Literature DB >> 22447326

Influence of intergeneric/interspecies mitochondrial injection; parthenogenetic development of bovine oocytes after injection of mitochondria derived from somatic cells.

Kumiko Takeda1, Kanokwan Srirattana, Kazutsugu Matsukawa, Satoshi Akagi, Masahiro Kaneda, Mariko Tasai, Keijiro Nirasawa, Carl A Pinkert, Rangsun Parnpai, Takashi Nagai.   

Abstract

Interspecies/intergeneric mitochondrial heteroplasmy can occur in interspecies/intergeneric hybrid embryos or following nuclear transfer. In the present study, intergeneric buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) mitochondria (WB-mt) or interspecies murine (Mus spretus) mitochondria (M-mt) were injected into bovine (Bos taurus) oocytes, and the subsequent embryonic development was characterized. Fibroblast mitochondria (WB-mt or M-mt) were microinjected into in vitro matured bovine oocytes followed by oocyte activation by a combination of electrical stimulation and 6-dimethylaminopurine treatment. After seven days of culture, embryo development was evaluated. The copy number of specific mtDNA populations (introduced and native mtDNA) from heteroplasmic oocytes was estimated using real-time PCR. The results illustrated that oocytes injected with either WB-mt or M-mt can develop to the blastocyst stage (20.6% and 19.6%). Cleavage division rates and development to the morula stage in oocytes injected with WB-mt were lower (76.2% and 45.9%, respectively) in comparison with uninjected oocytes (89.2% and 59.1%, respectively) (P<0.05). However, no differences were found in comparing M-mt injected oocytes and controls (P>0.05). An increase in bovine mtDNA copy number was observed at the expanded blastocyst stage of injected embryos (P<0.01), while the number of injected mtDNA was stable throughout development. This study demonstrates that interspecies/intergeneric mitochondrial injected bovine oocytes have the ability to develop to the blastocyst stage after parthenogenetic activation and that injected mtDNA was neither selectively destroyed nor enhanced through development. Moreover, injected intergeneric mitochondria had a demonstrated influence on bovine parthenogenetic development and mtDNA replication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22447326     DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2011-013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Dev        ISSN: 0916-8818            Impact factor:   2.214


  8 in total

1.  Transgenic chicken, mice, cattle, and pig embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer into pig oocytes.

Authors:  Mukesh Kumar Gupta; Ziban Chandra Das; Young Tae Heo; Jin Young Joo; Hak-Jae Chung; Hyuk Song; Jae-Hwan Kim; Nam-Hyung Kim; Hoon Taek Lee; Dae Hwan Ko; Sang Jun Uhm
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  MitoCeption: Transferring Isolated Human MSC Mitochondria to Glioblastoma Stem Cells.

Authors:  Brice Nzigou Mombo; Sabine Gerbal-Chaloin; Aleksandra Bokus; Martine Daujat-Chavanieu; Christian Jorgensen; Jean-Philippe Hugnot; Marie-Luce Vignais
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  Mitochondrial DNA transmission and confounding mitochondrial influences in cloned cattle and pigs.

Authors:  Kumiko Takeda
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-10

Review 4.  Cell Connections by Tunneling Nanotubes: Effects of Mitochondrial Trafficking on Target Cell Metabolism, Homeostasis, and Response to Therapy.

Authors:  Marie-Luce Vignais; Andrés Caicedo; Jean-Marc Brondello; Christian Jorgensen
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-06-04       Impact factor: 5.443

5.  Manipulating the Mitochondrial Genome To Enhance Cattle Embryo Development.

Authors:  Kanokwan Srirattana; Justin C St John
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Behavior of DNA-lacking mitochondria in Entamoeba histolytica revealed by organelle transplant.

Authors:  Makoto Kazama; Sanae Ogiwara; Takashi Makiuchi; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Kumiko Nakada-Tsukui; Tomoyoshi Nozaki; Hiroshi Tachibana
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Functional consequences of mitochondrial mismatch in reconstituted embryos and offspring.

Authors:  Kumiko Takeda
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  MitoCeption as a new tool to assess the effects of mesenchymal stem/stromal cell mitochondria on cancer cell metabolism and function.

Authors:  Andrés Caicedo; Vanessa Fritz; Jean-Marc Brondello; Mickaël Ayala; Indira Dennemont; Naoill Abdellaoui; Florence de Fraipont; Anaïck Moisan; Claire Angebault Prouteau; Hassan Boukhaddaoui; Christian Jorgensen; Marie-Luce Vignais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.