Literature DB >> 22444945

A cluster randomised stepped wedge trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted information technology-based intervention in reducing high-risk prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antiplatelets in primary medical care: the DQIP study protocol.

Tobias Dreischulte1, Aileen Grant, Peter Donnan, Colin McCowan, Peter Davey, Dennis Petrie, Shaun Treweek, Bruce Guthrie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-risk prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antiplatelet agents accounts for a significant proportion of hospital admissions due to preventable adverse drug events. The recently completed PINCER trial has demonstrated that a one-off pharmacist-led information technology (IT)-based intervention can significantly reduce high-risk prescribing in primary care, but there is evidence that effects decrease over time and employing additional pharmacists to facilitate change may not be sustainable. METHODS/
DESIGN: We will conduct a cluster randomised controlled with a stepped wedge design in 40 volunteer general practices in two Scottish health boards. Eligible practices are those that are using the INPS Vision clinical IT system, and have agreed to have relevant medication-related data to be automatically extracted from their electronic medical records. All practices (clusters) that agree to take part will receive the data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) intervention, but will be randomised to one of 10 start dates. The DQIP intervention has three components: a web-based informatics tool that provides weekly updated feedback of targeted prescribing at practice level, prompts the review of individual patients affected, and summarises each patient's relevant risk factors and prescribing; an outreach visit providing education on targeted prescribing and training in the use of the informatics tool; and a fixed payment of 350 GBP (560 USD; 403 EUR) up front and a small payment of 15 GBP (24 USD; 17 EUR) for each patient reviewed in the 12 months of the intervention. We hypothesise that the DQIP intervention will reduce a composite of nine previously validated measures of high-risk prescribing. Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to blind practices, the core research team, or the data analyst. However, outcome assessment is entirely objective and automated. There will additionally be a process and economic evaluation alongside the main trial. DISCUSSION: The DQIP intervention is an example of a potentially sustainable safety improvement intervention that builds on the existing National Health Service IT-infrastructure to facilitate systematic management of high-risk prescribing by existing practice staff. Although the focus in this trial is on Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antiplatelets, we anticipate that the tested intervention would be generalisable to other types of prescribing if shown to be effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, dossier number: NCT01425502.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22444945      PMCID: PMC3353207          DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implement Sci        ISSN: 1748-5908            Impact factor:   7.327


  24 in total

Review 1.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  M A Thomson O'Brien; N Freemantle; A D Oxman; F Wolf; D A Davis; J Herrin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

2.  Whither British general practice after the 2004 GMS contract? Stories and realities of change in four UK general practices.

Authors:  Guro Huby; Bruce Guthrie; Suzanne Grant; Francis Watkins; Kath Checkland; Ruth McDonald; Huw Davies
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2008

3.  Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract.

Authors:  Kath Checkland; Stephen Harrison; Ruth McDonald; Suzanne Grant; Stephen Campbell; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2008-04-28

4.  High risk prescribing in primary care patients particularly vulnerable to adverse drug events: cross sectional population database analysis in Scottish general practice.

Authors:  Bruce Guthrie; Colin McCowan; Peter Davey; Colin R Simpson; Tobias Dreischulte; Karen Barnett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-06-21

5.  Causes of preventable drug-related hospital admissions: a qualitative study.

Authors:  R Howard; A Avery; P Bissell
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2008-04

Review 6.  Does pharmacist-led medication review help to reduce hospital admissions and deaths in older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Holland; James Desborough; Larry Goodyer; Sandra Hall; David Wright; Yoon K Loke
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  M A O'Brien; S Rogers; G Jamtvedt; A D Oxman; J Odgaard-Jensen; D T Kristoffersen; L Forsetlund; D Bainbridge; N Freemantle; D A Davis; R B Haynes; E L Harvey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

8.  The impact of pay-for-performance on professional boundaries in UK general practice: an ethnographic study.

Authors:  Suzanne Grant; Guro Huby; Francis Watkins; Kath Checkland; Ruth McDonald; Huw Davies; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2008-10-02

9.  Expert consensus on the desirable characteristics of review criteria for improvement of health care quality.

Authors:  H M Hearnshaw; R M Harker; F M Cheater; R H Baker; G M Grimshaw
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

10.  Protocol for the PINCER trial: a cluster randomised trial comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practices.

Authors:  Anthony J Avery; Sarah Rodgers; Judith A Cantrill; Sarah Armstrong; Rachel Elliott; Rachel Howard; Denise Kendrick; Caroline J Morris; Scott A Murray; Robin J Prescott; Kathrin Cresswell; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  26 in total

1.  Health Economic Evaluation Alongside Stepped Wedge Trials: A Methodological Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Lung; Lei Si; Richard Hooper; Gian Luca Di Tanna
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Considerations Before Selecting a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Design for a Practice Improvement Study.

Authors:  Ann M Nguyen; Charles M Cleland; L Miriam Dickinson; Michael P Barry; Samuel Cykert; F Daniel Duffy; Anton J Kuzel; Stephan R Lindner; Michael L Parchman; Donna R Shelley; Theresa L Walunas
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.707

3.  Evaluating the safety of mental health-related prescribing in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

Authors:  Wael Y Khawagi; Douglas Steinke; Matthew J Carr; Alison K Wright; Darren M Ashcroft; Anthony Avery; Richard Neil Keers
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 7.418

4.  An ethnographic exploration of influences on prescribing in general practice: why is there variation in prescribing practices?

Authors:  Aileen Grant; Frank Sullivan; Jon Dowell
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  Logistic, ethical, and political dimensions of stepped wedge trials: critical review and case studies.

Authors:  Audrey Prost; Ariella Binik; Ibrahim Abubakar; Anjana Roy; Manuela De Allegri; Christelle Mouchoux; Tobias Dreischulte; Helen Ayles; James J Lewis; David Osrin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2014.

Authors:  Emma Beard; James J Lewis; Andrew Copas; Calum Davey; David Osrin; Gianluca Baio; Jennifer A Thompson; Katherine L Fielding; Rumana Z Omar; Sam Ononge; James Hargreaves; Audrey Prost
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches.

Authors:  Andrew J Copas; James J Lewis; Jennifer A Thompson; Calum Davey; Gianluca Baio; James R Hargreaves
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Study protocol of a mixed-methods evaluation of a cluster randomized trial to improve the safety of NSAID and antiplatelet prescribing: data-driven quality improvement in primary care.

Authors:  Aileen Grant; Tobias Dreischulte; Shaun Treweek; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting.

Authors:  Aileen Grant; Shaun Treweek; Tobias Dreischulte; Robbie Foy; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Developing 'high impact' guideline-based quality indicators for UK primary care: a multi-stage consensus process.

Authors:  Bruno Rushforth; Tim Stokes; Elizabeth Andrews; Thomas A Willis; Rosemary McEachan; Simon Faulkner; Robbie Foy
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.