Literature DB >> 2244610

Impetigo. Current etiology and comparison of penicillin, erythromycin, and cephalexin therapies.

C W Demidovich1, R R Wittler, M E Ruff, J W Bass, W C Browning.   

Abstract

We attempted to determine the causative bacterial pathogens of impetigo in children in our area, to compare the effectiveness of three frequently used oral antimicrobial treatment regimens, and to correlate the antimicrobial sensitivity of the bacterial isolates with clinical responses to treatment. Seventy-three children with impetigo were randomly assigned to receive penicillin V potassium or cephalexin monohydrate, both administered in dosages of 40 to 50 mg/kg per day, or erythromycin estolate administered in a dosage of 30 to 40 mg/kg per day. All drugs were given in three divided doses for 10 days. Treatment failure was defined as persistence of lesions 8 to 10 days after initiation of drug therapy as determined by examiners blinded to the treatment therapies. Forty-five (62%) cultures showed Staphylococcus aureus only, 14 (19%) showed S aureus and group A beta-hemolytic streptococci, six (8%) showed group A beta-hemolytic streptococci only, and eight (11%) showed no growth or other organisms. Treatment failure occurred in six (24%) of 25 patients treated with penicillin V, one (4%) of 25 patients treated with erythromycin estolate, and no patients treated with cephalexin. We conclude that S aureus is the most common cause of impetigo in children in our study population, that cephalexin is the most effective treatment, that erythromycin estolate is nearly equally effective and may be preferred on a cost-effectiveness basis, and that penicillin V is inadequate for treatment of this infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2244610     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150360037015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dis Child        ISSN: 0002-922X


  8 in total

1.  Efficacy of a new cream formulation of mupirocin: comparison with oral and topical agents in experimental skin infections.

Authors:  J Gisby; J Bryant
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  USE OF AMOXICILLIN AND CLAVULANIC ACID (AUGMENTIN) IN THE TREATMENT OF SKIN AND SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN.

Authors:  Ts Raghu Raman
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

Review 3.  Staphylococcal skin infections in children: rational drug therapy recommendations.

Authors:  Shamez Ladhani; Mehdi Garbash
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 4.  Interventions for impetigo.

Authors:  Sander Koning; Renske van der Sande; Arianne P Verhagen; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit; Andrew D Morris; Christopher C Butler; Marjolein Berger; Johannes C van der Wouden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

5.  Double-blind study comparing erythromycin and mupirocin for treatment of impetigo in children: implications of a high prevalence of erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  R Dagan; Y Bar-David
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  A practical guide to the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Horatio B Fung; Joanne Y Chang; Stephen Kuczynski
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for impetigo.

Authors:  Ajay George; Greg Rubin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  A retrospective study of some clinical and epidemiological features of impetigo patients seen in dermatology clinic in the eastern province of saudi arabia.

Authors:  Khalid M Al-Ghamdi
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2006-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.