Literature DB >> 22443914

Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs.

B Lebret1.   

Abstract

Animal growth performance and quality of pork depend on the interactive effects of pig genotype, rearing conditions, pre-slaughter handling, and carcass and meat processing. This paper focuses on the effects of feeding and rearing systems (feeding level and diet composition, housing, production system, etc.) on growth performance, carcass composition, and eating and technological qualities of pork. The feeding level and protein : energy ratio can be used to manipulate growth rate or composition of weight gain. Restricted feed allowance strongly reduces growth rate and carcass fatness and also intramuscular fat (IMF) level, resulting in decreased meat tenderness or juiciness. Expression of compensatory growth due to restricted followed by ad libitum feeding modifies the composition of weight gain at both carcass and muscle levels, and may improve meat tenderness due to higher in vivo protein turnover. Decreasing the protein : energy ratio of the diet actually increases IMF and improves eating quality, but gives fatter carcasses. In contrast, a progressive reduction in the protein : energy ratio leads to similar carcass composition at slaughter but with higher IMF. Technological meat traits (pH1, pHu, colour, drip loss) are generally not affected by the level or protein : energy in feed. Modification of fatty acid composition and antioxidant level in meat can be obtained through diet supplementations (e.g. vegetable sources with high n-3 fatty acids), thereby improving the nutritional quality of pork. Influences of pig rearing system on animal performance, carcass and meat traits result from interactive effects of housing (floor type, space allowance, ambient temperature, physical activity), feeding level and genotype in specific production systems. Indoor enrichment (more space, straw bedding) generally increases growth rate and carcass fatness, and may improve meat juiciness or flavour through higher IMF. Outdoor rearing and organic production system have various effects on growth rate and carcass fatness, depending on climatic conditions and feed allowance. Influence on meat quality is also controversial: higher drip and lower pHu and tenderness have been reported, whereas some studies show improved meat juiciness with outdoor rearing. Discrepancies are likely due to differences between studies in rearing conditions and physiological responses of pigs to pre-slaughter handling. Specific production systems of the Mediterranean area based on local breeds (low growth rate, high adiposity) and free-range finishing (pasture, forests), which allows pig to express their genetic potential for IMF deposition, clearly demonstrate the positive effects of genotype × rearing system interactions on the quality of pork and pork products.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 22443914     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731108002796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  18 in total

1.  Physicochemical characteristics and sensory attributes of meat from heavy-weight Iberian and F1 Large White × Landrace pigs finished intensively or in free-range conditions.

Authors:  J Almeida; M C Bressan; J Santos-Silva; O Moreira; C Bettencourt; L T Gama
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Comparison of muscle transcriptome between pigs with divergent meat quality phenotypes identifies genes related to muscle metabolism and structure.

Authors:  Marie Damon; Joanna Wyszynska-Koko; Annie Vincent; Frédéric Hérault; Bénédicte Lebret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of Performance, Meat Lipids and Oxidative Status of Pigs from Commercial Breed and Organic Crossbreed.

Authors:  Giuseppe Martino; Cecilia Mugnai; Dario Compagnone; Lisa Grotta; Michele Del Carlo; Francesca Sarti
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Compositional Signatures of Conventional, Free Range, and Organic Pork Meat Using Fingerprint Techniques.

Authors:  Gislene B Oliveira; Martin Alewijn; Rita Boerrigter-Eenling; Saskia M van Ruth
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2015-08-25

5.  Effects of feed allowance and indispensable amino acid reduction on feed intake, growth performance and carcass characteristics of growing pigs.

Authors:  Stefano Schiavon; Mirco Dalla Bona; Giuseppe Carcò; Luca Carraro; Lutz Bunger; Luigi Gallo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Modeling host-microbiome interactions for the prediction of meat quality and carcass composition traits in swine.

Authors:  Piush Khanal; Christian Maltecca; Clint Schwab; Justin Fix; Matteo Bergamaschi; Francesco Tiezzi
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Protein Restriction with Amino Acid-Balanced Diets Shrinks Circulating Pool Size of Amino Acid by Decreasing Expression of Specific Transporters in the Small Intestine.

Authors:  Kai Qiu; Chun Fu Qin; Min Luo; Xin Zhang; Wen Juan Sun; Ning Jiao; De Fa Li; Jing Dong Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  How Muscle Structure and Composition Influence Meat and Flesh Quality.

Authors:  Anne Listrat; Bénédicte Lebret; Isabelle Louveau; Thierry Astruc; Muriel Bonnet; Louis Lefaucheur; Brigitte Picard; Jérôme Bugeon
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2016-02-28

Review 9.  The Effects of Diet on the Proportion of Intramuscular Fat in Human Muscle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Dhanveer Singh; Shereen Khattab; Jessica Babineau; Dinesh Kumbhare
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-02-20

10.  Role of AMPK signalling pathway during compensatory growth in pigs.

Authors:  Maria Ballester; Marcel Amills; Olga González-Rodríguez; Tainã F Cardoso; Mariam Pascual; Rayner González-Prendes; Núria Panella-Riera; Isabel Díaz; Joan Tibau; Raquel Quintanilla
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.