S F Ehrlich1, B Eskenazi, M M Hedderson, A Ferrara. 1. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, California 94612, USA. samantha.ehrlich@kp.org
Abstract
AIMS: It has long been hypothesized that natural selection would favour a reproductive strategy biased towards females under adverse circumstances in order to maximize the number of surviving grandchildren. An excess of daughters in women with Type 1 diabetes and a greater likelihood of gestational diabetes in women carrying male fetuses have also been reported. This study aims to compare the sex ratio across categories of maternal glycaemia. METHODS: Among 288,009 mother-infant pairs delivering at Kaiser Permanente Northern California in 1996-2008, sex ratios were calculated for the following categories: pregravid diabetes, gestational diabetes, mild pregnancy hyperglycaemia (defined as an abnormal screening but normal diagnostic test for gestational diabetes) and normoglycaemia. Odds ratios for delivering a male were estimated with logistic regression; normoglycaemic pregnancies comprised the reference. RESULTS: Women with pregravid diabetes delivered the fewest males (ratio male/female = 1.01), followed by women with normoglycaemic pregnancies and those with an abnormal screening only (both sex ratios = 1.05); women with gestational diabetes delivered the most males (sex ratio = 1.07). Odds ratio estimates suggested the same pattern, but none attained statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The crude sex ratios in this cohort suggest a possible gradient by category of maternal glycaemia. Women with gestational diabetes, a condition characterized by excessive fuel substrates, appear to deliver more males. Women with pregravid diabetes delivered the fewest males, possibly reflecting the unfavourable state of chronic disease.
AIMS: It has long been hypothesized that natural selection would favour a reproductive strategy biased towards females under adverse circumstances in order to maximize the number of surviving grandchildren. An excess of daughters in women with Type 1 diabetes and a greater likelihood of gestational diabetes in women carrying male fetuses have also been reported. This study aims to compare the sex ratio across categories of maternal glycaemia. METHODS: Among 288,009 mother-infant pairs delivering at Kaiser Permanente Northern California in 1996-2008, sex ratios were calculated for the following categories: pregravid diabetes, gestational diabetes, mild pregnancy hyperglycaemia (defined as an abnormal screening but normal diagnostic test for gestational diabetes) and normoglycaemia. Odds ratios for delivering a male were estimated with logistic regression; normoglycaemic pregnancies comprised the reference. RESULTS:Women with pregravid diabetes delivered the fewest males (ratio male/female = 1.01), followed by women with normoglycaemic pregnancies and those with an abnormal screening only (both sex ratios = 1.05); women with gestational diabetes delivered the most males (sex ratio = 1.07). Odds ratio estimates suggested the same pattern, but none attained statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The crude sex ratios in this cohort suggest a possible gradient by category of maternal glycaemia. Women with gestational diabetes, a condition characterized by excessive fuel substrates, appear to deliver more males. Women with pregravid diabetes delivered the fewest males, possibly reflecting the unfavourable state of chronic disease.
Authors: Monique M Hedderson; Jeanne A Darbinian; Charles P Quesenberry; Assiamira Ferrara Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Zoe A Broere-Brown; Maria C Adank; Laura Benschop; Myrte Tielemans; Taulant Muka; Romy Gonçalves; Wichor M Bramer; Josje D Schoufour; Trudy Voortman; Eric A P Steegers; Oscar H Franco; Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 5.027
Authors: Ilhame Diboun; Manjunath Ramanjaneya; Yasser Majeed; Lina Ahmed; Mohammed Bashir; Alexandra E Butler; Abdul Badi Abou-Samra; Stephen L Atkin; Nayef A Mazloum; Mohamed A Elrayess Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 5.531