Literature DB >> 22442350

Donor versus no-donor comparison of newly diagnosed myeloma patients included in the HOVON-50 multiple myeloma study.

Henk M Lokhorst1, Bronno van der Holt, Jan J Cornelissen, Marie-José Kersten, Marinus van Oers, Reinier Raymakers, Monique C Minnema, Sonja Zweegman, Jeroen J Janssen, Mark Zijlmans, Gerard Bos, Nicolaas Schaap, Shulamiet Wittebol, Okke de Weerdt, Rianne Ammerlaan, Pieter Sonneveld.   

Abstract

To prospectively evaluate allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for myeloma as part of first-line therapy, a donor versus no-donor analysis was performed of patients treated in the HOVON-50 study, a study that was originally designed to examine thalidomide combined with intensive therapy. Two hundred sixty patients having received an autologous-SCT fulfilled the criteria to be included, 138 patients without an HLA-identical sibling donor and 122 patients with a donor. After a median follow-up of 77 months, complete remission, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were not significantly different between the 2 groups. PFS at 6 years was 28% for patients with a donor versus 22% for patients without a donor (P = .19) and overall survival at 6 years from high-dose melphalan was 55%, irrespective of having a donor (P = .68). Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality at 6 years after autologous-SCT was 16% in the donor group versus 3% in the no-donor group (P < .001). However, PFS was significantly prolonged in the 99 patients who actually proceeded to allo-SCT compared with the 115 patients who continued maintenance or received a second high-dose melphalan, but the difference did not translate into a prolonged survival benefit. These results do not support a general application of allo-SCT in all myeloma patients as part of first-line therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22442350     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-393801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  44 in total

1.  Reduced relapse rate in upfront tandem autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation in multiple myeloma only results in borderline non-significant prolongation of progression-free but not overall survival.

Authors:  Henk M Lokhorst; Bronno van der Holt; Jan J Cornelissen; Marie José Kersten; Marinus van Oers; Reinier Raymakers; Monique C Minnema; Sonja Zweegman; Gerard Bos; Nicolaas Schaap; Shulamiet Wittebol; Okke de Weerdt; Rianne Ammerlaan; Pieter Sonneveld
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Long-Term Follow-up of CALGB (Alliance) 100001: Autologous Followed by Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Transplant for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Sarah A Holstein; Vera J Suman; Kouros Owzar; Katelyn Santo; Don M Benson; Thomas C Shea; Thomas Martin; Margarida Silverman; Luis Isola; Ravi Vij; Bruce D Cheson; Charles Linker; Kenneth C Anderson; Paul G Richardson; Philip L McCarthy
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  A View from the Plateau: Is There a Role for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of Highly Effective Therapies for Multiple Myeloma?

Authors:  Damian J Green; William I Bensinger
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 4.  European perspective on multiple myeloma treatment strategies in 2014.

Authors:  Heinz Ludwig; Pieter Sonneveld; Faith Davies; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; Michele Cavo; Gareth Morgan; Javier de la Rubia; Michel Delforge; Meletios Dimopoulos; Hermann Einsele; Thierry Facon; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Philippe Moreau; Hareth Nahi; Torben Plesner; Jesús San-Miguel; Roman Hajek; Pia Sondergeld; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-07-25

5.  Comparison of upfront tandem autologous-allogeneic transplantation versus reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  F Sahebi; S Iacobelli; A V Biezen; L Volin; P Dreger; M Michallet; P T Ljungman; T de Witte; A Henseler; N P M Schaap; L López-Corral; X Poire; J Passweg; R-M Hamljadi; S H Thomas; S Schonland; G Gahrton; C Morris; N KrÖger; L Garderet
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Adverse impact of high donor CD3+ cell dose on outcome following tandem auto-NMA allogeneic transplantation for high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  A P Nair; P Walker; A Kalff; K Bergin; J Hocking; S Avery; D J Curtis; S Patil; T Das; D Klarica; S Morgan; J Muirhead; M Gorniak; J Reynolds; A Spencer
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Current approaches to the initial treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jagoda K Jasielec; Andrzej J Jakubowiak
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-02

8.  LDH and renal function are prognostic factors for long-term outcomes of multiple myeloma patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Roni Shouval; Omer Teper; Joshua A Fein; Ivetta Danylesko; Noga Shem Tov; Ronit Yerushalmi; Abraham Avigdor; Elena Vasilev; Hila Magen; Arnon Nagler; Avichai Shimoni
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 9.  Immunologic approaches for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Leo Rasche; Niels Weinhold; Gareth J Morgan; Frits van Rhee; Faith E Davies
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 12.111

10.  Late relapses following reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Firoozeh Sahebi; Yan Shen; Sandra H Thomas; Amalia Rincon; Joyce Murata-Collins; Joycelynne Palmer; Amrita Y Krishnan; Chatchada Karanes; Myo Htut; George Somlo; Stephen J Forman
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 6.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.