Literature DB >> 22443214

Identification of expressed resistance gene-like sequences by data mining in 454-derived transcriptomic sequences of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Zhanji Liu1, Mollee Crampton, Antonette Todd, Venu Kalavacharla.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the most important legumes in the world. Several diseases severely reduce bean production and quality; therefore, it is very important to better understand disease resistance in common bean in order to prevent these losses. More than 70 resistance (R) genes which confer resistance against various pathogens have been cloned from diverse plant species. Most R genes share highly conserved domains which facilitates the identification of new candidate R genes from the same species or other species. The goals of this study were to isolate expressed R gene-like sequences (RGLs) from 454-derived transcriptomic sequences and expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of common bean, and to develop RGL-tagged molecular markers.
RESULTS: A data-mining approach was used to identify tentative P. vulgaris R gene-like sequences from approximately 1.69 million 454-derived sequences and 116,716 ESTs deposited in GenBank. A total of 365 non-redundant sequences were identified and named as common bean (P. vulgaris = Pv) resistance gene-like sequences (PvRGLs). Among the identified PvRGLs, about 60% (218 PvRGLs) were from 454-derived sequences. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis confirmed that PvRGLs were actually expressed in the leaves of common bean. Upon comparison to P. vulgaris genomic sequences, 105 (28.77%) of the 365 tentative PvRGLs could be integrated into the existing common bean physical map. Based on the syntenic blocks between common bean and soybean, 237 (64.93%) PvRGLs were anchored on the P. vulgaris genetic map and will need to be mapped to determine order. In addition, 11 sequence-tagged-site (STS) and 19 cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) molecular markers were developed for 25 unique PvRGLs.
CONCLUSIONS: In total, 365 PvRGLs were successfully identified from 454-derived transcriptomic sequences and ESTs available in GenBank and about 65% of PvRGLs were integrated into the common bean genetic map. A total of 30 RGL-tagged markers were developed for 25 unique PvRGLs, including 11 STS and 19 CAPS markers. The expressed PvRGLs identified in this study provide a large sequence resource for development of RGL-tagged markers that could be used further for genetic mapping of disease resistant candidate genes and quantitative trait locus/loci (QTLs). This work also represents an additional method for identifying expressed RGLs from next generation sequencing data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22443214      PMCID: PMC3353201          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Plant Biol        ISSN: 1471-2229            Impact factor:   4.215


Background

Plant resistance genes (R genes) play an important role in direct or indirect recognition of proteins encoded by specific avirulence (Avr) genes of pathogens [1]. In recent years, a large number of R genes which confer resistance to diverse pathogens have been cloned from different plant species by using either map-based cloning or transposon tagging approaches [2-5]. Based on the amino acid sequence comparison among cloned R genes, several highly conserved domains, such as NBS, LRR, protein kinase (PK), transmembrane domain (TM), and TIR were identified as the majority of known R genes [6-9]. These distinct conserved domains provide scientists a convenient way to identify and then clone additional R genes and RGLs or resistance gene analogs (RGAs). The largest class consists of R genes which contain NBS and LRR domains (NBS-LRR). This class can be further divided into two sub-classes, TIR-NBS-LRR and non-TIR-NBS-LRR, based on the presence or absence of a TIR domain at the N-terminus [7,10]. The second class of R genes is comprised of those with LRR and PK domains (LRR-PK), such as Fls2 in Arabidopsis and Xa21 in rice [11,12]. The third class contains those with a large extracellular LRR domain, for example, Cf-4 in tomato and Vf1 in apple [13,14]. The fourth class contains those only with the PK domain, such as Pto in tomato and Pbs1 in Arabidopsis [15,16]. And finally, the fifth class includes all other R genes that confer resistance through different mechanisms, for example, Hm1 in maize and mlo in barley [3,17]. Based on conserved domains of known R genes, PCR amplification has been successfully used to isolate RGLs or RGAs from Arabidopsis [18,19], soybean [20-22], rice [23], maize [24,25], wheat [26], and many other plant species [27-30]. For example, Bertioli et al. isolated 78 RGAs from cultivated and wild peanuts by using degenerate primers designed on NBS conserved domains [31]. Leal-Bertioli et al. identified candidate genome regions for disease resistances by using a combination of NBS profiling, sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers, and Southern blot by probes with NBS encoding regions [32]. In common bean, eight classes of disease resistance related sequences and 15 RGAs have been isolated based on the conserved NBS and TIR domains [33,34]. An RGA, SB1, was found to cosegregate with the Crg gene which is known to be responsible for resistance to the rust pathogen Uromyces appendiculatus [35]. Recently, data-mining approaches have been employed to identify RGLs and RGAs from plant EST databases. In maize, 199 RGLs have been identified using data-mining, modified amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) methods [25]. In sugarcane, Rossi et al. identified 88 R-gene-like ESTs via the data-mining method [36]. In wheat, Dilbirligi and Gill found 220 expressed R-gene candidates using modified RNA fingerprinting and data-mining approaches [37]. In Medicago, Zhu et al. have revealed 179 unique NBS-LRR RGLs by using combination methods of database queries, hybridization with RGLs from related species, and PCR [38]. With the availability of several complete and nearly complete plant genome sequences, R gene analyses at the whole genome level have been carried out in Arabidopsis [10], rice [39], Medicago [40], and Lotus [41]. As a result, 149 NBS-LRR-encoding genes and an additional 58 related genes have been identified in the Arabidopsis genome [10]. Also 489 predicted NBS-LRR genes were identified in the rice genome, all of which belong to the non-TIR-NBS-LRR class [39]. From the Medicago truncatula draft genome (Mt1.0), Ameline-Torregrosa et al. have identified 333 non-redundant NBS-LRRs and predicted 400 to 500 NBS-LRRs in the full genome [40]. In the Lotus genome, 158 NBS-encoding sequences have been isolated and nearly 40% of them are pseudogenes encoding incomplete protein sequences [41]. With advances in sequencing technologies over the past few years, next-generation sequencing technologies have become widely available and have dramatically accelerated biological research [42], making identification of R gene homologs and members of other related gene families by data-mining methods much more efficient. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the most important legume crops in the world. Due to its high protein and low fat content, it has become a principal source of dietary protein and fiber in many developing countries, especially those in Eastern and Southern Africa and Latin America [43]. Diseases such as anthracnose, angular leaf spot (ALS), rust, common bacterial blight (CBB), and Bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV) highly reduce bean production and quality. For example, CBB is a serious seed-borne disease that can cause over 40% yield loss in both temperate and tropical bean production regions [44]. Rust can cause 18% to 100% yield loss of susceptible bean genotypes under favorable environmental conditions [45]. Therefore, it is very important to better understand disease resistance in common bean. The objective of this study was to identify expressed RGLs from common bean and to develop RGL-tagged molecular markers for genetic mapping of candidate genes and QTLs for disease resistance.

