Literature DB >> 22443103

Spatial cluster detection using dynamic programming.

Yuriy Sverchkov1, Xia Jiang, Gregory F Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The task of spatial cluster detection involves finding spatial regions where some property deviates from the norm or the expected value. In a probabilistic setting this task can be expressed as finding a region where some event is significantly more likely than usual. Spatial cluster detection is of interest in fields such as biosurveillance, mining of astronomical data, military surveillance, and analysis of fMRI images. In almost all such applications we are interested both in the question of whether a cluster exists in the data, and if it exists, we are interested in finding the most accurate characterization of the cluster.
METHODS: We present a general dynamic programming algorithm for grid-based spatial cluster detection. The algorithm can be used for both Bayesian maximum a-posteriori (MAP) estimation of the most likely spatial distribution of clusters and Bayesian model averaging over a large space of spatial cluster distributions to compute the posterior probability of an unusual spatial clustering. The algorithm is explained and evaluated in the context of a biosurveillance application, specifically the detection and identification of Influenza outbreaks based on emergency department visits. A relatively simple underlying model is constructed for the purpose of evaluating the algorithm, and the algorithm is evaluated using the model and semi-synthetic test data.
RESULTS: When compared to baseline methods, tests indicate that the new algorithm can improve MAP estimates under certain conditions: the greedy algorithm we compared our method to was found to be more sensitive to smaller outbreaks, while as the size of the outbreaks increases, in terms of area affected and proportion of individuals affected, our method overtakes the greedy algorithm in spatial precision and recall. The new algorithm performs on-par with baseline methods in the task of Bayesian model averaging.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the dynamic programming algorithm performs on-par with other available methods for spatial cluster detection and point to its low computational cost and extendability as advantages in favor of further research and use of the algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22443103      PMCID: PMC3403878          DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak        ISSN: 1472-6947            Impact factor:   2.796


  5 in total

1.  An elliptic spatial scan statistic.

Authors:  Martin Kulldorff; Lan Huang; Linda Pickle; Luiz Duczmal
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A recursive algorithm for spatial cluster detection.

Authors:  Xia Jiang; Gregory F Cooper
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

3.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Evaluating cluster alarms: a space-time scan statistic and brain cancer in Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Authors:  M Kulldorff; W F Athas; E J Feurer; B A Miller; C R Key
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  A flexibly shaped spatial scan statistic for detecting clusters.

Authors:  Toshiro Tango; Kunihiko Takahashi
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 3.918

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.