Literature DB >> 22446870

Diagnosis of TB from smear & culture negative sputum specimens by IS 6110 based PCR.

Philip Raj Abraham, V D Sharma, C T Shivannavar.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22446870      PMCID: PMC3336859     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Med Res        ISSN: 0971-5916            Impact factor:   2.375


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Early diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is one of the primary challenges in curtailing the spread of TB and is an important step for TB control programme worldwide1. Its diagnosis by smear microscopy remains the main stay in developing countries even though it suffers from low specificity and variable sensitivity2. Classically, there is a correlation between the presence of acid fast bacilli (AFB) in sputum specimens and the method of tuberculosis diagnosis. The sensitivity of both smear and culture positivity mainly depends on the number of viable or dormant mycobacteria in the sputum. The bacillary load in the collected sputum depends on the severity of the disease and the process of sputum collection which is influenced by the time of collection34. In this study we compared sputum specimens collected at different timings (i.e. spot and early morning) by smear, culture and IS 6110 based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Two consecutive sputum specimens (up to 5 ml each), one spot and the other early morning, were collected from 49 clinically suspected tuberculosis individuals attending designated microscopic centres (DMC) of Gulbarga district, south India during February 2005 to March 2006. Sputum smears were stained for AFB by Ziehl-Neelsen method at the DMC5. The remaining specimen was preserved in equal volumes in a solution of 1 per cent cetylpyridinium chloride and 2 per cent sodium chloride (CPC-NaCl) and transported to National JALMA Institute for Leprosy and Other Mycobacterial Diseases, Agra. These specimens were processed for culture on Lowenstein-Jensen's medium and mycobacterial growth was identified by standard biochemical tests67. The sputum specimens negative for smear and culture were subjected to PCR using IS 6110 specific primers8. Overall, 42.86 per cent (21/49) spot specimens were positive by smear compared to 65.32 per cent (32/49) being smear positive in the early morning specimens. The specimens positive for smear collected at spot were also positive for specimens collected early in the morning. Among the smear negative spot specimens, nearly 40 per cent (11/28) were found to be smear positive in the early morning specimens. The isolation rate of M. tuberculosis is exactly double (61.22%; 30/49) in specimens collected in the morning than at spot (30.61%; 15/49) and contamination rate remained same in both. Smear and culture positivity has almost 2.5 times higher when sputum specimens were collected in the morning (55.10%; 27/49) compared to only 22.45% (11/49) in spot specimens whereas, smear and culture negativity in both spot and early morning specimens was found to be 75 per cent and 76.4 per cent respectively. On further analysis of smear and culture negative specimens by IS 6110 based PCR, it yielded 85.72 per cent and 84.62 per cent positivity for spot and early morning specimens, respectively (Fig.).
Fig.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of IS 6110 based Polymerase chain reaction for detection of M. tuberculosis from sputum specimens. Lane 1= positive control from M. tuberculosis H37Rv; Lanes 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11= PCR positive; Lanes 3 and 6= PCR negative; Lane 12=negative control; M= molecular weight marker.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of IS 6110 based Polymerase chain reaction for detection of M. tuberculosis from sputum specimens. Lane 1= positive control from M. tuberculosis H37Rv; Lanes 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11= PCR positive; Lanes 3 and 6= PCR negative; Lane 12=negative control; M= molecular weight marker. Earlier guidelines of WHO and RNTCP suggested to test three sputum specimens, with one of these collected in the early morning. Recently, it is reduced to two specimens, one of which should be the morning specimen910. The only source of specimen for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis is sputum. The number of AFB present in the collected sputum and the method applied decide the detection rate. Clinically, there is a correlation between the presence of AFB in clinical specimens and the isolation of M. tuberculosis by culture. The cultures of M. tuberculosis are ultimately required to understand the aetiological agent and its resistance to various drugs and also important for diagnosis of smear negative TB. The volume, quality and also the time of collection of sputum specimens are important for the increase in the TB case detection rate from suspected TB cases by both smear and culture methods especially in TB prevalent countries341011. In the present study, on comparing spot and early morning sputum specimen by smear and culture methods, the results showed variations in the detection of tuberculosis from the sputum specimens collected at spot and at early morning from the same patient. Efforts made to isolate M. tuberculosis from sputum specimens preserved in CPC-NaCl reported an isolation rate ranging from 6.17 per cent to 78.3 per cent and higher isolation rates (70.22% to as high as 98%) in the smear positive specimens12–16. Our results are also in accordance with earlier reports. Hence, this study re-emphasizes the use of early morning sputum specimens to increase the possibilities of tuberculosis diagnosis by smear and culture methods. However, PCR showed almost similar positivity for spot and early morning specimens. Overall, the detection of TB by PCR was considerably higher than that of smear and culture methods. The higher rate of diagnosis is attributed to its sensitivity as evidenced by the reported studies17–19. PCR analysis also indicated that the time of specimens’ collection does not appreciably influence results for spot and early morning specimens; and it can be applied to any of the sputum specimens irrespective of their time of collection.
  14 in total

