Literature DB >> 22446675

Comparison of muscle activation levels during arm abduction in the plane of the scapula vs. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation upper extremity patterns.

James W Youdas1, David B Arend, Jada M Exstrom, Taylor J Helmus, Jessica D Rozeboom, John H Hollman.   

Abstract

This study quantified activation of 8 muscles of the shoulder, trunk, and back during standing performance of (a) arm abduction in the plane of the scapula (scaption), (b) proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) diagonal 1 flexion (D1F), and (c) PNF diagonal 2 flexion (D2F) while lifting a dumbbell with the dominant hand. Twelve men (26.1 ± 4.4 years) and 13 women (24.5 ± 1.9 years) volunteered to participate. Electromyographic signals were collected with DE-3.1 double-differential surface electrodes at a sampling frequency of 1,000 Hz. Electromyographic signals were normalized to peak activity in the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) trial and expressed as a percentage. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni corrections (α = 0.05) examined muscle activation patterns across the 3 conditions. For the middle trapezius, average activation was greater (p < 0.001) for D2F (70.5 ± 23.4% MVIC) than D1F (46.4 ± 19.6% MVIC). Lower trapezius average activation was greater (p < 0.001) for D2F (55.3 ± 23.8% MVIC) than D1F (40.1 ± 16% MVIC). The anterior deltoid showed greater activation (p = 0.009) for scaption (92.4 ± 26% MVIC) than D1F (74.4 ± 21.4% MVIC). The erector spinae showed greater activation for D2F (34.2 ± 12% MVIC; p < 0.001) and D1F (41.7 ± 21.4% MVIC; p < 0.001) than scaption (14.5 ± 12.3% MVIC). During D2F and scaption, all 6 muscles of the shoulder complex demonstrated very high activation levels (>60% MVIC) with the exception of the lower trapezius (55% MVIC). In contrast, erector spinae and external oblique muscles exhibited moderate activation (21-40% MVIC) during arm elevation. The 6 muscles of the shoulder complex displayed high to very high muscle activation at a level appropriate for strength training during all 3 exercise conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22446675     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822e597f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Post-stroke BDNF concentration changes following proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) exercises.

Authors:  Poonam Chaturvedi; Ajai Kumar Singh; Vandana Tiwari; Anup Kumar Thacker
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-07-30

2.  Trunk Range of Motion Is Related to Axial Rigidity, Functional Mobility and Quality of Life in Parkinson's Disease: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda; Lydia Vela-Desojo; Marcos Moreno-Verdú; María Del Rosario Ferreira-Sánchez; Yolanda Macías-Macías; Juan Carlos Miangolarra-Page
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Evaluation of strength and irradiated movement pattern resulting from trunk motions of the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.

Authors:  Luciana Bahia Gontijo; Polianna Delfino Pereira; Camila Danielle Cunha Neves; Ana Paula Santos; Dionis de Castro Dutra Machado; Victor Hugo do Vale Bastos
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2012-10-04

4.  A comparative study on the recruitment of shoulder stabilizing muscles and types of exercises.

Authors:  João Carlos Comel; Rosane Maria Nery; Eduardo Lima Garcia; Claudete da Silva Bueno; Edinara de Oliveira Silveira; Mariéle Marchezan Zarantonello; Marco Antonio Stefani
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2018-04-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.