Results

Identification of RGLs from 454 sequences and ESTs in GenBank

More than 1.69 million sequences with 349,977,079 base pairs (SRA028837) were generated by 454 sequencing from an adapter-ligated normalized cDNA collection from four different plant organs (leaves, flowers, roots, and pods) of common bean. After clustering and assembling using the Newbler software from Roche (Branford, CT), these sequences were assembled into 39,572 contigs and 19,723 singletons with sequence size more than 100 base pairs [46]. Moreover, 116,716 common bean ESTs are available in GenBank (verified on July 7, 2011). Therefore, a total of 176,011 sequences were used for identification of RGLs. Full length protein sequences of the 50 known R genes (Table 1) were used to perform tBLASTn searches against 454-derived sequences and common bean ESTs in GenBank. A total of 259 contigs and nine singletons from 454-derived sequences and 629 common bean ESTs were identified with scores more than or equal to 100 and E values less than or equal to 1e-10. After clustering, 365 non-redundant sequences were developed and considered as tentative P. vulgaris RGLs, named as PvRGLs (See Additional file 1: sequences of 365 tentative PvRGLs). The average size of PvRGLs was about 1,110 base pairs, although some fragments were 2,500 base pairs or longer. Among these 365 tentative PvRGLs, 166 (45.48%) PvRGLs were from 454-derived sequences, 147 (40.27%) were from common bean ESTs, and 52 (14.25%) PvRGLs were present in both of the groups (See Additional file 2: Characterization of 365 tentative PvRGLs).
Table 1

Fifty known R genes from plants used in this study [2]

PlantR genesProtein IDStructurePlantR genesProtein IDStructure
AppleVf1CAC40825LRRPotatoR1AAU95638NBS-LRR


