Literature DB >> 22444609

Carbohydrate quantitative digestion and absorption in ruminants: from feed starch and fibre to nutrients available for tissues.

P Nozière1, I Ortigues-Marty, C Loncke, D Sauvant.   

Abstract

Carbohydrates are the main source of energy in ruminants. Their site, extent and kinetics of digestion highly impact the amount and profile of nutrients delivered to peripheral tissues, and the responses of the animal, i.e. ingestion, efficiency of production, N and methane excretion, quality of products and welfare. Development of multi-objective feed evaluation systems thus requires a more integrated quantitative knowledge on carbohydrate digestion and yield of terminal products, as well as on their metabolism by splanchnic tissues. The objective of this paper is to review (i) quantitative knowledge on fibre, starch and sugar digestion, volatile fatty acids (VFA) and glucose production and splanchnic metabolism and (ii) modelling approaches which aim at representing and/or predicting nutrient fluxes in the digestive tract, portal and hepatic drainage. It shows that the representation of carbohydrate digestion and VFA yield is relatively homogeneous among models. Although published quantitative comparisons of these models are scarce, they stress that prediction of fibre digestion and VFA yield and composition is still not good enough for use in feed formulation, whereas prediction of microbial N yield and ruminal starch digestion seems to be more satisfactory. Uncertainties on VFA stoichiometric coefficients and absorption rates may partly explain the poor predictions of VFA. Hardly any mechanistic models have been developed on portal-drained viscera (PDV) metabolism whereas a few exist for liver metabolism. A qualitative comparison of these models is presented. Most are focused on dairy cows and their level of aggregation in the representation of nutrient fluxes and metabolism highly differs depending on their objectives. Quantitative comparison of these models is still lacking. However, recent advances have been achieved with the empirical prediction of VFA and glucose production and fluxes through PDV and liver based on the current INRA feed evaluation system. These advances are presented. They illustrate that empirical prediction of ruminal VFA and intestinal glucose production can be evaluated by comparison with measured net portal net fluxes. We also illustrate the potential synergy between empirical and mechanistic modelling. It is concluded that concomitant empirical and mechanistic approach may likely help to progress towards development of multi-objective feed evaluation systems based on nutrient fluxes.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22444609     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731110000844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  10 in total

1.  Ripening influences banana and plantain peels composition and energy content.

Authors:  Thomas Happi Emaga; Jérôme Bindelle; Richard Agneesens; André Buldgen; Bernard Wathelet; Michel Paquot
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types-The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions.

Authors:  Xuezhao Sun; Long Cheng; Arjan Jonker; Sineka Munidasa; David Pacheco
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Predicting in vitro rumen VFA production using CNCPS carbohydrate fractions with multiple linear models and artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Ruilan Dong; Guangyong Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen parameters, growth rate, carcase characteristics and cannabinoid residues of sheep fed pelleted rations containing hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) stubble.

Authors:  Gaye L Krebs; Daniel W De Rosa; Dana M White; Bronwyn L Blake; Kenneth C Dods; Christopher D May; Zi X Tai; E H Clayton; Emma E Lynch
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-12

5.  Digestibility and palatability of Virginia fanpetals (Sida hermaphrodita R.) silage in sheep.

Authors:  Cezary Purwin; Marta Borsuk-Stanulewicz; Zenon Nogalski; Maja Baranowska; Aleksandra Zygmuntowicz; Jacek P Michalski
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2022-02-22

6.  Effects of Dietary Barley Starch Contents on the Performance, Nutrient Digestion, Rumen Fermentation, and Bacterial Community of Fattening Hu Sheep.

Authors:  Xiaowen Ma; Wenjing Zhou; Tongqing Guo; Fei Li; Fadi Li; Tao Ran; Zhian Zhang; Long Guo
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-01-27

7.  Characterization of microbial intolerances and ruminal dysbiosis towards different dietary carbohydrate sources using an in vitro model.

Authors:  Parisa Kheirandish; Renee Maxine Petri; Arife Sener-Aydemir; Heidi Elisabeth Schwartz-Zimmermann; Franz Berthiller; Qendrim Zebeli; Cátia Pacífico
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.059

8.  Performance and Metabolism of Calves Fed Starter Feed Containing Sugarcane Molasses or Glucose Syrup as a Replacement for Corn.

Authors:  C E Oltramari; G G O Nápoles; M R De Paula; J T Silva; M P C Gallo; M H O Pasetti; C M M Bittar
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Composition of Ileal Bacterial Community in Grazing Goats Varies across Non-rumination, Transition and Rumination Stages of Life.

Authors:  Jinzhen Jiao; Jian Wu; Chuanshe Zhou; Shaoxun Tang; Min Wang; Zhiliang Tan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Relationship between rumen ciliate protozoa and biohydrogenation fatty acid profile in rumen and meat of lambs.

Authors:  Alexandra Eduarda Francisco; José Manuel Santos-Silva; Ana Paula V Portugal; Susana Paula Alves; Rui José B Bessa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.