Literature DB >> 22445125

Effects of housing conditions during the rearing and laying period on adrenal reactivity, immune response and heterophil to lymphocyte (H/L) ratios in laying hens.

R O Moe1, D Guémené, M Bakken, H J S Larsen, S Shini, S Lervik, E Skjerve, V Michel, R Tauson.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of early rearing conditions on physiological, haematological and immunological responses relevant to adaptation and long-term stress in white Leghorn hens with intact beaks housed in furnished cages (FC) or conventional cages (CC) during the laying period. Pullets were cage reared (CR) or litter floor reared (FR). From 16 to 76 weeks of age, hens were housed in FC (eight hens per cage) or in CC (three hens per cage). As measures of long-term stress at the end of the laying period, adrenal reactivity was quantified by assessing corticosterone responses to adrenocorticotropin challenge, and immune response was assessed by measuring antibody responses after immunization with sheep red blood cells (SRBC) and keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH). Heterophil to lymphocyte (H/L) ratio was employed as an indicator of stress. Rearing conditions significantly affected anti-SRBC titres (P < 0.0001) and tended to affect H/L ratios (P = 0.07), with the highest values found in FR hens. Layer housing affected H/L ratio (P < 0.01); the highest ratio was found in FR birds housed in FC during the laying period. This study shows that early rearing environment affects immunological indicators that are widely used to assess stress in laying hens. However, while results on H/L ratio indicated that FR birds experienced more stress particularly when they were housed in FC during the laying period, the immune responses to SRBC in FR hens was improved, indicating the opposite. This contradiction suggests that the effects on immune response may have been associated with pathogenic load due to environmental complexity in FR and FC hens rather than stress due to rearing system or housing system per se.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22445125     DOI: 10.1017/S175173111000100X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

Review 1.  Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens.

Authors:  Andrew M Janczak; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Phytogenic compounds do not interfere physiological parameters and growth performances on two Indonesian local breeds of ducks.

Authors:  Ismoyowati Ismoyowati; Diana Indrasanti; Sigit Mugiyono; Mulyoto Pangestu
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-11-04

3.  Comparison and Correlation Analysis of Immune Function and Gut Microbiota of Broiler Chickens Raised in Double-Layer Cages and Litter Floor Pens.

Authors:  Bochen Song; Shaojia Yan; Peng Li; Guang Li; Mingkun Gao; Lei Yan; Zengpeng Lv; Yuming Guo
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-06-29

4.  The active core microbiota of two high-yielding laying hen breeds fed with different levels of calcium and phosphorus.

Authors:  Christoph Roth; Tanja Sims; Markus Rodehutscord; Jana Seifert; Amélia Camarinha-Silva
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Rearing Laying Hens in Aviaries Reduces Fearfulness following Transfer to Furnished Cages.

Authors:  Margrethe Brantsæter; Fernanda M Tahamtani; Randi O Moe; Tone B Hansen; Rachel Orritt; Christine Nicol; Andrew M Janczak
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-02-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.