Fls2BAB11088LRR-PKRgc1AAF76163NBS-LRR


Pbs1ABR46085PKRxCAB50786NBS-LRR

ArabidopsisRpm1CAA61131NBS-LRRRicePibBAA76282NBS-LRR


Rpp1AAC72977NBS-LRRPi-taBAF91352NBS-LRR


Rpp4AAM18462NBS-LRRRpr1BAA75812NBS-LRR


Rpp5AAF08790NBS-LRRXa1BAA25068NBS-LRR


Rpp8AAC78631NBS-LRRXa21AAC80225LRR-PK


Rpp13AAF42832NBS-LRRXa26ABD36512LRR-PK


Rps2AAM90883NBS-LRRSugarbeetHs1AAW03319LRR-TM

Rps4CAB50708NBS-LRRTobaccoNAAA50763NBS-LRR

Rps5AAC26126NBS-LRRCf-2AAC15779LRR-TM


Rpw8ACJ05900TMCf-4CAA05268LRR-TM


Ssi4AAN86124NBS-LRRCf-5AAC78591LRR-TM


Rcy1AAM13905NBS-LRRCf-9CAA05274LRR-TM


BarleyRpg1ABK51312PKTomatoHeroCAD29728NBS-LRR


Mla1AAG37354NBS-LRRI2AAD27815NBS-LRR


Mla6CAC29242NBS-LRRMi-1AAC67238NBS-LRR


MloCAB06083TMPrfAAC49408NBS-LRR


FlaxL6AAA91022NBS-LRRPtoAAB47421PK


MAAB47618NBS-LRRSw-5ACQ42910NBS-LRR

P2AAK28806NBS-LRRCre3CAD12795NBS-LRR


MaizeHm1AAC04333Toxin reductaseWheatVRGL 1AAF19148NBS-LRR


Rp1-dAAD47197NBS-LRRYr10AAG42168NBS-LRR

LettuceDm3AAD03156NBS-LRRPepperBs2AAF09256NBS-LRR
Fifty known R genes from plants used in this study [2] In addition, all tentative PvRGLs were used to identify their putative functions by BLASTX searches against the GenBank databases. Among the 365 tentative PvRGLs, 29 belonged to the NBS-LRR class, 96 belonged to the LRR, LRR-TM, and LRR-PK classes, 229 belonged to the PK class, six were similar to R gene reated sequences with putative TM domains, and five showed high similarity to R genes with Toxin reductase domains (See Additional file 2: Characterization of 365 tentative PvRGLs).

Validation of expression of selected RGLs

In order to determine whether the identified PvRGLs from common bean were expressed, cDNA was prepared from two-week old leaves of the genotype Sierra grown in the greenhouse. RT-PCR was then used to amplify with primers specific to each of the 27 selected PvRGLs. Twenty four of the 27 primer pairs produced a single product and we showed amplification of 15 of these primer pairs (Figure 1). Furthermore, to ensure that the amplification products actually amplified from expressed mRNA and not from contaminating DNA, we used genomic DNA, cDNA, cDNA control (no reverse transcriptase added to reverse transcription reaction), and water as templates to perform RT-PCR and the results showed that only DNA and cDNA have specific products, while cDNA control and water have no products (Figure 1). Based on these results, we concluded that there was no DNA contamination in the cDNA and our PvRGLs were indeed expressed.
Figure 1

Validation of fifteen selected tentative PvRGLs by RT-PCR. Confirmation of absence of DNA contamination is shown in lanes 1-4 where RT-PCR amplification was carried out with primers designed from contig11286 in lanes with genomic DNA, leaf cDNA, leaf cDNA control (no reverse transcriptase added to reverse transcription reaction), and water as template to check DNA contamination. In lanes 5-18, RT-PCR products derived by amplification from an additional 14 common bean RGLs using leaf cDNA as a template are shown. M: 50 bp ladder.

Validation of fifteen selected tentative PvRGLs by RT-PCR. Confirmation of absence of DNA contamination is shown in lanes 1-4 where RT-PCR amplification was carried out with primers designed from contig11286 in lanes with genomic DNA, leaf cDNA, leaf cDNA control (no reverse transcriptase added to reverse transcription reaction), and water as template to check DNA contamination. In lanes 5-18, RT-PCR products derived by amplification from an additional 14 common bean RGLs using leaf cDNA as a template are shown. M: 50 bp ladder.

Mapping identified PvRGLs to the P. vulgaris genome

Mapping of the identified PvRGLs is important for isolation of candidates of a particular resistance gene or quantitative trait locus (QTL). Recently, a Finger_Printed Contigs (FPC) physical map has been established for common bean http://phaseolus.genomics.purdue.edu/ with about 9X coverage of the genome [47]. The common bean FPCs makes it possible to integrate some of the PvRGLs into the physical map by comparison to BAC-end sequences [45]. BLASTn search was used to determine those PvRGLs matching to a BAC-end sequence with the criteria of scores more than or equal to 100 and E values less than or equal to 1e-50. As a result, 105 (28.77%) of the 365 tentative PvRGLs matched to BAC-end sequences with minimum criteria and could be integrated into the physical map (see Additional file 3: list of 105 tentative PvRGLs having matches to a BAC-end sequences). Interestingly, there were five cases of two PvRGLs and three cases of three PvRGLs located to one physical contig: for example, PvRGL093 and PvRGL233 were located in the P. vulgaris physical map FPC_Contig13 while PvRGL266, PvRGL275 and PvRGL365 were located in the P. vulgaris physical map FPC_Contig137. Surprisingly, PvRGL083 and PvRGL236 have a match to different regions of the same BAC-end sequence PV_GBa0056B11.r (EI454956). Another seven PvRGLs matched to a Genome Survey Sequence (GSS) with E value less than 1e-50 from other common bean genotypes in GenBank.

