Literature DB >> 22444078

An effective rotational mating scheme for inbreeding reduction in captive populations illustrated by the rare sheep breed Kempisch Heideschaap.

J J Windig1, L Kaal.   

Abstract

Within breeds and other captive populations, the risk of high inbreeding rates and loss of diversity can be high within (small) herds or subpopulations. When exchange of animals between different subpopulations is organised according to a rotational mating scheme, inbreeding rates can be restricted. Two such schemes, a breeding circle and a maximum avoidance of inbreeding scheme, are compared. In a breeding circle, flocks are organised in a circle where each flock serves as a donor flock for another flock, and the same donor-recipient combination is used in each breeding season. In the maximum inbreeding avoidance scheme, donor-recipient combinations change each year so that the use of the same combination is postponed as long as possible. Data from the Kempisch Heideschaap were used with computer simulations to determine the long-term effects of different breeding schemes. Without exchanging rams between flocks, high inbreeding rates (>1.5% per year) occurred. Both rotational mating schemes reduced inbreeding rates to on average 0.16% per year and variation across flocks in inbreeding rates, caused by differences in flock size, almost disappeared. Inbreeding rates with maximum inbreeding avoidance were more variable than with a breeding circle. Moreover, a breeding circle is easier to implement and operate. Breeding circles are thus efficient and flexible and can also be efficient for other captive populations, such as zoo populations of endangered wild species.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 22444078     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731108003029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  6 in total

1.  Genetic diversity and the application of runs of homozygosity-based methods for inbreeding estimation in German White-headed Mutton sheep.

Authors:  Sowah Addo; Stefanie Klingel; Georg Thaller; Dirk Hinrichs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Genetic analysis of a rat model of aerobic capacity and metabolic fitness.

Authors:  Yu-Yu Ren; Katherine A Overmyer; Nathan R Qi; Mary K Treutelaar; Lori Heckenkamp; Molly Kalahar; Lauren G Koch; Steven L Britton; Charles F Burant; Jun Z Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Genomic diversity dynamics in conserved chicken populations are revealed by genome-wide SNPs.

Authors:  Mengmeng Zhang; Wei Han; Hui Tang; Guohui Li; Minjie Zhang; Ran Xu; Yijun Liu; Tao Yang; Wenting Li; Jianmin Zou; Keliang Wu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Keep Garfagnina alive. An integrated study on patterns of homozygosity, genomic inbreeding, admixture and breed traceability of the Italian Garfagnina goat breed.

Authors:  Christos Dadousis; Francesca Cecchi; Michela Ablondi; Maria Chiara Fabbri; Alessandra Stella; Riccardo Bozzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Whole-genome SNP markers reveal conservation status, signatures of selection, and introgression in Chinese Laiwu pigs.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Wang; Hui Zhang; Min Huang; Jianhong Tang; Lijuan Yang; Zhiqiang Yu; Desen Li; Guixin Li; Yongchuang Jiang; Yanxiao Sun; Shudong Wei; Pan Xu; Jun Ren
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Retriever and Pointer: Software to Evaluate Inbreeding and Genetic Management in Captive Populations.

Authors:  Jack J Windig; Ina Hulsegge
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.