Literature DB >> 22440592

Radiation emission from patients treated with selective hepatic radioembolization using yttrium-90 microspheres: are contact restrictions necessary?

Jeffrey W McCann1, Ann M Larkin, Larry J Martino, David J Eschelman, Carin F Gonsalves, Daniel B Brown.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the possible radiation dose to other individuals from patients treated with yttrium-90 ((90)Y).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dosimetry data were analyzed after 143 consecutive administrations of (90)Y (124 resin, 19 glass) in 86 patients. External radiation exposure levels from patients were measured immediately after infusion. Total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) to maximally exposed individuals was calculated based on total body residence time and measured dose rate. These values were compared to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations (maximum, 1 mSv) and other potential guidelines for caregivers, extensive caregivers, or pregnant contacts.
RESULTS: Mean administered activity for resin microspheres was 0.71 GBq ± 0.35 (range, 0.07-1.6GBq). Mean TEDE dose to the maximally exposed contact was 0.03 mSv (range, 0.0005-0.16 mSv). For glass microspheres, mean administered activity was 2.8 GBq ± 1.5 (range, 0.37-5.14 GBq). Mean TEDE dose to the maximally exposed contact was 0.06 mSv (range, 0.0023-0.23 mSv). All (90)Y treatments were within current NRC regulations for release without instructions. One, three, and one infusion were beyond potential thresholds for caregivers, extensive caregivers, or pregnant contacts, respectively. For any contact scenario, release without instruction was appropriate when administered activity was less than 3 GBq.
CONCLUSIONS: All patients treated with (90)Y hepatic radioembolization to a maximum administered activity of 5.14 GBq and maximum dose rate of 10 uSv/h were releasable without contact restrictions according to the NRC contact scenario. Patients who receive more than 3 GBq during infusion may require dose rate measurement if more restrictive contact scenarios are considered.
Copyright © 2012 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22440592     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.01.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  5 in total

1.  Multimodal treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma to achieve complete response results in improved survival.

Authors:  Pippa H Newell; YingXing Wu; Helena Hoen; Richa Uppal; John Tyler Thiesing; Kevin Sasadeusz; Maria A Cassera; Ronald F Wolf; Paul Hansen; Chet W Hammill
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Personnel dose reduction in 90Y microspheres liver-directed radioembolization: from interventional radiology suite to patient ward.

Authors:  Martin Law; K K Wong; W K Tso; Victor Lee; M Y Luk; C C Tong; Ferdinand Chu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Hepatic radioembolization as a bridge to liver surgery.

Authors:  Arthur J A T Braat; Julia E Huijbregts; I Quintus Molenaar; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Marnix G E H Lam
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Yttrium-90 Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Glass Microspheres for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current and Updated Literature Review.

Authors:  Edward Wolfgang Lee; Lourdes Alanis; Sung-Ki Cho; Sammy Saab
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Built-In Dosimetry: First in vivo Results with Uniformly-Sized, Biodegradable Microspheres Labeled with 188Re.

Authors:  José Carlos De La Vega; Pedro Luis Esquinas; Cristina Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Mehrdad Bokharaei; Igor Moskalev; David Liu; Katayoun Saatchi; Urs O Häfeli
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 11.556

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.