Mapping PvRGLs to G. max pseudomolecules and P. vulgaris genetic map

In order to take advantage of the synteny blocks between common bean and soybean as per McClean et al. [48], we used the BLASTn algorithm to search against soybean genome with the same criteria as McClean et al. [48]. Given that nearly every common bean locus can match to two soybean loci, the best two soybean hits were selected. Out of 365 PvRGLs, 360 (98.63%) PvRGLs could be mapped to the G. max genome pseudomolecules. Among the 360 PvRGLs, 343 (95.28%) have soybean hits with E value less than 1e-50. The 360 PvRGLs are broadly distributed among the 20 G. max pseudomolecules. Among the 713 soybean loci matched to 360 PvRGLs (7 PvRGLs with only one hit from soybean), 689 (96.63%) have transcripts. The annotation of these transcripts indicates most of them show high similarity to sequences containing NBS, LRR, PK, TM and toxin reductase domains (See Additional file 4: Mapping PvRGLs to G. max pseudomolecules and P. vulgaris genetic map). Based on the comparison of PvRGLs to the soybean genome sequences and the conserved blocks between common bean and soybean [48], a total of 237 (64.93%) PvRGLs can be located in the P. vulgaris genetic map. The PvRGLs are broadly distributed among the 11 P. vulgaris linkage groups, but the distribution was not even. P. vulgaris chromosome 8 (Pv8) contained the largest number of PvRGLs, 41; while Pv4 contained the least number of PvRGLs, 9 (See Additional file 4: Mapping PvRGLs to G. max pseudomolecules and P. vulgaris genetic map).

RGL-tagged molecular markers

Ninety primer pairs were designed based on the 105 PvRGLs matching to BAC-end sequences. Eighty two of ninety primer pairs (91.11%) have specific products among the six genotypes. All of the PCR products were sequenced three times from both the 5' and 3' ends to ensure polymorphisms were not due to sequencing errors. The average fragment size was about 590 base pairs, while the range was from 309 to 1,549 base pairs. Approximately 291 kb of sequence data was collected from six genotypes for sequence analysis. Sequence alignments indicated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and small insertions/deletions (InDels) occurred frequently. Twenty three SNPs were related to restriction enzyme sites, and 11 small InDels were identified. Based on small InDels, 11 RGL-tagged STS markers gave rise to distinct and polymorphic PCR bands among six genotypes (Table 2). Likewise, 19 RGL-tagged CAPS markers have been obtained from those SNPs related to restriction sites (Table 3), and each CAPS marker showed unambiguous polymorphic bands following digestion with its corresponding restriction endonuclease.
Table 2

Primer sequences and sizes of InDels for the RGL-tagged STS markers

PvRGLForward primerReverse primerInDel Sizes (bp)*
PvRGL011GAGGTCATTCACATTATCGGTTTTTCAAGTCACCACTGGCAAAG14/G

PvRGL016TGCACCATGACTGTTCTCCACCAATACCACCTCCAGCCCAAGA6/G

PvRGL041GCCTCCGTTTGAAAGTTGCTCCACGAAATATCTTACGTTTGTTTGC7/G

PvRGL049CACATTAGTAGCCTTTATGTCCCCTTCGGTCCTGTCTACAAGGT10/S, O, B, P, A

PvRGL084TGTAATCATTGACAAGCGTGGAGTTGCTTGAGCATTGATGTATTG6/G

PvRGL153AGTGATTTCCATTTATACGAGGAAAAGCCAAGTAACATTCTTCT8/S, O, B, P, A

PvRGL155GAACCAGCAATTTGTTACCGAGTAGTTGTTGAGCAACCTTTAGC6/S, O, G, B, P

PvRGL189AAGGGCAGATAACACCTCATTCGATAGTGGTTAAATTTCACCAAGG13/S, G, B, P, A

PvRGL193CAGCTATAATAACTTTGGTGGGAGCATTTAACAATGATGCAGGGAC4/S, O, G, P

PvRGL272CATCAGTCACGTTGAAGGAAGGTATGTCCCAACAATTCTTCCCG3/G

PvRGL297TTGGAGCAATGAGAAAATAGGGGTCCAGCAGAAGCCCTGTGATG3/P

*The genotypes shown in this column have insertions with the corresponding InDel size

Table 3

Primer sequences and restriction enzymes for the RGL-tagged CAPS markers

PvRGLForward primerReverse primerRestriction enzymes*
PvRGL016TGCACCATGACTGTTCTCCACCAATACCACCTCCAGCCCAAGAHindIII/G

