Literature DB >> 22443737

Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behaviour and meat quality: comparison of free range and conventionally raised pigs.

P Barton Gade1.   

Abstract

Free range pigs, born outdoors and reared after weaning in enriched indoor accommodation, were compared with conventionally raised pigs from a farm, matched for effects on meat quality, with respect to behaviour during transport and lairage, blood chemistry at slaughter and meat quality characteristics. Pigs were either kept in farm pen groups or were mixed at loading and kept in the groups, so formed, until slaughter. Free range pigs tended to settle faster during the 2½ h transport and 2 h lairage than conventionally raised pigs and were more likely to lie as resting posture during transport. Mixing at loading had no effect on posture during transport or during lairage for free range pigs but mixed conventionally raised pigs showed a greater variability in posture during lairage compared to non-mixed conventionally raised pigs, presumably as a result of disturbance from fighting conspecifics. Conventionally raised and free range pigs showed similar levels of aggression during transport but conventionally raised pigs were more aggressive during the lairage (average for mixed groups 12 v. 2 fights, P < 0.001). Aggressive interactions, such as one-way bites, were almost exclusively confined to mixed groups and all fights with mutual biting in mixed groups occurred solely between unfamiliar animals. The frequency of unacceptable skin damage in the middle and shoulder was highest in conventionally raised pigs and in mixed groups. Cortisol concentration and creatine kinase (CK) activity in slaughter blood were not affected by the rearing system. Mixing did not affect cortisol concentrations but led to higher CK activities compared to non-mixing (957 v. 588 U/l, respectively, P < 0.05). The rate of pH fall after slaughter was not affected by the rearing system but muscle temperatures early post mortem were highest in free range pigs. Mixing did not affect pH or temperature early post mortem. Neither rearing system nor mixing at loading affected ultimate pH or internal reflectance (meat quality marbling values).

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 22443737     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731108002565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  4 in total

1.  Preslaughter handling practices and their effects on animal welfare and pork quality.

Authors:  Luigi Faucitano
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The effect of mixing entire male pigs prior to transport to slaughter on behaviour, welfare and carcass lesions.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Dayane Lemos Teixeira; Alison Hanlon; Laura Ann Boyle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Skin lesion monitoring at slaughter on heavy pigs (170 kg): Welfare indicators and ham defects.

Authors:  Mattia Bottacini; Annalisa Scollo; Sandra A Edwards; Barbara Contiero; Martina Veloci; Vincenzo Pace; Flaviana Gottardo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Do Pigs Have Adequate Space in Animal Transportation Vehicles?-Planimetric Measurement of the Floor Area Covered by Finishing Pigs in Various Body Positions.

Authors:  Heidi Arndt; Nina Volkmann; Birgit Spindler; Jörg Hartung; Nicole Kemper
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-01-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.