Literature DB >> 22443176

Hamman-Rich syndrome revisited: how to avoid misdiagnosis.

Jiro Fujita, Masato Tohyama, Shusaku Haranaga, Haley L Cash, Futoshi Higa, Masao Tateyama.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22443176      PMCID: PMC5780725          DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2012.00353.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses        ISSN: 1750-2640            Impact factor:   4.380


× No keyword cloud information.
A 59‐year‐old man who had no underlying diseases except for obesity was referred to a private clinic with fever and sore throat. A rapid diagnostic test for influenza using the throat swab was performed and the result was negative. His symptoms did not improve, and he developed shortness of breath and inspiratory crackles in both lung fields, resulting in his transfer to a medium‐sized hospital. A rapid antigen test for influenza using the throat swab was negative again, and thus, the patient was considered to have acute interstitial pneumonia based on chest radiological findings (Figure 1), and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) as well as transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) was performed (Figure 2A, demonstrating a diffuse alveolar damage compatible with acute interstitial pneumonia). Using BAL fluid, PCR for pandemic H1N1 2009 was positive. In addition, a rapid diagnostic test for influenza A was also positive using BAL fluid (Figure 2B).
Figure 1

 Chest X‐ray and chest CT findings of patient Both chest X‐ray and chest CT demonstrate ground‐glass and infiltrative shadow in both lung fields.

Figure 2

 Transbronchial lung biopsy (A) and rapid diagnostic test for influenza A Transbronchial biopsy specimen demonstrates the formation of a hyaline membrane which is compatible with acute interstitial pneumonia. Rapid diagnostic test for influenza A was positive using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.

Chest X‐ray and chest CT findings of patient Both chest X‐ray and chest CT demonstrate ground‐glass and infiltrative shadow in both lung fields. Transbronchial lung biopsy (A) and rapid diagnostic test for influenza A Transbronchial biopsy specimen demonstrates the formation of a hyaline membrane which is compatible with acute interstitial pneumonia. Rapid diagnostic test for influenza A was positive using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Two types of commercially available kits [QuickNavi™‐Flu (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and RapidTesta®‐Flu Stick (Sekisui Medical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan)] were used for the detection of influenza with this patient. It has been reported that the sensitivity of several rapid antigen test is not high enough for swine influenza virus detection. , , , , Several reports have demonstrated 40–69%, 51%, 38·3–53·3% and 44·2% sensitivities. In addition, it has also been suggested that by age group, clinical sensitivity was 85·7% in patients <2 years old, 60·3% in patients between 2 and 39 years old, and 33·3% in patients aged 40 and older. Therefore, clinicians should understand the obvious limitations (inadequate sensitivity) of many currently available rapid diagnostic tests for influenza viral infection. If PCR for pandemic H1N1 2009 had not been performed, the patient would have been diagnosed with acute interstitial pneumonia: Hamman‐Rich syndrome.

Author contribution

JF, MT, SH, FH and MT took care of this patient. HLC significantly helped to revise this letter.

Disclosure

None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this study.
  5 in total

1.  Rapid-test sensitivity for novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans.

Authors:  Dennis J Faix; Sterling S Sherman; Steven H Waterman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Evaluation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) Virus - United States, 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Diagnostic capacity of rapid influenza antigen test: reappraisal with experience from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

Authors:  Jeng-How Yang; Po-Yen Huang; Shian-Shen Shie; Chung-Guei Huang; Kuo-Chien Tsao; Ching-Tai Huang
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.399

4.  Detection of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus Infection in different age groups by using rapid influenza diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Fengxiang Gao; Carol Loring; Michael Laviolette; Denise Bolton; Elizabeth R Daly; Christine Bean
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Rapid antigen tests for diagnosis of pandemic (Swine) influenza A/H1N1.

Authors:  Shawn Vasoo; Jane Stevens; Kamaljit Singh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 9.079

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.