PvRGL039CTACTCCCTCAAAGGAATCACCTGAGAAAGTTTTTGCTCAATGGDraI/B, A

PvRGL040TCTTAAAGGACGCACCTACACGATTGGCCTTCAAGACGGTTATSnaBI/G

PvRGL041GCCTCCGTTTGAAAGTTGCTCCACGAAATATCTTACGTTTGTTTGCAgeI/G

PvRGL049GAACAATGTTAGTAGTACTTCGCCGGCTTCCTCTTGAGAGTACTTTGPflMI/S, O, G, B, P

PvRGL050CACATTAGTAGCCTTTATGTCCCCTTCGGTCCTGTCTACAAGGTHindIII/G

PvRGL065CGCTTAGGAGTTGGTAGAGTAACACTCAAGGAAACACCGACAGAATGNsiI/S, O, B, P, A

PvRGL073CCAAAATCAGAAACTTTGGCATGAGAGCCCTGGGCAGGAAAGACAflII/G

PvRGL093TGGGTTACTGTTGTGACGATGTTATGTGCCCATGATCCTGGTAGDraI/O, P

PvRGL099CTTCGCCATCTCCTTGTCTATCGCCCTATGCTCAGCCTTTCTAGBglII/B, G

PvRGL102TGAAGCCCTTATGCACAGGTCCTCATCATCGCCAAACCCCAACXmnI/S, O, P

PvRGL153AGTGATTTCCATTTATACGAGGAAAAGCCAAGTAACATTCTTCTSphI/O

PvRGL155GAACCAGCAATTTGTTACCGAGTAGTTGTTGAGCAACCTTTAGCNdeI/O, B, P

PvRGL173GGATCATTGCCTGTATTCGAGGTGGCACTGTCCCTGATAAACTGEcoRI/G, B, A

PvRGL246CAGCCACCTTGGGTTGGTAATCGACGCAGTTGCTAAATGGACACCHindIII/S, O, P

PvRGL264GTAACTCGTGTCCTCCTCATCTGATACTTGAGAAGGTAAAGGCTGSpeI/B

PvRGL297TTGGAGCAATGAGAAAATAGGGGTCCAGCAGAAGCCCTGTGATGSpeI/G

PvRGL302CTCTTAAAGGACGCACCTACACTATTGGCCTTCAAGACGGTTATSnaBI/G

PvRGL308TAAGATGTGTCAATAAATATGCTGCAGGAAGTTGCTGTAAAGAAGTBspMI/G

*The genotypes shown in this column can be digested by the corresponding restriction enzyme

Primer sequences and sizes of InDels for the RGL-tagged STS markers *The genotypes shown in this column have insertions with the corresponding InDel size Primer sequences and restriction enzymes for the RGL-tagged CAPS markers *The genotypes shown in this column can be digested by the corresponding restriction enzyme

