AIMS: To describe and compare the causative organisms, clinical features and visual outcomes of endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection (IVI) to endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. METHODS: Patient population and setting: A retrospective case series of patients with acute endophthalmitis following either cataract surgery or IVI presenting to a tertiary referral centre--Sydney Eye Hospital--between 2007 and 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) identification of the causative organism; (2) time to presentation; (3) odds of improvement in visual acuity (VA) following treatment; (4) odds of final VA of counting fingers (CF) or less and (5) odds of enucleation. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients in our study, 48 had preceding cataract surgery and 53 had preceding IVI. There was an increased incidence of Streptococcus spp. endophthalmitis in post-IVI cases (24.53% vs 6.25%; OR 5.85; p=0.022). Endophthalmitis following IVI had increased likelihood of a final VA of CF or less (OR=6.0; p<0.01), decreased likelihood of any improvement in acuity following treatment (OR=0.13; p<0.01) and an increased likelihood of presenting within a week of the procedure (OR=3.93; p<0.01). Endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus spp. was associated with increased likelihood of a final VA of CF or less (OR=10.2; p<0.01), decreased likelihood of any improvement in acuity following treatment (OR=0.06; p<0.01) and increased likelihood of enucleation (OR=17.11; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Endophthalmitis following IVI is associated with an increased incidence of Streptococcus spp. infection, earlier presentation and poorer visual outcomes when compared with endophthalmitis following cataract surgery.
AIMS: To describe and compare the causative organisms, clinical features and visual outcomes of endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection (IVI) to endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. METHODS:Patient population and setting: A retrospective case series of patients with acute endophthalmitis following either cataract surgery or IVI presenting to a tertiary referral centre--Sydney Eye Hospital--between 2007 and 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) identification of the causative organism; (2) time to presentation; (3) odds of improvement in visual acuity (VA) following treatment; (4) odds of final VA of counting fingers (CF) or less and (5) odds of enucleation. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients in our study, 48 had preceding cataract surgery and 53 had preceding IVI. There was an increased incidence of Streptococcus spp. endophthalmitis in post-IVI cases (24.53% vs 6.25%; OR 5.85; p=0.022). Endophthalmitis following IVI had increased likelihood of a final VA of CF or less (OR=6.0; p<0.01), decreased likelihood of any improvement in acuity following treatment (OR=0.13; p<0.01) and an increased likelihood of presenting within a week of the procedure (OR=3.93; p<0.01). Endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus spp. was associated with increased likelihood of a final VA of CF or less (OR=10.2; p<0.01), decreased likelihood of any improvement in acuity following treatment (OR=0.06; p<0.01) and increased likelihood of enucleation (OR=17.11; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Endophthalmitis following IVI is associated with an increased incidence of Streptococcus spp. infection, earlier presentation and poorer visual outcomes when compared with endophthalmitis following cataract surgery.
Authors: Emily W Gower; Lisa J Keay; Dianne E Stare; Pallavi Arora; Sandra D Cassard; Ashley Behrens; James M Tielsch; Oliver D Schein Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ajay E Kuriyan; Kathleen D Weiss; Harry W Flynn; William E Smiddy; Audina M Berrocal; Thomas A Albini; Darlene Miller Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Joseph M Simonett; Austin Igelman; Stanford C Taylor; J Peter Campbell; Thomas S Hwang; Phoebe Lin; Andreas K Lauer; Christina J Flaxel Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 1.300
Authors: Ajay E Kuriyan; Jayanth Sridhar; Harry W Flynn; William E Smiddy; Thomas A Albini; Audina M Berrocal; Richard K Forster; Peter J Belin; Darlene Miller Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 5.258