Literature DB >> 22446614

A phase 2 study of the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines with/without taxanes.

H Kohail1, S Shehata, O Mansour, Y Gouda, R Gaafar, T A Hamid, S El Nowieam, A Al Khodary, H El Zawahry, A A Wareth, I A Halim, F A Taleb, E Hamada, M Barsoum, M Abdullah, M Meshref.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many patients with relapsed metastatic breast cancer are pre-treated with taxanes and anthracyclines, which are usually given in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting or as first-line treatment for metastatic disease. The primary objective of this study was to determine the overall response rate for combination treatment with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had relapsed after receiving one adjuvant/neoadjuvant or first-line metastatic chemotherapy regimen containing an anthracycline with/without a taxane. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, time to progression, one-year survival probability, and toxicity. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study conducted at 17 investigative sites in Egypt. PATIENTS AND METHODS: treatment consisted of gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression or a maximum of 6 cycles.
RESULTS: Of 144 patients all were evaluable for safety and 132 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overall response rate was 33.3% and 45.5% of the patients with stable disease as their best response. The median time-to-progression was 5.1 months and the one-year survival probability was 73%. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were nausea/vomiting (20.1%), neutropenia (19.4%), anemia (13.9%), asthenia (11.1%), diarrhea (9.7%), stomatitis (7.6%), leucopenia (7.6%), and thrombocytopenia (6.2%). twelve (8.3%) patients had serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that gemcitabine and cisplatin were active and generally well tolerated in pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22446614     DOI: 10.5144/1658-3876.2012.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Review on Breast Cancer Care in Africa.

Authors:  Eva J Kantelhardt; Gizaw Muluken; Getachew Sefonias; Ayele Wondimu; Hans Christoph Gebert; Susanne Unverzagt; Adamu Addissie
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  High-throughput screen identifies disulfiram as a potential therapeutic for triple-negative breast cancer cells: interaction with IQ motif-containing factors.

Authors:  Tyler J W Robinson; Melody Pai; Jeff C Liu; Frederick Vizeacoumar; Thomas Sun; Sean E Egan; Alessandro Datti; Jing Huang; Eldad Zacksenhaus
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Gemcitabine resistance in breast cancer cells regulated by PI3K/AKT-mediated cellular proliferation exerts negative feedback via the MEK/MAPK and mTOR pathways.

Authors:  Xiao Li Yang; Feng Juan Lin; Ya Jie Guo; Zhi Min Shao; Zhou Luo Ou
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Inactivation of chromatin remodeling factors sensitizes cells to selective cytotoxic stress.

Authors:  Miles D Freeman; Tryphon Mazu; Jana S Miles; Selina Darling-Reed; Hernan Flores-Rozas
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2014-11-14

5.  Maintenance chemotherapy after 6 cycles of platinum-doublet regimen in anthracycline-and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Eun Kyo Joung; Ji Hyun Yang; Sooeun Oh; Se Jun Park; Jieun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.884

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.