Discussion

As a component of the gene-for-gene resistance mechanism in plants, resistance genes play an important role in recognizing products encoded by specific avirulence genes of a pathogen [49]. In this study, 365 tentative RGLs from common bean were successfully identified by data-mining based on the availability of 454-derived sequences in our lab and common bean ESTs in GenBank. About 60% (218) of identified PvRGLs were from 454-derived sequences; moreover, 166 (76.15%) of the 218 PvRGLs were new transcripts. ESTs are highly valuable for genome annotation and gene structure prediction [50]. The 454 sequencing is a faster and more cost-effective method of producing sequence data than the Sanger method and is capable of producing a 400 to 600 million base pairs per run with 400 to 500 base pair read length [51]. It has been successfully used to maximize gene discovery, improve gene predictions, and detect SNPs and mutations [52,53]. In the past few years, data-mining approaches have been successfully used to isolate RGLs or RGAs from sugarcane [36], wheat [37] and maize [25]. As reported previously, Dilbirligi and Gill [37] adopted four different data-mining methods including domain search, individual and multiple motif searches, consensus sequence search, and individual full-length search to mine R-gene-like wheat sequences, and showed that the individual full-length search was the most successful method. There were 243 NBS-LRRs in addition to 101 other types of expressed R-gene candidates which were then isolated via an individual full-length search using a low E value of e-1 [37]. Xiao et al. [25] used three methods including modified AFLP, RACE and data-mining to isolate RGAs and R-gene-like ESTs from maize and found that the data-mining method is the most efficient way. A total of 186 expressed RGAs were recovered from 550,000 maize ESTs using a moderate E value of e-10 or better [25]. Rossi et al. revealed 88 RGLs from sugarcane ESTs by using a very stringent E value of e-50 or better and represented three major classes of R genes, namely NBS-LRR, LRR-TM and PK [36]. The above three research reports showed that different E values have a great effect on the number of resulting RGA or RGLs. In the present study, the moderate E value of e-10, similar to that in maize, was used to mine common bean RGLs and a total of 365 tentative PvRGLs were identified. Of the 365 tentative PvRGLs, 29 belonged to NBS-LRR type, 96 belonged to LRR, LRR-TM, and LRR-PK type, 229 belonged to PK type, six and five contained sequences with similar to putative TM domains and Toxin reductase domains, respectively. The number of RGLs identified in the present study was about two times more than those in maize due to three reasons. Firstly, 1.77 million 454-derived sequences and common bean ESTs were screened to identify RGLs in common bean, about three times more EST sequences than those in maize (550,000 ESTs). Secondly, 454 sequencing can generate more sequence data than the Sanger sequencing. Therefore, transcripts at extremely low levels can be detected [51]. Finally, some identified PvRGLs match the same R genes or RGLs. For example, PvRGL083 and PvRGL236 match different regions of the same BAC-end sequence. RT-PCR was used to examine the expression of the PvRGLs in this study. Results indicated that all of the selected PvRGLs were actually expressed in the leaves of genotype Sierra (Figure 1). In contrast, many RGLs or RGAs amplified from genomic DNA using degenerate primers or mined from whole genome are not expressed [33]. Previously, eight classes of disease-resistance related sequences were amplified from common bean DNA using degenerate primers based on the conserved NBS domain [33]. Expression analysis indicated that three RGAs (SB1, SB3 and SB8) were not expressed [33]. In Lotus, 62 NBS-encoding sequences were considered as pseudogenes due to encoding of incomplete protein sequences [41]. In Arabidopsis, at least 12 NBS-LRR-encoding genes were predicted to be pseudogenes due to frame shift and nonsense mutations [10]. The PvRGLs discovered in this study correspond to most of the 25 previous common bean R genes or RGAs in the PRGdb database [2]. PvRGL266 and PvRGL275 have strong hits to the P. vulgaris TL5601 disease resistance protein gene with amino acid identity of 90% and 85%, respectively. TL5601, located in the I locus of common bean, controls resistance to Bean Common Mosaic Virus [54]. PvRGL262 matched to coiled-coil NBS-LRR (CNL)-B11 with amino acid identity of 94%. CNL-B11 was mapped in the B4 R gene cluster which contained at least three R genes (Co-9, Co-y, and Co-z) and QTL effective against anthracnose, and Bean golden yellow mosaic virus [55,56]. PvRGL309 was a part of polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) gene. PGIP can inhibit fungal endopolygalacturonases and is considered to be an important factor for plant resistance to phytopathogenic fungi [57]. PvRGL294 was the same as, but much longer in the 5' end than the previous RGL SB3 and OB9 [33]. So far, most of the known R genes have been cloned by map-based cloning and transposon tagging approaches [58]. Therefore, mapping RGLs and RGAs to genomes and/or genetic maps is very important and will facilitate R gene cloning. In this study, 105 PvRGLs could be integrated into the common bean FPC physical map by comparison of PvRGLs to P. vulgaris BAC-end sequences. Additionally, we were able to anchor 237 PvRGLs to the common bean genetic map by using conserved syntenic blocks between common bean and soybean. The PvRGLs are broadly, but unevenly distributed among the 11 linkage groups of common bean with a strong tendency of clustering. For example, 41 PvRGLs, the largest number, were mapped to Pv8, while 17 of them clustered at the bottom of Pv8. David et al. (2008) also found that many specific R genes against various pathogens cluster together: for example, in the B4 resistance gene cluster, 73 BAC clones (FI159954 - FI160067) were identified by using a NBS probe PRLJ1 to screen a common bean BAC library [56]. In the present study, PvRGL173 was anchored at the top of Pv4 by in silico mapping. Meanwhile, PvRGL173 shows high similarity (92.56% and 96.79%) with BAC-end sequence FI160023 (5e-153) and FI159996 (1e-101), respectively. PvRGL173 should be located in the B4 resistance gene cluster. The B4 resistance gene cluster contains various R genes resistant to different pathogens, such as Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (anthracnose), Uromyces appendiculatus (rust), and Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola (halo blight), in addition to QTLs for resistance to BGYMV and anthracnose; therefore further work will be needed to determine the role of PvRGL173. In Medicago, two superclusters of disease resistance genes were identified. One is located at the top of Mt3 containing 73 CNL and 9 TNL encoding sequences. The other is located at the bottom of Mt6 containing 57 TNL encoding sequences [38]. Clustering of R genes facilitates the genetic variation of R genes and benefits in the evolution of new R genes. Bertioli et al. found that retrotransposons were associated with the evolution of some resistance gene clusters via analysis of the synteny among Arachis, Lotus, and Medicago [59]. Several other hypotheses such as duplication, gene conversion, and unequal crossing-over have been proposed to elucidate R gene cluster and evolution [1,38]. Therefore, further studies will be needed to better understand common bean R gene evolution.

