Literature DB >> 22446982

Objective assessment of the immediate postoperative analgesia using pupillary reflex measurement: a prospective and observational study.

Mourad Aissou1, Aurelie Snauwaert, Claire Dupuis, Arthur Atchabahian, Frederic Aubrun, Marc Beaussier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of pain intensity during the immediate postoperative period is a key factor for pain management. However, this evaluation may be difficult in some circumstances. The pupillary dilatation reflex (PDR) has been successfully used to assess the analgesic component of a balanced anesthetic regimen. We hypothesized that PDR could be a reliable index of pain intensity and could guide morphine administration in the immediate postoperative period.
METHODS: One hundred patients scheduled to undergo general surgery were included in this prospective observational study. Pain intensity was assessed by using a simple five-item verbal rating scale (VRS). After patients awoke from general anesthesia, those experiencing mild or more severe pain (VRS more than 1) received intravenous morphine titration. Before and after intravenous morphine titration, the PDR induced by a standardized noxious stimulus was measured with a portable pupillometer. A receiver-operating curve was built to estimate the accuracy of PDR in objectively detecting patients requiring morphine titration. Results are given as median (95% CI).
RESULTS: On the initial evaluation, a correlation was found between VRS and PDR (ρ = 0.88 [0.83-0.92], P < 0.0001). In the 39 patients that had a VRS more than 1, PDR before and after morphine titration was respectively 35% (31-43) versus 12% (10-14); P < 0.0001. The PDR threshold value corresponding to the highest accuracy to have VRS more than 1 was 23%, with 91% and 94% sensitivity and specificity, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In the immediate postoperative period, the PDR is significantly correlated with the VRS. The pupillometer could be a valuable tool to guide morphine administration in the immediate postoperative period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22446982     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318251d1fb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  21 in total

Review 1.  [Monitoring of pain, nociception, and analgesia under general anesthesia: Relevance, current scientific status, and clinical practice].

Authors:  F von Dincklage
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Automated Pupillometry in Neurocritical Care: Research and Practice.

Authors:  Bethany L Lussier; DaiWai M Olson; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  In pursuit of pain: recent advances and future directions in pain assessment in the ICU.

Authors:  Céline Gélinas; Gerald Chanques; Kathleen Puntillo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of the effects of axomadol and its O-demethyl metabolite on pupil diameter and nociception in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Víctor Mangas-Sanjuan; José Martín Pastor; Jens Rengelshausen; Roberta Bursi; Iñaki F Troconiz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  The quantification and monitoring of intraoperative nociception levels in thoracic surgery: a review.

Authors:  Ismael Ghanty; Stefan Schraag
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Pupillometry: a non-invasive technique for pain assessment in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Mark A Connelly; Jacob T Brown; Gregory L Kearns; Rawni A Anderson; Shawn D St Peter; Kathleen A Neville
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Pupillary reflex dilation in response to incremental nociceptive stimuli in patients receiving intravenous ketamine.

Authors:  Nada Sabourdin; Thomas Giral; Risa Wolk; Nicolas Louvet; Isabelle Constant
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Assessment of pain during labor with pupillometry: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jean Guglielminotti; France Mentré; Johann Gaillard; Mohamed Ghalayini; Philippe Montravers; Dan Longrois
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Assessment of postoperative pain intensity by using photoplethysmography.

Authors:  Peng Ling; Yu Siyuan; Wei Wei; Gong Quan; Gao Bo
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 10.  Pupillometry in perioperative medicine: a narrative review.

Authors:  Senthil Packiasabapathy; Valluvan Rangasamy; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.713

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.