Literature DB >> 22443939

Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands.

J F Soussana1, T Tallec, V Blanfort.   

Abstract

Soil carbon sequestration (enhanced sinks) is the mechanism responsible for most of the greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential in the agriculture sector. Carbon sequestration in grasslands can be determined directly by measuring changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and indirectly by measuring the net balance of C fluxes. A literature search shows that grassland C sequestration reaches on average 5 ± 30 g C/m2 per year according to inventories of SOC stocks and -231 and 77 g C/m2 per year for drained organic and mineral soils, respectively, according to C flux balance. Off-site C sequestration occurs whenever more manure C is produced by than returned to a grassland plot. The sum of on- and off-site C sequestration reaches 129, 98 and 71 g C/m2 per year for grazed, cut and mixed European grasslands on mineral soils, respectively, however with high uncertainty. A range of management practices reduce C losses and increase C sequestration: (i) avoiding soil tillage and the conversion of grasslands to arable use, (ii) moderately intensifying nutrient-poor permanent grasslands, (iii) using light grazing instead of heavy grazing, (iv) increasing the duration of grass leys; (v) converting grass leys to grass-legume mixtures or to permanent grasslands. With nine European sites, direct emissions of N2O from soil and of CH4 from enteric fermentation at grazing, expressed in CO2 equivalents, compensated 10% and 34% of the on-site grassland C sequestration, respectively. Digestion inside the barn of the harvested herbage leads to further emissions of CH4 and N2O by the production systems, which were estimated at 130 g CO2 equivalents/m2 per year. The net balance of on- and off-site C sequestration, CH4 and N2O emissions reached 38 g CO2 equivalents/m2 per year, indicating a non-significant net sink activity. This net balance was, however, negative for intensively managed cut sites indicating a source to the atmosphere. In conclusion, this review confirms that grassland C sequestration has a strong potential to partly mitigate the GHG balance of ruminant production systems. However, as soil C sequestration is both reversible and vulnerable to disturbance, biodiversity loss and climate change, CH4 and N2O emissions from the livestock sector need to be reduced and current SOC stocks preserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22443939     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731109990784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  23 in total

1.  Grassland-Cropping Rotations: An Avenue for Agricultural Diversification to Reconcile High Production with Environmental Quality.

Authors:  Gilles Lemaire; François Gastal; Alan Franzluebbers; Abad Chabbi
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Tropical grasslands: A pivotal place for a more multi-functional agriculture.

Authors:  Maryline Boval; Valérie Angeon; Tom Rudel
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Can short-term pasture management increase C balance in the Atlantic Rainforest?

Authors:  Paulo Roberto da Rocha Junior; Felipe Vaz Andrade; Lucas Santos Satiro; Guilherme Kangussú Donagemma; Eduardo de Sá Mendonça
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Mangrove blue carbon strategies for climate change mitigation are most effective at the national scale.

Authors:  Pierre Taillardat; Daniel A Friess; Massimo Lupascu
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  The Impacts of Climate Change Mitigation Strategies on Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Sara Shields; Geoffrey Orme-Evans
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Mapping the landscape of climate engineering.

Authors:  P Oldham; B Szerszynski; J Stilgoe; C Brown; B Eacott; A Yuille
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Nutrient provision capacity of alternative livestock farming systems per area of arable farmland required.

Authors:  M R F Lee; J P Domingues; G A McAuliffe; M Tichit; F Accatino; T Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluation of Feed Strategies and Changes of Stocking Rate to Decrease the Carbon Footprint in a Traditional Cow-Calf System: A Simulation Model.

Authors:  Paula Toro-Mujica
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-09

9.  Potential of legume-based grassland-livestock systems in Europe: a review.

Authors:  A Lüscher; I Mueller-Harvey; J F Soussana; R M Rees; J L Peyraud
Journal:  Grass Forage Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability.

Authors:  Christian Schader; Adrian Muller; Nadia El-Hage Scialabba; Judith Hecht; Anne Isensee; Karl-Heinz Erb; Pete Smith; Harinder P S Makkar; Peter Klocke; Florian Leiber; Patrizia Schwegler; Matthias Stolze; Urs Niggli
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.