Literature DB >> 22447988

Organ volume measurements: comparison between MRI and autopsy findings in infants following sudden unexpected death.

Olivier Prodhomme1, Fabienne Seguret, Laurent Martrille, Odile Pidoux, Gilles Cambonie, Alain Couture, Caroline Rouleau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of a semiautomated 3D volume reconstruction method for organ volume measurement by postmortem MRI.
METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board and the infants' parents gave their consent. Postmortem MRI was performed in 16 infants (1 month to 1 year of age) at 1.5 T within 48 h of their sudden death. Virtual organ volumes were estimated using the Myrian software. Real volumes were recorded at autopsy by water displacement. The agreement between virtual and real volumes was quantified following the Bland and Altman's method.
RESULTS: There was a good agreement between virtual and real volumes for brain (mean difference: -0.03% (-13.6 to +7.1)), liver (+8.3% (-9.6 to +26.2)) and lungs (+5.5% (-26.6 to +37.6)). For kidneys, spleen and thymus, the MRI/autopsy volume ratio was close to 1 (kidney: 0.87±0.1; spleen: 0.99±0.17; thymus: 0.94±0.25), but with a less good agreement. For heart, the MRI/real volume ratio was 1.29±0.76, possibly due to the presence of residual blood within the heart. The virtual volumes of adrenal glands were significantly underestimated (p=0.04), possibly due to their very small size during the first year of life. The percentage of interobserver and intraobserver variation was lower or equal to 10%, but for thymus (15.9% and 12.6%, respectively) and adrenal glands (69% and 25.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Virtual volumetry may provide significant information concerning the macroscopic features of the main organs and help pathologists in sampling organs that are more likely to yield histological findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22447988     DOI: 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2011-301309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  12 in total

Review 1.  The future of pediatric and perinatal postmortem imaging.

Authors:  Guillaume Gorincour; Laure Sarda-Quarello; Pierre-Eloi Laurent; Alison Brough; Guy N Rutty
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 2.  Perinatal and paediatric post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR): sequences and technique.

Authors:  Wendy Norman; Noorulhuda Jawad; Rod Jones; Andrew M Taylor; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  ESPR postmortem imaging task force: where we begin.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Rick R van Rijn; Elspeth H Whitby; Karl Johnson; Elka Miller; Martin Stenzel; Andrew Watt; Ajay Taranath; David H Perry
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 4.  Indications, advantages and limitations of perinatal postmortem imaging in clinical practice.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Andrew M Taylor; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-02

5.  A method for quantitative measurement of lumbar intervertebral disc structures: an intra- and inter-rater agreement and reliability study.

Authors:  Andreas Tunset; Per Kjaer; Shadi Samir Chreiteh; Tue Secher Jensen
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2013-08-16

6.  Statistical Analysis of Organ Morphometric Parameters and Weights in South Iranian Adult Autopsies.

Authors:  Saeid Gholamzadeh; Mohammad Zarenezhad; Mahmoud Montazeri; Marzieh Zareikordshooli; Ghazaleh Sadeghi; Abdorrasoul Malekpour; Sanaz Hoseni; Mohammadreza Bahrani; Razieh Hajatmand
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Postmortem imaging as a complementary tool for the investigation of cardiac death.

Authors:  Katarzyna Michaud; Pia Genet; Sara Sabatasso; Silke Grabherr
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2019-08-19

8.  A non-invasive method of quantifying pancreatic volume in mice using micro-MRI.

Authors:  Jose L Paredes; Abrahim I Orabi; Taimur Ahmad; Iman Benbourenane; Kimimasa Tobita; Sameh Tadros; Kyongtae T Bae; Sohail Z Husain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Local, semi-automatic, three-dimensional liver reconstruction or external provider? An analysis of performance and time expense.

Authors:  Markus Paschold; Florentine Huettl; Werner Kneist; Christian Boedecker; Alicia Poplawski; Tobias Huber; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: from research into clinical practice.

Authors:  S Addison; O J Arthurs; S Thayyil
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.