Literature DB >> 22441560

[Multiple myeloma: current recommendations for imaging].

J Hillengass1, S Delorme.   

Abstract

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Imaging in monoclonal plasma cell disease serves to detect end organ damage, i.e., osteoporosis or bone destruction. Diffuse or circumscribed bone marrow infiltration without damage to mineralized bone is so far not regarded as end organ damage. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
METHODS: Skeletal plain x-ray film survey to detect bone destruction, osteoporosis or fractures. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Whole body low-dose computed tomography (CT) and whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow a more sensitive assessment of both mineralized bone and bone marrow, with greater patient comfort and in the case of MRI without ionizing radiation. PERFORMANCE: According to the literature, cross-sectional imaging is clearly superior to skeletal surveys and MRI is more sensitive than CT. Every locally destructive lesion will be detectable with MRI but for assessing the damage to mineralized bone CT is indispensible. The sensitivities of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and MRI are comparable. ACHIEVEMENTS: If available whole body MRI and whole body low dose CT should replace conventional skeletal surveys. This has already been implemented in several centers in Germany. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: For the initial diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma or symptomatic multiple myeloma, a whole-body MRI and a whole body low-dose CT should be performed. For MGUS and asymptomatic myeloma, whole body MRI only should be performed for follow-up until detection of first bone destruction. Patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma and known bone destruction will usually have whole body low-dose CT, supplemented by MRI studies where clinically required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22441560     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-011-2257-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  28 in total

1.  Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography.

Authors:  Marius Horger; Claus D Claussen; Ulrike Bross-Bach; Reinhard Vonthein; Tobias Trabold; Martin Heuschmid; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Consensus recommendations for standard investigative workup: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 3.

Authors:  Meletios Dimopoulos; Robert Kyle; Jean-Paul Fermand; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesus San Miguel; Asher Chanan-Khan; Heinz Ludwig; Douglas Joshua; Jayesh Mehta; Morie Gertz; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Meral Beksaç; Kenneth C Anderson; Philippe Moreau; Seema Singhal; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Mario Boccadoro; Shaji Kumar; Sergio Giralt; Nikhil C Munshi; Sundar Jagannath
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma based on Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-adapted Therapy (mSMART): consensus statement.

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri; S Vincent Rajkumar; Morie A Gertz; Rafael Fonseca; Martha Q Lacy; P Leif Bergsagel; Robert A Kyle; Philip R Greipp; Thomas E Witzig; Craig B Reeder; John A Lust; Stephen J Russell; Suzanne R Hayman; Vivek Roy; Shaji Kumar; Steven R Zeldenrust; Robert J Dalton; A Keith Stewart
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  The benefit of using whole-body, low-dose, nonenhanced, multidetector computed tomography for follow-up and therapy response monitoring in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Marius Horger; Lothar Kanz; Barbara Denecke; Reinhard Vonthein; Philippe Pereira; Claus D Claussen; Christoph Driessen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; Robert A Kyle; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Jerry A Katzmann; Neil E Caporaso; Richard B Hayes; Angela Dispenzieri; Shaji Kumar; Raynell J Clark; Dalsu Baris; Robert Hoover; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Sonja Buhmann; Christoph Becker; Stefan Oswald Schoenberg; Nicola Lang; Reiner Bartl; Maximilian Ferdinand Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: importance of whole-body versus spinal MR imaging.

Authors:  Tobias Bäuerle; Jens Hillengass; Kerstin Fechtner; Christian M Zechmann; Lars Grenacher; Thomas M Moehler; Heiss Christiane; Barbara Wagner-Gund; Kai Neben; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Accuracy of whole-body low-dose multidetector CT (WBLDCT) versus skeletal survey in the detection of myelomatous lesions, and correlation of disease distribution with whole-body MRI (WBMRI).

Authors:  T G Gleeson; J Moriarty; C P Shortt; J P Gleeson; P Fitzpatrick; B Byrne; J McHugh; M O'Connell; P O'Gorman; S J Eustace
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Clincal features and treatment of multiple myeloma].

Authors:  E K Mai; H Goldschmidt
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Body fat composition as predictive factor for treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma - subgroup analysis of the prospective GMMG MM5 trial.

Authors:  Jonathan P GroΔ; Johanna Nattenmüller; Stefan Hemmer; Diana Tichy; Julia Krzykalla; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Uta Bertsch; Stefan Delorme; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Jens Hillengass; Maximilian Merz
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.