INTRODUCTION: Pathologic stage is a critically important prognostic factor after radical cystectomy (RC) that is used to guide the use of secondary therapies. However, the risk of disease recurrence, for patients clinically diagnosed with muscle-invasive tumors who are found not to have muscle-invasive disease at RC are poorly defined. Therefore, we reviewed the long-term outcomes in patients who were downstaged to non-invasive urothelial carcinoma at time of RC. METHODS: We identified 1,177 consecutive patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who underwent radical cystectomy at our institution between 1980 and 1999 without neoadjuvant therapy. Postoperative disease recurrence and survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the impact of pathologic stage on survival. RESULTS: Pathologic downstaging to non-muscle invasive disease was identified in 538 (45.7 %) patients. The 10-year cancer-specific survival was 84.1, 77.4, 71.1 and 58.5 % for those with pT0, pTis, pT1 and pT2 tumors, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the risk of cancer-specific mortality was significantly decreased for patients with non-muscle invasive disease than those with organ-confined muscle invasion (RR-0.39; p = 0.002). There was no difference in disease-specific mortality among patients who had non-invasive (pT0, pTa, or pTis) disease (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Downstaging from clinical muscle-invasive bladder cancer to non-muscle invasive disease at RC is associated with a significant reduction in cancer-specific mortality. However, even patients with residual non-muscle invasive disease may suffer disease recurrence and require continued surveillance after surgery.
INTRODUCTION: Pathologic stage is a critically important prognostic factor after radical cystectomy (RC) that is used to guide the use of secondary therapies. However, the risk of disease recurrence, for patients clinically diagnosed with muscle-invasive tumors who are found not to have muscle-invasive disease at RC are poorly defined. Therefore, we reviewed the long-term outcomes in patients who were downstaged to non-invasive urothelial carcinoma at time of RC. METHODS: We identified 1,177 consecutive patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who underwent radical cystectomy at our institution between 1980 and 1999 without neoadjuvant therapy. Postoperative disease recurrence and survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the impact of pathologic stage on survival. RESULTS: Pathologic downstaging to non-muscle invasive disease was identified in 538 (45.7 %) patients. The 10-year cancer-specific survival was 84.1, 77.4, 71.1 and 58.5 % for those with pT0, pTis, pT1 and pT2 tumors, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the risk of cancer-specific mortality was significantly decreased for patients with non-muscle invasive disease than those with organ-confined muscle invasion (RR-0.39; p = 0.002). There was no difference in disease-specific mortality among patients who had non-invasive (pT0, pTa, or pTis) disease (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Downstaging from clinical muscle-invasive bladder cancer to non-muscle invasive disease at RC is associated with a significant reduction in cancer-specific mortality. However, even patients with residual non-muscle invasive disease may suffer disease recurrence and require continued surveillance after surgery.
Authors: H Tokunaga; S F Shariat; A E Green; R M Brown; J H Zhou; W F Benedict; S P Lerner Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: P Sagaster; J Flamm; M Flamm; A Mayer; G Donner; S Oberleitner; L Havelec; L Lepsinger; H Ludwig Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Philippe E Spiess; Gordon A Brown; Mark F Munsell; H Barton Grossman; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Colin P N Dinney; Ashish M Kamat Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Kang Su Cho; Ho Kyung Seo; Jae Young Joung; Weon Seo Park; Jae Y Ro; Kyung Seok Han; Jinsoo Chung; Kang Hyun Lee Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-10-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Thomas J Guzzo; Ahmed Magheli; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Matthew E Nielsen; Frank J Attenello; Mark P Schoenberg; Mark L Gonzalgo Journal: Urology Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: David C Smith; Niklas J Mackler; Rodney L Dunn; Maha Hussain; David Wood; Cheryl T Lee; Martin Sanda; Ulka Vaishampayan; Daniel P Petrylak; David I Quinn; Kathleen Beekman; James E Montie Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-10-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Hendrik Isbarn; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Umberto Capitanio; Ganesh S Palapattu; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Yair Lotan; Mark P Schoenberg; Gilad E Amiel; Seth P Lerner; Guru Sonpavde Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Matthew Zibelman; Aeen M Asghar; Daniel C Parker; John O'Neill; Shuanzeng Wei; Richard E Greenberg; Marc C Smaldone; David Y T Chen; Rosalia Viterbo; Robert G Uzzo; Evan Bloom; Rutika Kokate; Daniel M Geynisman; Pooja Ghatalia; Mengying Deng; Eric A Ross; Elizabeth Plimack; Philip H Abbosh; Alexander Kutikov Journal: J Urol Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 7.450