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Segmentally fractured femoral Küntscher nail extraction using a variety of techniques.

Authors:  Ayman M A Tadros; Piotr Blachut
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2009-03

5.  Closed retrograde retrieval of the distal broken segment of femoral cannulated intramedullary nail using a ball-tipped guide wire.

Authors:  Sreenivasulu Metikala; Riazuddin Mohammed
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.251

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Author's reply.

Authors:  Sreenivasulu Metikala; Riazuddin Mohammed
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.251

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.