1.  Comparison of sodium carbonate, cetyl-pyridinium chloride, and sodium borate for preservation of sputa for culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  M Bobadilla-del-Valle; A Ponce-de-León; M Kato-Maeda; A Hernández-Cruz; J J Calva-Mercado; B Chávez-Mazari; B A Caballero-Rivera; J C Nolasco-García; J Sifuentes-Osornio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A minimum 5.0 ml of sputum improves the sensitivity of acid-fast smear for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  J R Warren; M Bhattacharya; K N De Almeida; K Trakas; L R Peterson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Utility of universal sample processing methodology, combining smear microscopy, culture, and PCR, for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Soumitesh Chakravorty; Mridu Dudeja; M Hanif; Jaya Sivaswami Tyagi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  From microscopy centre to culture laboratory: a viable ride for mycobacteria.

Authors:  S Aparna; Moorthy K V Krishna; S Gokhale
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Cetyl-pyridinium chloride is useful for isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputa subjected to long-term storage.

Authors:  Manuela Pardini; Francis Varaine; Elisabetta Iona; Erchanik Arzumanian; Francesco Checchi; Marco Rinaldo Oggioni; Graziella Orefici; Lanfranco Fattorini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Use of cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium chloride for the decontamination of sputum specimens that are transported to the laboratory for the isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  R W Smithwick; C B Stratigos; H L David
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  K D Eisenach; M D Sifford; M D Cave; J H Bates; J T Crawford
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1991-11

8.  Novel method for processing respiratory specimens for detection of mycobacteria by using C18-carboxypropylbetaine: blinded study.

Authors:  C G Thornton; K M MacLellan; T L Brink; D E Lockwood; M Romagnoli; J Turner; W G Merz; R S Schwalbe; M Moody; Y Lue; S Passen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Surveillance of drug resistance in tuberculosis in two districts of South India.

Authors:  C N Paramasivan; P Venkataraman; V Chandrasekaran; Shripad Bhat; P R Narayanan
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Insufficient quality of sputum submitted for tuberculosis diagnosis and associated factors, in Klaten district, Indonesia.

Authors:  Mateus Sakundarno; Nurjazuli Nurjazuli; Sutopo Patria Jati; Retna Sariningdyah; Sumarsono Purwadi; Bachti Alisjahbana; Marieke J van der Werf
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.317

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of a DNA Based PCR Approach with Conventional Methods for the Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Morocco.

Authors:  Fathiah Zakham; Oufae Lahlou; Mohammed Akrim; Nada Bouklata; Sanae Jaouhari; Khalid Sadki; Fouad Seghrouchni; Mohammed Elmzibri; Abdelaziz Benjouad; Mustapha Ennaji; Rajae Elaouad
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.576

2.  Educational intervention for collecting sputum for tuberculosis: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Amélia Nunes Sicsú; Julia Ignez Salem; Luciana Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto; Roxana Isabel Cardozo Gonzales; Maria do Socorro de Lucena Cardoso; Pedro Fredemir Palha
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-06-07

3.  Accuracy of a new rapid antigen detection test for pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Rasoul Aliannejad; Ahmadreza Bahrmand; Hamidreza Abtahi; Mahnaz Seifi; Enayat Safavi; Farid Abdolrahimi; Shahriyar Shahriaran
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2016-08

4.  A new diagnostic tool for rapid and accurate detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ali Nour-Neamatollahi; Seyed Davar Siadat; Shamsi Yari; Alireza Hadizadeh Tasbiti; Nayereh Ebrahimzadeh; Farzam Vaziri; Abolfazl Fateh; Morteza Ghazanfari; Farid Abdolrahimi; Shahin Pourazar; Ahmadreza Bahrmand
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 5.  Diagnosis of active tuberculosis disease: From microscopy to molecular techniques.

Authors:  Adam J Caulfield; Nancy L Wengenack
Journal:  J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis       Date:  2016-05-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.