Literature DB >> 22443293

Effectiveness and safety of tapentadol prolonged release for severe, chronic low back pain with or without a neuropathic pain component: results of an open-label, phase 3b study.

Ilona Steigerwald1, Matthias Müller, Anthony Davies, Daniel Samper, Rainer Sabatowski, Ralf Baron, Sylvie Rozenberg, Anna Szczepanska-Szerej, Antonio Gatti, Hans G Kress.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This open-label, phase 3b study evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of tapentadol prolonged release and tapentadol immediate release (for acute pain episodes) for severe, chronic low back pain with or without a neuropathic pain component that was inadequately managed in patients taking World Health Organization (WHO) Step I or II analgesics or who were not regularly treated with analgesics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Average baseline pain intensity was greater than 5 (11-point numerical rating scale-3 [NRS-3; 3-day average pain intensity]) with WHO Step I or II analgesics and greater than 6 with no regular analgesic regimen. WHO Step II analgesics were discontinued before starting study treatment; WHO Step I analgesics or co-analgesics were continued at the same dose. Patients received tapentadol prolonged release (50-250 mg bid) during a 5-week titration and 7-week maintenance period. Tapentadol immediate release was permitted for acute pain episodes (tapentadol prolonged release and immediate release maximum combined dose, ≤500 mg/day). The painDETECT questionnaire was used to define subsets of patients based on the probability of a neuropathic pain component to their low back pain as 'negative', 'unclear', or 'positive'. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00983385. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 6 in average pain intensity (NRS-3), using the last observation carried forward to impute missing scores.
RESULTS: In the painDETECT negative (n = 49) and unclear/positive (n = 126) subsets, respectively, mean (SD) changes in pain intensity from baseline to week 6 were -2.4 (2.18) and -3.0 (2.07; both p < 0.0001). Among patients who had not received prior WHO Step II treatment, lower doses of tapentadol prolonged release were generally required with increasing likelihood of a neuropathic pain component. Based on the painDETECT questionnaire and the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), tapentadol prolonged release treatment was also associated with significant improvements in neuropathic pain symptoms, with decreases in the number of pain attacks and the duration of spontaneous pain in the last 24 hours in patients with low back pain with a neuropathic pain component (painDETECT unclear or positive score at baseline or screening). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (incidence ≥10%, n = 176) were nausea, dizziness, headache, dry mouth, fatigue, constipation, diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, and somnolence.
CONCLUSIONS: Tapentadol prolonged release was well tolerated and effective for managing severe, chronic low back pain with or without a neuropathic pain component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22443293     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2012.679254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  28 in total

1.  Successful use of stellate ganglion block and a new centrally acting analgesic with dual mode of action in a resistant temporomandibular joint pain.

Authors:  Gareth Peter Jones; Shiva Shankar Tripathi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-20

Review 2.  Evaluation and Management of SCI-Associated Pain.

Authors:  Michael Saulino; Justin F Averna
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-09

3.  Tapentadol in neuropathic pain cancer patients: a prospective open label study.

Authors:  Edvina Galiè; Veronica Villani; Irene Terrenato; Andrea Pace
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Neuropathic Pain and Spinal Cord Injury: Phenotypes and Pharmacological Management.

Authors:  Eva Widerström-Noga
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  [Prolonged-release tapentadol for phantom pain. A case series].

Authors:  K-U Kern; P Bialas; D Fangmann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  The mu-opioid receptor agonist/noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (MOR-NRI) concept in analgesia: the case of tapentadol.

Authors:  Thomas M Tzschentke; Thomas Christoph; Babette Y Kögel
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Personalized medicine and opioid analgesic prescribing for chronic pain: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Stephen Bruehl; A Vania Apkarian; Jane C Ballantyne; Ann Berger; David Borsook; Wen G Chen; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Susan D Horn; Michael J Iadarola; Charles E Inturrisi; Lixing Lao; Sean Mackey; Jianren Mao; Andrea Sawczuk; George R Uhl; James Witter; Clifford J Woolf; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Yu Lin
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 8.  Understanding osteoporotic pain and its pharmacological treatment.

Authors:  R Vellucci; R Terenzi; J A Kanis; H G Kress; R D Mediati; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; M L Brandi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Osteoarthritis pain: nociceptive or neuropathic?

Authors:  Matthew Thakur; Anthony H Dickenson; Ralf Baron
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 20.543

10.  Effect of tapentadol on experimental model of orofacial pain - a pilot study.

Authors:  J Fricová; H Lainczová; J Nedvídek; R Rokyta
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.