Conclusions

In this study, 365 PvRGLs were identified from 454-derived sequences and common bean ESTs in GenBank using data-mining. As a result, 105 and 237 PvRGLs were mapped to the P. vulgaris FPC physical map and genetic map, respectively. RGL-tagged markers were developed for 25 unique PvRGLs, including 11 STS and 19 CAPS markers. These methods and results will help develop more RGL-tagged molecular markers that can be used further for genetic mapping and the isolation of resistance genes from common bean in the future.

Methods

Plant material

Plant genotypes used in this study included P. vulgaris cv. Sierra (S), Olathe (O), G19833 (G), Bat93 (B), Pinto114 (P), and Aurora (A). All of the genotypes were planted in a greenhouse. Leaves of each genotype were harvested from two-week old seedlings for DNA extraction. Additionally, two-week old leaves from Sierra were collected for RNA extraction.

Data mining of common bean RGLs

The amino-acid sequences of 50 known R genes (Table 1), covering the five major R gene classes, were used to search for (tBLASTn) homologues in 454-derived sequences and common bean ESTs in GenBank http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Those sequences with scores more than or equal to 100 and E values less than or equal to 1e-10 were clustered to develop unigenes, and all of the unigenes were considered as putative PvRGLs [25]. The resulting unigenes were in turn used to search the GenBank databases by BLASTX to confirm their putative R gene-like functions. In addition, all tentative PvRGLs were used to identify possible genomic sequences in the Phaseolus genome database http://phaseolus.genomics.purdue.edu/.

Mapping of PvRGLs to G. max pseudomolecules and P. vulgaris linkage groups

The 20 pseudomolecules of the soybean genome were downloaded from ftp://ftp.jgi-psf.org/pub/JGI_data/phytozome/v7.0/Gmax/[60]. BLASTn algorithm was used to search soybean genome as per McClean et al. [48]. Firstly, we selected the hits with a cutoff E value less than 1e-10 and overlaps of at least 150 bp. Secondly, the best two soybean hits for PvRGLs were retrieved for further analysis (See Additional file 4 for all of PvRGLs that matched to soybean with these criteria). The PvRGLs were mapped to common bean linkage groups based on the syntenic blocks between common bean and soybean according to McClean et al. [48].

RNA extraction and expression analysis

Total RNA was isolated from two-week old leaves with Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was treated with DNaseΙ two times to remove all DNA contamination. cDNA synthesis was carried out from 1 μg of RNA using the MMLV reverse transcriptase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). The RT-PCR primers were designed and synthesized at Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Coralville, IA). The RT-PCR was performed with the BIO-RAD PCR system (Hercules, CA) with the following cycling parameters: 94°C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, 72°C for 60 s, and a final elongation at 72°C for 5 min.

PCR amplification and sequence analysis

DNA was isolated from the above six genotypes according to the methods described in Doyle and Doyle [61]. PCR amplification was carried out by designing forward and reverse primers from PvRGLs having a hit to BAC-end sequences. The PCR products were purified using QIAquick® Gel Extraction kit (Germantown, MD) and sequenced at the Macrogen USA Corp (Rockville, MD). The software DNAMAN version 4.0 was used for sequence assembly and multiple sequence alignment to confirm either identities or similarities.

Development of RGL-tagged molecular markers

PvRGL sequences amplified from the above six genotypes were carefully analyzed by the DNAMAN program to identify InDels and SNPs, and those with InDels and SNPs were taken as candidate RGL markers. For STS markers, two 200-bp sequences flanking the InDel site were extracted and used to design PCR primers. Polymorphic PCR bands from the six genotypes were observed on 6% polyacrylamide gels. For CAPS markers, polymorphic PCR bands were observed among the six genotypes following digestion with a particular restriction endonuclease.

Authors' contributions

ZL participated in conceiving the research, sequence analysis, developing molecular markers, PvRGL mapping, and writing the manuscript. MC participated in material preparation, developing molecular markers, and contributed to writing of the manuscript. AT participated in PvRGL sequencing and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. VK participated in conceiving the research, providing the 454 sequences, and contributed to writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional file 1

Sequences of 365 tentative PvRGLs. Click here for file

Additional file 2

Characterization of 365 tentative PvRGLs. Click here for file

Additional file 3

105 PvRGLs having a hit with a BAC-end sequence. Click here for file

Additional file 4

Mapping PvRGLs to . Click here for file
  54 in total

1.  Plant disease resistance genes encode members of an ancient and diverse protein family within the nucleotide-binding superfamily.

Authors:  B C Meyers; A W Dickerman; R W Michelmore; S Sivaramakrishnan; B W Sobral; N D Young
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  Crg, a gene required for Ur-3-mediated rust resistance in common bean, maps to a resistance gene analog cluster.

Authors:  V Kalavacharia; J R Stavely; J R Myers; P E McClean
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 3.  The generation of plant disease resistance gene specificities.

