Clara Tan-Tam1, Eukua Yorke1, Michael Wasdell2, Camelia Barcan2, David Konkin2, Peter Blair3. 1. General Surgery, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada. 2. Fraser Health Authority, 4269 Fitzsimmons Rd S, 13 Whistler, BC V0N 1B7 British Columbia, Canada. 3. Fraser Health Authority, 4269 Fitzsimmons Rd S, 13 Whistler, BC V0N 1B7 British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: Peter.blair@fraserhealth.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) with open appendectomy (OA) show a reduction in wound infections associated with LA but a 3-fold increase in intra-abdominal abscess with LA. Surgical time and operation costs are higher with LA. The advantage of LA over OA is small. Although these patients have not been specifically analyzed in the report, the systematic review recommends the routine use of LA in young women and obese people. The purpose of this study is to determine if obese patients benefit in a shorter length of stay (LOS) by having LA versus OA surgery compared with their nonobese counterparts. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 315 adult patients who have undergone appendectomies at Royal Columbian and Burnaby Hospitals between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2011. Appendectomies performed in pregnant women combined with other surgeries and those converted to OA were excluded. Outcomes and the postoperative stay for obese and nonobese patients were assessed. RESULTS: The LOS is shorter with LAs than with OAs (2.06 vs 4.13 days, P < .05). The LOS, in obese patients, is much shorter with LAs than with OAs (1.69 vs 6.82 days, P < .05). The variability in LOS is much higher in obese patients as compared with nonobese patients (standard deviation = 8.57 vs 2.67). The body mass index and the type of surgery contribute to a significant difference in LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients who undergo LA have a decreased LOS as compared with obese patients who undergo OA for appendicitis. This is the first study showing specifically that LA benefits obese patients and the health care system.
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) with open appendectomy (OA) show a reduction in wound infections associated with LA but a 3-fold increase in intra-abdominal abscess with LA. Surgical time and operation costs are higher with LA. The advantage of LA over OA is small. Although these patients have not been specifically analyzed in the report, the systematic review recommends the routine use of LA in young women and obesepeople. The purpose of this study is to determine if obesepatients benefit in a shorter length of stay (LOS) by having LA versus OA surgery compared with their nonobese counterparts. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 315 adult patients who have undergone appendectomies at Royal Columbian and Burnaby Hospitals between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2011. Appendectomies performed in pregnant women combined with other surgeries and those converted to OA were excluded. Outcomes and the postoperative stay for obese and nonobese patients were assessed. RESULTS: The LOS is shorter with LAs than with OAs (2.06 vs 4.13 days, P < .05). The LOS, in obesepatients, is much shorter with LAs than with OAs (1.69 vs 6.82 days, P < .05). The variability in LOS is much higher in obesepatients as compared with nonobese patients (standard deviation = 8.57 vs 2.67). The body mass index and the type of surgery contribute to a significant difference in LOS. CONCLUSIONS:Obesepatients who undergo LA have a decreased LOS as compared with obesepatients who undergo OA for appendicitis. This is the first study showing specifically that LA benefits obesepatients and the health care system.