Literature DB >> 22446020

Concordance in KRAS and BRAF mutations in endoscopic biopsy samples and resection specimens of colorectal adenocarcinoma.

L C Krol1, N A 't Hart, N Methorst, A J Knol, C Prinsen, J E Boers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: KRAS testing is mandatory if anti-EGFR therapy is considered in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In addition, BRAF mutations seem to be an important negative prognostic factor. The aim of this study is to establish the concordance of KRAS and BRAF mutational status in paired biopsy and resection specimens of primary CRC using several analytic methods.
METHODS: DNA was extracted from paraffin blocks of 126 CRC patients. KRAS codon 12/13 and BRAF V600E mutational status was assessed using high resolution melting (HRM), direct sequencing (DS) of the HRM polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product. In addition, the Therascreen Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS)-Scorpion KRAS assay and BRAF pyrosequencing were employed; both assays claim to require less tumour cells in comparison with DS.
RESULTS: KRAS and BRAF were found to be mutually exclusive. Mutation frequencies were 33.9% for KRAS, and for BRAF 19.0%, respectively. Concordance of KRAS mutational status between biopsy and resection specimens was 97.4% (ARMS), 98.4% (DS) and 99.2% (HRM), respectively. For BRAF concordance was 98.4% (Pyro, DS) and 99.2% (HRM).
CONCLUSIONS: KRAS and BRAF mutational status of endoscopic biopsies and resection specimens of CRC showed a >95% concordance. Endoscopic biopsies can be confidently used for molecular analysis.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22446020     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  14 in total

1.  BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry is reliable in primary and metastatic colorectal carcinoma regardless of treatment status and shows high intratumoral homogeneity.

Authors:  Jacob R Bledsoe; Michal Kamionek; Mari Mino-Kenudson
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Longitudinal molecular characterization of endoscopic specimens from colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Petra Minarikova; Lucie Benesova; Tereza Halkova; Barbora Belsanova; Stepan Suchanek; Jiri Cyrany; Inna Tuckova; Jan Bures; Miroslav Zavoral; Marek Minarik
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Validates the Use of Diagnostic Biopsies as a Suitable Alternative to Resection Material for Mutation Screening in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hersh A Ham-Karim; Henry Okuchukwu Ebili; Kirsty Manger; Wakkas Fadhil; Narmeen S Ahmad; Susan D Richman; Mohammad Ilyas
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Sanger sequencing in routine KRAS testing: a review of 1720 cases from a pathologist's perspective.

Authors:  Umberto Malapelle; Claudio Bellevicine; Maria Salatiello; Caterina de Luca; Elisabetta Rispo; Palmira Riccio; Lucianna Sparano; Alfonso De Stefano; Chiara Carlomagno; Francesco Maria Maiello; Giulia Vita; Oscar Nappi; Giancarlo Troncone
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  RAS mutations vary between lesions in synchronous primary colorectal cancer: testing only one lesion is not sufficient to guide anti-EGFR treatment decisions.

Authors:  Mariana Petaccia de Macedo; Fernanda Machado de Melo; Júlia da Silva Ribeiro; Celso Abdon Lopes de Mello; Maria Dirlei Ferreira de Souza Begnami; Fernando Augusto Soares; Dirce Maria Carraro; Isabela Werneck da Cunha
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2015-02-09

6.  High-resolution melting analysis for accurate detection of BRAF mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dong Chen; Yan-Yan Wang; Zheng-Ran Chuai; Jun-Fu Huang; Yun-Xia Wang; Kai Liu; Li-Qun Zhang; Zhao Yang; Da-Chuan Shi; Qian Liu; Qing Huang; Wei-Ling Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  BRAFV600E mutation and its association with clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dong Chen; Jun-Fu Huang; Kai Liu; Li-Qun Zhang; Zhao Yang; Zheng-Ran Chuai; Yun-Xia Wang; Da-Chuan Shi; Qing Huang; Wei-Ling Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  KRAS mutation analysis by PCR: a comparison of two methods.

Authors:  Louise Bolton; Anne Reiman; Katie Lucas; Judith Timms; Ian A Cree
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The prognostic role of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  V Eklöf; M L Wikberg; S Edin; A M Dahlin; B-A Jonsson; Å Öberg; J Rutegård; R Palmqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in colorectal adenocarcinoma specimens with a low percentage of tumor cells.

Authors:  Marzena Anna Lewandowska; Wojciech Jóźwicki; Bogdan Żurawski
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.