Authors:  J Ellis; P Dodds; T Pryor
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  Genomic distribution and characterization of EST-derived resistance gene analogs (RGAs) in sugarcane.

Authors:  M Rossi; P G Araujo; F Paulet; O Garsmeur; V M Dias; H Chen; M-A Van Sluys; A D'Hont
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Molecular analysis of a large subtelomeric nucleotide-binding-site-leucine-rich-repeat family in two representative genotypes of the major gene pools of Phaseolus vulgaris.

Authors:  Valérie Geffroy; Catherine Macadré; Perrine David; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand; Mireille Sévignac; Catherine Dauga; Thierry Langin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Cleavage of Arabidopsis PBS1 by a bacterial type III effector.

Authors:  Feng Shao; Catherine Golstein; Jules Ade; Mark Stoutemyer; Jack E Dixon; Roger W Innes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Isolation of a superfamily of candidate disease-resistance genes in soybean based on a conserved nucleotide-binding site.

Authors:  Y G Yu; G R Buss; M A Maroof
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reductase activity encoded by the HM1 disease resistance gene in maize.

Authors:  G S Johal; S P Briggs
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Phylogeny and genomic organization of the TIR and non-tIR NBS-LRR resistance gene family in Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Hongyan Zhu; Steven B Cannon; Nevin D Young; Douglas R Cook
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Identification of candidate genome regions controlling disease resistance in Arachis.

Authors:  Soraya C M Leal-Bertioli; Ana Carolina V F José; Dione M T Alves-Freitas; Márcio C Moretzsohn; Patrícia M Guimarães; Stephan Nielen; Bruna S Vidigal; Rinaldo W Pereira; Jodie Pike; Alessandra P Fávero; Martin Parniske; Rajeev K Varshney; David J Bertioli
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  11 in total

1.  Genome-wide identification and characterization of NB-ARC resistant genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and their expression during leaf rust infection.

Authors:  Saket Chandra; Andaleeb Z Kazmi; Zainab Ahmed; Gargi Roychowdhury; Veena Kumari; Manish Kumar; Kunal Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  Genome-wide identification of the Phaseolus vulgaris sRNAome using small RNA and degradome sequencing.

Authors:  Damien Formey; Luis Pedro Iñiguez; Pablo Peláez; Yong-Fang Li; Ramanjulu Sunkar; Federico Sánchez; José Luis Reyes; Georgina Hernández
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  De novo transcriptome assembly of the wild relative of tea tree (Camellia taliensis) and comparative analysis with tea transcriptome identified putative genes associated with tea quality and stress response.

Authors:  Hai-Bin Zhang; En-Hua Xia; Hui Huang; Jian-Jun Jiang; Ben-Ying Liu; Li-Zhi Gao
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Transcriptome analysis of salt tolerant common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under saline conditions.

Authors:  Mahmut Can Hiz; Balkan Canher; Harun Niron; Muge Turet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Common bean reaction to angular leaf spot comprises transcriptional modulation of genes in the ALS10.1 QTL.

Authors:  Paula R Oblessuc; Cleverson C Matiolli; Alisson F Chiorato; Luis E A Camargo; Luciana L Benchimol-Reis; Maeli Melotto
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Genome-wide investigation and expression analysis of AP2-ERF gene family in salt tolerant common bean.

Authors:  Musa Kavas; Aslihan Kizildogan; Gökhan Gökdemir; Mehmet Cengiz Baloglu
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.068

7.  Transcriptome Profiling Identifies Candidate Genes Associated with the Accumulation of Distinct Sulfur γ-Glutamyl Dipeptides in Phaseolus vulgaris and Vigna mungo Seeds.

Authors:  Dengqun Liao; Dustin Cram; Andrew G Sharpe; Frédéric Marsolais
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Analysis of the leaf transcriptome of Musa acuminata during interaction with Mycosphaerella musicola: gene assembly, annotation and marker development.

Authors:  Marco A N Passos; Viviane Oliveira de Cruz; Flavia L Emediato; Cristiane Camargo de Teixeira; Vânia C Rennó Azevedo; Ana C M Brasileiro; Edson P Amorim; Claudia F Ferreira; Natalia F Martins; Roberto C Togawa; Georgios J Pappas Júnior; Orzenil Bonfim da Silva; Robert N G Miller
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  The effect on the transcriptome of Anemone coronaria following infection with rust (Tranzschelia discolor).

Authors:  Marina Laura; Cristina Borghi; Valentina Bobbio; Andrea Allavena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sequencing and characterization of leaf transcriptomes of six diploid Nicotiana species.

Authors:  Ni Long; Xueliang Ren; Zhidan Xiang; Wenting Wan; Yang Dong
Journal:  J Biol Res (Thessalon)       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.