Literature DB >> 22441462

Testing of Lagrange multiplier damped least-squares control algorithm for woofer-tweeter adaptive optics.

Weiyao Zou1, Stephen A Burns.   

Abstract

A Lagrange multiplier-based damped least-squares control algorithm for woofer-tweeter (W-T) dual deformable-mirror (DM) adaptive optics (AO) is tested with a breadboard system. We show that the algorithm can complementarily command the two DMs to correct wavefront aberrations within a single optimization process: the woofer DM correcting the high-stroke, low-order aberrations, and the tweeter DM correcting the low-stroke, high-order aberrations. The optimal damping factor for a DM is found to be the median of the eigenvalue spectrum of the influence matrix of that DM. Wavefront control accuracy is maximized with the optimized control parameters. For the breadboard system, the residual wavefront error can be controlled to the precision of 0.03 μm in root mean square. The W-T dual-DM AO has applications in both ophthalmology and astronomy.
© 2012 Optical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22441462      PMCID: PMC3407539          DOI: 10.1364/AO.51.001198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  29 in total

1.  Application of the parallel generalized projection algorithm to the control of two finite-resolution deformable mirrors for scintillation compensation.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Barchers
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Determination method of an initial damping factor in the damped-least-squares problem.

Authors:  H Matsui; K Tanaka
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Higher order aberrations across the horizontal visual field.

Authors:  David A Atchison
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Adaptive optics-optical coherence tomography: optimizing visualization of microscopic retinal structures in three dimensions.

Authors:  Robert J Zawadzki; Stacey S Choi; Steven M Jones; Scot S Oliver; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Correction of ocular and atmospheric wavefronts: a comparison of the performance of various deformable mirrors.

Authors:  Nicholas Devaney; Eugenie Dalimier; Thomas Farrell; Derek Coburn; Ruth Mackey; David Mackey; Francois Laurent; Elizabeth Daly; Chris Dainty
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Peripheral optical errors and their change with accommodation differ between emmetropic and myopic eyes.

Authors:  Linda Lundström; Alejandro Mira-Agudelo; Pablo Artal
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  High-accuracy wavefront control for retinal imaging with Adaptive-Influence-Matrix Adaptive Optics.

Authors:  Weiyao Zou; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  A correction algorithm to simultaneously control dual deformable mirrors in a woofer-tweeter adaptive optics system.

Authors:  Chaohong Li; Nripun Sredar; Kevin M Ivers; Hope Queener; Jason Porter
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Ocular aberrations in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Ankit Mathur; David A Atchison; Dion H Scott
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.776

10.  Improving wavefront boundary condition for in vivo high resolution adaptive optics ophthalmic imaging.

Authors:  Weiyao Zou; Xiaofeng Qi; Gang Huang; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging: technology update.

Authors:  David Merino; Pablo Loza-Alvarez
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.