Literature DB >> 22447461

18F-FDG-PET evaluation of treatment response to neo-adjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Chenpeng Zhang1, Jinlu Tong, Xiaoguang Sun, Jianjun Liu, Yuting Wang, Gang Huang.   

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the utility of positron emission tomography (PET) using fluor-18-deoxyglucose (FDG) to predict the response of rectal cancer to neo-adjuvant therapy. All previously published studies on the role of FDG-PET in predicting the response of rectal cancer to neo-adjuvant therapy were collected. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using statistical software. A total of 28 studies, comprising 1,204 patients with rectal cancer, were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for FDG-PET predicting the response to therapy was 78% [95% confidence interval (CI): 75-82%], 66% (95% CI: 62-69%), 70% (95% CI; 66-73%) and 75% (95% CI: 71-0.79%), respectively. The included studies were of a relatively high methodological quality according to the QUADAS (quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews) criteria. Based on the subgroup analyses, there was no significant difference between the response index, the standardized uptake value and the visual response score in predicting the therapy response. However, the accuracy of the group that underwent PET scanning during therapy showed significantly higher values (sensitivity 86% and specificity 80%) than the group that was scanned after completion of the therapy. Therefore, FDG-PET is valuable for predicting the response of rectal carcinoma to neo-adjuvant therapy, and early evaluation of response during the therapy may be more promising. However, additional studies using prospective clinical trials will be required to assess the clinical benefit of this strategy.
Copyright © 2012 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22447461     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  12 in total

1.  "Watch and wait" approach in rectal cancer patients following complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy does not compromise oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Gürel Neşşar; Ali Eba Demirbağ; Hasan Cem Mısırlıoğlu; Semih Sezer
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 2.  Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung-Keun Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Organ preservation in rectal cancer patients following complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Long-term results in three patients.

Authors:  Gürel Neşşar
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 4.  Image-guided radiotherapy: from current concept to future perspectives.

Authors:  David A Jaffray
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing pathological response and survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Lucia Leccisotti; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Chiara de Waure; Antonella Stefanelli; Brunella Barbaro; Fabio Maria Vecchio; Claudio Coco; Roberto Persiani; Antonio Crucitti; Antonino Pio Tortorelli; Alessandro Giordano; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Early prediction of pathological response in locally advanced rectal cancer based on sequential 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Ruud van Stiphout; Adrien le Pogam; Guido Lammering; Dimitris Visvikis; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  FDG PET/CT radiomics for predicting the outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pierre Lovinfosse; Marc Polus; Daniel Van Daele; Philippe Martinive; Frédéric Daenen; Mathieu Hatt; Dimitris Visvikis; Benjamin Koopmansch; Frédéric Lambert; Carla Coimbra; Laurence Seidel; Adelin Albert; Philippe Delvenne; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanfen Cui; Xiaotang Yang; Zhongqiang Shi; Zhao Yang; Xiaosong Du; Zhikai Zhao; Xintao Cheng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer and the role of adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Valerie M Nelson; Al B Benson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  [Importance of FDG-PET/CT for surgery of rectal cancer].

Authors:  A Wiegering; K Herrmann; C Bluemel; A K Buck; C-T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.