Literature DB >> 22441357

Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to 500 Hz fz bone-conducted vibration in superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Leonardo Manzari1, Ann M Burgess, Leigh A McGarvie, Ian S Curthoys.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) on the n10 component of the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP n10) and the p13-n23 component of the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP p13-n23) evoked by 500 Hz bone-conducted vibration (BCV) at the midline forehead at the hairline (Fz) in 26 patients with computed tomography-verified SSCD. Previous evidence has led to the proposal that the oVEMP n10 is of utricular origin whereas the cVEMP p13-n23 is of saccular origin. The question is can the oVEMP n10 to 500 Hz BCV indicate SSCD?
DESIGN: A hand-held Bruel & Kjaer 4810 Minishaker was used to provide BCV stimulation using surface electromyography electrodes to record oVEMP n10 and cVEMP p13-n23. The stimulus was 7 msec bursts of 500 Hz BCV at either Fz or at the vertex of the skull (Cz). Twenty-seven healthy subjects were tested in the same paradigm.
RESULTS: In response to 500 Hz Fz BCV in SSCD patients the oVEMP n10 amplitude beneath the contraSSCD eye was substantially and significantly larger than the oVEMP n10 beneath the ipsiSSCD eye, whereas in these same patients the cVEMP p13-n23 amplitude over the ipsiSSCD sternocleidomastoid muscle to Fz BCV was slightly but significantly larger than the cVEMP p13-n23 amplitude over the contraSSCD sternocleidomastoid muscle. In SSCD patients there was a significant relationship between the size of the dehiscence and the amplitude of the contralateral oVEMP n10 potential. The oVEMP n10 to Cz stimulation was still present in SSCD patients, but small or absent in healthy subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: In response to 500 Hz Fz BCV an asymmetrical oVEMP n10 with a significantly increased amplitude of contralesional oVEMP n10 (compared with population values of healthy subjects) is a simple useful indicator of SSCD, confirmed by the Cz response. oVEMP testing with 500 Hz Fz BCV allows very simple, very fast identification of a probable unilateral SSCD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22441357     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182498c09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  18 in total

Review 1.  Clinical utility of ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs).

Authors:  Konrad P Weber; Sally M Rosengren
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing.

Authors:  Andrea Castellucci; Gianluca Piras; Valeria Del Vecchio; Francesco Maria Crocetta; Vincenzo Maiolo; Gian Gaetano Ferri; Angelo Ghidini; Cristina Brandolini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Computerized Assessment of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Size using Advanced Morphological Imaging Operators.

Authors:  Joel S Beckett; Carlito Lagman; Lawrance K Chung; Timothy T Bui; Seung J Lee; Brittany L Voth; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-07

4.  Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) to skull taps in normal and dehiscent ears: mechanisms and markers of superior canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Rachael L Taylor; Catherine Blaivie; Andreas P Bom; Berit Holmeslet; Tony Pansell; Krister Brantberg; Miriam S Welgampola
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  [Superior canal dehiscence syndrome : Diagnosis with vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and fremitus nystagmus. German version].

Authors:  R Gürkov; C Jerin; W Flatz; R Maxwell
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  The new vestibular stimuli: sound and vibration-anatomical, physiological and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Optimizing ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing for superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: electrode placement.

Authors:  M Geraldine Zuniga; Marcela Davalos-Bichara; Michael C Schubert; John P Carey; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Air-conducted oVEMPs provide the best separation between intact and superior canal dehiscent labyrinths.

Authors:  Kristen L Janky; Kimanh D Nguyen; Miriam Welgampola; M Geraldine Zuniga; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials n10 response in autism spectrum disorders children with auditory hypersensitivity: an indicator of semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Elsaeid M Thabet
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  The effect of increased intracranial pressure on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  Kristen L Janky; M Geraldine Zuniga; Michael C Schubert; John P Carey
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.