OBJECTIVES: This study examines the effects of IV epinephrine administration on carotid blood flow (CBF) and end tidal CO(2) (ETCO(2)) production in a swine model of active compression-decompression CPR with an impedance threshold device (ACD-CPR+ITD). METHODS: Six female swine (32 ± 1 kg) were anesthetized, intubated and ventilated. Intracranial, thoracic aorta and right atrial pressures were measured via indwelling catheters. CBF was recorded. ETCO(2), SpO(2) and EKG were monitored. V-fib was induced and went untreated for 6 min. Three minutes each of standard CPR (STD), STD-CPR+impedance threshold device (ITD) and active compression-decompression (ACD)-CPR+ITD were performed. At minute 9 of the resuscitation, 40 μg/kg of IV Epinephrine was administered and ACD-CPR+ITD was continued for 1 min. Statistical analysis was performed with a paired t-test. p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant and all values are reported in mmHg unless otherwise noted. RESULTS: Aortic pressure, cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures increased from STD<STD+ITD<ACD-CPR+ITD (p<0.001). Epinephrine administered during ACD-CPR+ITD signficantly increased mean aortic pressure (29 ± 5 vs 42 ± 12, p = 0.01), cerebral perfusion pressure (12 ± 5 vs 22 ± 10, p = 0.01), and coronary perfusion pressure (8 ± 7 vs 17 ± 4, p = 0.02); however, mean CBF and ETCO(2) decreased (respectively 29 ± 15 vs 14 ± 7.0 ml/min, p = 0.03; 20 ± 7 vs 18 ± 6, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this model, administration of epinephrine during ACD-CPR+ITD significantly increased markers of macrocirculation, while significantly decreasing carotid blood flow and ETCO(2). This calls into question the ability of calculated perfusion pressures to accurately reflect oxygen delivery to end organs. The administration of epinephrine during ACD-CPR+ITD does not improve cerebral tissue perfusion.
OBJECTIVES: This study examines the effects of IV epinephrine administration on carotid blood flow (CBF) and end tidal CO(2) (ETCO(2)) production in a swine model of active compression-decompression CPR with an impedance threshold device (ACD-CPR+ITD). METHODS: Six female swine (32 ± 1 kg) were anesthetized, intubated and ventilated. Intracranial, thoracic aorta and right atrial pressures were measured via indwelling catheters. CBF was recorded. ETCO(2), SpO(2) and EKG were monitored. V-fib was induced and went untreated for 6 min. Three minutes each of standard CPR (STD), STD-CPR+impedance threshold device (ITD) and active compression-decompression (ACD)-CPR+ITD were performed. At minute 9 of the resuscitation, 40 μg/kg of IV Epinephrine was administered and ACD-CPR+ITD was continued for 1 min. Statistical analysis was performed with a paired t-test. p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant and all values are reported in mmHg unless otherwise noted. RESULTS: Aortic pressure, cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures increased from STD<STD+ITD<ACD-CPR+ITD (p<0.001). Epinephrine administered during ACD-CPR+ITD signficantly increased mean aortic pressure (29 ± 5 vs 42 ± 12, p = 0.01), cerebral perfusion pressure (12 ± 5 vs 22 ± 10, p = 0.01), and coronary perfusion pressure (8 ± 7 vs 17 ± 4, p = 0.02); however, mean CBF and ETCO(2) decreased (respectively 29 ± 15 vs 14 ± 7.0 ml/min, p = 0.03; 20 ± 7 vs 18 ± 6, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this model, administration of epinephrine during ACD-CPR+ITD significantly increased markers of macrocirculation, while significantly decreasing carotid blood flow and ETCO(2). This calls into question the ability of calculated perfusion pressures to accurately reflect oxygen delivery to end organs. The administration of epinephrine during ACD-CPR+ITD does not improve cerebral tissue perfusion.
Authors: Gavin D Perkins; Tom Quinn; Charles D Deakin; Jerry P Nolan; Ranjit Lall; Anne-Marie Slowther; Matthew Cooke; Sarah E Lamb; Stavros Petrou; Felix Achana; Judith Finn; Ian G Jacobs; Andrew Carson; Mike Smyth; Kyee Han; Sonia Byers; Nigel Rees; Richard Whitfield; Fionna Moore; Rachael Fothergill; Nigel Stallard; John Long; Susie Hennings; Jessica Horton; Charlotte Kaye; Simon Gates Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2016-09-17 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Nicolas Segal; Anja K Metzger; Johanna C Moore; Laura India; Michael C Lick; Paul S Berger; Wanchun Tang; David G Benditt; Keith G Lurie Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2017-09
Authors: Constantine D Mavroudis; Tiffany S Ko; Ryan W Morgan; Lindsay E Volk; William P Landis; Benjamin Smood; Rui Xiao; Marco Hefti; Timothy W Boorady; Alexandra Marquez; Michael Karlsson; Daniel J Licht; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Todd J Kilbaugh Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 9.097