Literature DB >> 22442366

Do ants need to be old and experienced to teach?

Elizabeth L Franklin1, Elva J H Robinson, James A R Marshall, Ana B Sendova-Franks, Nigel R Franks.   

Abstract

Learning is widespread in invertebrates. However, whether social insects improve their recruitment skills with experience is only beginning to be investigated. Tandem running is a one-to-one form of recruitment used by certain species of ant. It is a remarkable communication system that meets widely accepted criteria for teaching in non-human animals. Here, we determined experimentally to what extent participation in, and efficient execution of, tandem running depends on either the age or the experience of worker ants. To investigate these issues, we constructed colonies of the ant Temnothorax albipennis with different compositions of inexperienced and experienced workers from different age cohorts and then examined which ants participated in tandem runs when they emigrated. Our results show that the ability to participate actively in recruitment by tandem running is present in all worker age groups but the propensity to participate varies with experience rather than age per se. Experienced individuals were more likely to engage in tandem runs, either as leaders or as followers, than young inexperienced individuals, and older experienced ants were more likely to lead tandems than older inexperienced ants. Young inexperienced ants led faster, more rapidly dispersing and less accurately orientated tandem runs than the older experienced ants. Our study suggests that experience (rather than age per se) coupled to stimulus threshold responses might interact to promote a division of labour so that a suitable number of workers actively participate in tandem runs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22442366     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.064618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

Review 1.  Spatial cognition in the context of foraging styles and information transfer in ants.

Authors:  Zhanna Reznikova
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Follower ants in a tandem pair are not always naïve.

Authors:  Patrick Schultheiss; Chloé A Raderschall; Ajay Narendra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The influence of the few: a stable 'oligarchy' controls information flow in house-hunting ants.

Authors:  Thomas O Richardson; Charles Mullon; James A R Marshall; Nigel R Franks; Thomas Schlegel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Regulation of Ant Foraging: A Review of the Role of Information Use and Personality.

Authors:  Swetashree Kolay; Raphaël Boulay; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-28

5.  Leadership - not followership - determines performance in ant teams.

Authors:  Nathalie Stroeymeyt; Laurent Keller; Thomas O Richardson; Andrea Coti
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-06

6.  Behavioural variation among workers promotes feed-forward loops in a simulated insect colony.

Authors:  Carrie Easter; Ellouise Leadbeater; Matthew J Hasenjager
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  A Design Pattern for Decentralised Decision Making.

Authors:  Andreagiovanni Reina; Gabriele Valentini; Cristian Fernández-Oto; Marco Dorigo; Vito Trianni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.